NO WAY HE LOST THAT FIGHT
HE CLEARLY WON ROUNDS 2 AND 3
Give me a break
Thats all Sherk did in round 2, hold him against the cage
for the last minute of that round Dunham was teeing off on him
again, Dunham clearly won the last two rounds
Give me a break
Thats all Sherk did in round 2, hold him against the cage
for the last minute of that round Dunham was teeing off on him
again, Dunham clearly won the last two rounds
Give me a break
Thats all Sherk did in round 2, hold him against the cage
for the last minute of that round Dunham was teeing off on him
again, Dunham clearly won the last two rounds
how do you think randy couture wins most of his fights? He grinded him against the cage and there was nothing Dunham could do. It may not be pretty, but he certainly controlled him.
Give me a break
Thats all Sherk did in round 2, hold him against the cage
for the last minute of that round Dunham was teeing off on him
again, Dunham clearly won the last two rounds
how do you think randy couture wins most of his fights? He grinded him against the cage and there was nothing Dunham could do. It may not be pretty, but he certainly controlled him.
that 3rd round should have been a 10-8 round
pure domination the last 2 rounds
You have every right to be mad, but no way should the 3rd be scored 10-8...especially with a takedown by sherk.
that 3rd round should have been a 10-8 round
pure domination the last 2 rounds
You have every right to be mad, but no way should the 3rd be scored 10-8...especially with a takedown by sherk.
You have every right to be mad, but no way should the 3rd be scored 10-8...especially with a takedown by sherk.
A takedown that Dunham got up from 10 seconds later.
Dunham prolly hit him with 30 bigtime shots that round.
Dunham clearly won the last two rounds. A few weak takedowns and surviving submissions doesnt win you rounds when you are getting tee'd off on for about 3 minutes of that round.
Theres already about 5 huge threads on sherdog about Dunham getting jobbed and winning the fight.
I gurantee you people that are saying it was a correct call had money on Sherk.
You have every right to be mad, but no way should the 3rd be scored 10-8...especially with a takedown by sherk.
A takedown that Dunham got up from 10 seconds later.
Dunham prolly hit him with 30 bigtime shots that round.
Dunham clearly won the last two rounds. A few weak takedowns and surviving submissions doesnt win you rounds when you are getting tee'd off on for about 3 minutes of that round.
Theres already about 5 huge threads on sherdog about Dunham getting jobbed and winning the fight.
I gurantee you people that are saying it was a correct call had money on Sherk.
im not saying dynham didnt get robbed....your fight isnt with me...I thought the fight was dunham's as well.
Im just saying that a 10-8 requires a royal ass beating, not just winning the round.
I can take you down 10 times and you can get up 10 times right away....but my takedowns are worth more to the judges...
im not saying dynham didnt get robbed....your fight isnt with me...I thought the fight was dunham's as well.
Im just saying that a 10-8 requires a royal ass beating, not just winning the round.
I can take you down 10 times and you can get up 10 times right away....but my takedowns are worth more to the judges...
im not saying dynham didnt get robbed....your fight isnt with me...I thought the fight was dunham's as well.
Im just saying that a 10-8 requires a royal ass beating, not just winning the round.
I can take you down 10 times and you can get up 10 times right away....but my takedowns are worth more to the judges...
There was only one takedown that round that and it lasted a whole 10 seconds. Its basically worthless in the grand scheme of the round seeing Dunham teed off on him for about 3 full minutes and landed so many quality strikes I couldnt keep count. If that one takedown lasted a full minute and Sherk did some damage with it, it would be a different story but that takedown was pretty much the most useless one of the entire fight.
what a shitty way to take away a young promising fighters perfect record.
im not saying dynham didnt get robbed....your fight isnt with me...I thought the fight was dunham's as well.
Im just saying that a 10-8 requires a royal ass beating, not just winning the round.
I can take you down 10 times and you can get up 10 times right away....but my takedowns are worth more to the judges...
There was only one takedown that round that and it lasted a whole 10 seconds. Its basically worthless in the grand scheme of the round seeing Dunham teed off on him for about 3 full minutes and landed so many quality strikes I couldnt keep count. If that one takedown lasted a full minute and Sherk did some damage with it, it would be a different story but that takedown was pretty much the most useless one of the entire fight.
what a shitty way to take away a young promising fighters perfect record.
don't knee me in the face because my hands are long enough to touch the ground, im 7ft tall but i cut weight to hit kids, when they stoped the fight for the cut Sherk was in a domonant position and when they started the fight back-up they had them start from the center of the ring if the 3rd round was 10-8 witch theres no way in hell it was, then round one was 10-8 for sherk, this isn't a bar fight if it was Sherk lost this is a MMA fight
don't knee me in the face because my hands are long enough to touch the ground, im 7ft tall but i cut weight to hit kids, when they stoped the fight for the cut Sherk was in a domonant position and when they started the fight back-up they had them start from the center of the ring if the 3rd round was 10-8 witch theres no way in hell it was, then round one was 10-8 for sherk, this isn't a bar fight if it was Sherk lost this is a MMA fight
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.