Quote Originally Posted by Upandoher: @fubah2 Out of your 5 plays which has the biggest run advantage? Out of my 5 plays SO FAAR that is...more possible... Baahhstin +1.5 Washing +1.4 Tampa +1.2 Giants +1.0 CWS +1.0 LEANS:NYY +0.8 and Twinkies +1.2 Still 5 more games to cap after I took a long break . . .
Adding:
TWINKIES -141 @pinn *BB ...this bet depends a lot on Bradley not having a BAAD outing and TWINS offense continues per normal avg.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Upandoher: @fubah2 Out of your 5 plays which has the biggest run advantage? Out of my 5 plays SO FAAR that is...more possible... Baahhstin +1.5 Washing +1.4 Tampa +1.2 Giants +1.0 CWS +1.0 LEANS:NYY +0.8 and Twinkies +1.2 Still 5 more games to cap after I took a long break . . .
Adding:
TWINKIES -141 @pinn *BB ...this bet depends a lot on Bradley not having a BAAD outing and TWINS offense continues per normal avg.
Quote Originally Posted by Upandoher: @fubah2 Out of your 5 plays which has the biggest run advantage? Out of my 5 plays SO FAR that is...more possible...
Baahhstin +1.5
Just took a 7 - 3 lead off a slammy top 11th
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Upandoher: @fubah2 Out of your 5 plays which has the biggest run advantage? Out of my 5 plays SO FAR that is...more possible...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Upandoher: @fubah2 Out of your 5 plays which has the biggest run advantage? Out of my 5 plays SO FAR that is...more possible... Baahhstin +1.5 Just took a 7 - 3 lead off a slammy top 11th
My bets are unlikely to win today....looking more like a 3 - 4 LOSING effort.....proving to me that regression on two fronts - as I discussed earlier - is still with me and I can't seem to shake it....
TAILING anyone during his "looming regression" is a BAD IDEA.
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Upandoher: @fubah2 Out of your 5 plays which has the biggest run advantage? Out of my 5 plays SO FAR that is...more possible... Baahhstin +1.5 Just took a 7 - 3 lead off a slammy top 11th
My bets are unlikely to win today....looking more like a 3 - 4 LOSING effort.....proving to me that regression on two fronts - as I discussed earlier - is still with me and I can't seem to shake it....
TAILING anyone during his "looming regression" is a BAD IDEA.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It seems ridiculous to consider an UNDER when it's already a LOW number to begin with but that is what my capping is suggesting for the Cleveland/ANGELS game. Two weak offenses facing two VERY GOOD starters and better than avg pens! My estimate suggests 4.8 to 7.0 total runs is the most likely range and so I am wondering why Vegas doesn't have a line of 6 or 6.5..... If I was an UNDER bettor (NOT! ) I might like that under 7.5 that is widely available for a small bet...but personally I PASS and this a bet on my capping for an under is NOT recommended because I LOSE more than win...
BTW, in this game, while I DO have Cleveland for an edge to win, butit's thin. It's not a coin-flipper per se but fairly close.... maybe +0.3 edge or so....Cleveland should have around a 53% - 55% chance to win, imho. But those who like "value bets" when it's estimated to be close while one team is getting significant PLUS $$$ (Angels!!!) might consider this...
Angels lead 5 - 0 early and threatening more So the PLUS $$$ value bet looks good at the moment for anyone who was so inclined..... Meanwhile the UNDER is in serious danger - which is why I completely avoid UNDERS when my capping suggests it . . .
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It seems ridiculous to consider an UNDER when it's already a LOW number to begin with but that is what my capping is suggesting for the Cleveland/ANGELS game. Two weak offenses facing two VERY GOOD starters and better than avg pens! My estimate suggests 4.8 to 7.0 total runs is the most likely range and so I am wondering why Vegas doesn't have a line of 6 or 6.5..... If I was an UNDER bettor (NOT! ) I might like that under 7.5 that is widely available for a small bet...but personally I PASS and this a bet on my capping for an under is NOT recommended because I LOSE more than win...
BTW, in this game, while I DO have Cleveland for an edge to win, butit's thin. It's not a coin-flipper per se but fairly close.... maybe +0.3 edge or so....Cleveland should have around a 53% - 55% chance to win, imho. But those who like "value bets" when it's estimated to be close while one team is getting significant PLUS $$$ (Angels!!!) might consider this...
Angels lead 5 - 0 early and threatening more So the PLUS $$$ value bet looks good at the moment for anyone who was so inclined..... Meanwhile the UNDER is in serious danger - which is why I completely avoid UNDERS when my capping suggests it . . .
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: My capping shows CUBBIES with about a +0.6 run edge Normally I would bet this but I pass entirely due to being more selective. So this "woulda" that I passed on, is up 3 - 0 after 4 innings.
Now CUBS are up 4 - 0 and bases loaded!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: My capping shows CUBBIES with about a +0.6 run edge Normally I would bet this but I pass entirely due to being more selective. So this "woulda" that I passed on, is up 3 - 0 after 4 innings.