That quote above by Estulin really contradicts everything he says in the book. I'm really shocked to be honest and I'll have to read that speech in context later today when I get time
And please guys, don't knock the book and Estulin unless you've read it first. You can't argue something without knowing what the guy said/did first
I'm sorry but you cannot make this statement without reading the book, which I'm 100% sure you have not done.
Estulin describes seating charts for the yearly meetings, in-depth discussions that have taken place, and other very specific details about the on-goings of the Bilderbergs. I am 100% sure he has not made any of it up, and you would be too if you read the book.
As far as why this book was able to be published? Estulin is one of Canada's most well respected journalists. He's lived there since the early 90's, I believe. He has made it very public that he wants to expose the Bilderbergs before it's too late. He's had over a dozen attempts on his life since he started his crusade against them
And now people are willing to trade freedoms for safety. 
I'm glad I don't have children.
I'm sorry but you cannot make this statement without reading the book, which I'm 100% sure you have not done.
Estulin describes seating charts for the yearly meetings, in-depth discussions that have taken place, and other very specific details about the on-goings of the Bilderbergs. I am 100% sure he has not made any of it up, and you would be too if you read the book.
As far as why this book was able to be published? Estulin is one of Canada's most well respected journalists. He's lived there since the early 90's, I believe. He has made it very public that he wants to expose the Bilderbergs before it's too late. He's had over a dozen attempts on his life since he started his crusade against them
If this is such a cover-up? Then why hasn't anyone come forward and say something to the media??? In this country, people talk ALL THE TIME!!!
I just love up the people who believe this is a cover-up, make you have to prove the facts, and not the other way around.... It's not investigative reporting when you just throw up ideas/hypothesis about 9/11 events.
hey smdio: Show some physical evidence that this is a whole cover-up??? Oh wait, you can't. It's all hear-say and speculation. Again, I am sorry for your loss....
You are a very naive person, my friend.
No, his claims aren't true just because of "seating charts". In the book, he gives names of people that were murdered in order to give him information. These people were former Mi5 operatives, CIA agents, and the likes. I'm not going to sit here and try to prove something to you when you are 100% unwilling and closed-minded enough to not believe a word I say anyway. Why waste my time?
The FACTS are...
A religious miliant group being protected by the Taliban had a series of terrorist attacks in the early 90s up to the present with 9/11 being the biggest attack of them all. Bin Laden ordered a jihad on all America in 1996, I believe. The CIA was attempting to capture and/or kill Bin Laden before the attacks on 9/11 but they were unsuccessful. Over 3,000 people lost there lives on 9/11.
Oh and no, Estulin was never invited to the meetings. Almost all of his information provided in the book (which you won't read) has been given to him by actual members that were inside the meetings.
Maybe he paid them off, maybe they just gave it willingly. However he obtained it doesn't really matter to me.
You are a very naive person, my friend.
No, his claims aren't true just because of "seating charts". In the book, he gives names of people that were murdered in order to give him information. These people were former Mi5 operatives, CIA agents, and the likes. I'm not going to sit here and try to prove something to you when you are 100% unwilling and closed-minded enough to not believe a word I say anyway. Why waste my time?
I'm sorry but you cannot make this statement without reading the book, which I'm 100% sure you have not done.
Estulin describes seating charts for the yearly meetings, in-depth discussions that have taken place, and other very specific details about the on-goings of the Bilderbergs. I am 100% sure he has not made any of it up, and you would be too if you read the book.
As far as why this book was able to be published? Estulin is one of Canada's most well respected journalists. He's lived there since the early 90's, I believe. He has made it very public that he wants to expose the Bilderbergs before it's too late. He's had over a dozen attempts on his life since he started his crusade against them
Oh and no, Estulin was never invited to the meetings. Almost all of his information provided in the book (which you won't read) has been given to him by actual members that were inside the meetings.
Maybe he paid them off, maybe they just gave it willingly. However he obtained it doesn't really matter to me.
Who said that the Bilderbergs have denied their own existance? As a matter of fact, they have not. They openly admitt that the group exists, but they deny that what Estulin claims is true. They argue, instead, that the Group exists to keep peace amongst the world, by having world leaders meet and be able to talk openly and freely without the admittance of the Free Press and Media quoting their every word
The Bilderbergs are an upper class elite, not a group of mindless murderers, for fuck sake! They would not risk seeking out and killing an author and practically "outing themselves". The reason for the 9/11 attacks was to create fear amongst Americans. This attack was the first of several that will occur.
Daniel Estulin is not dead because the Bilderbergs do not want, nor need him dead.
And don't misquote me. I never said the Mi5 or CIA agents were killed by the Bilderbergs. When you swear an oath to keep confidential information classified, and you disobey that oath by releasing information and your employer finds out? You get killed. The Bilderbergs most likely had nothing to do with any of that
Who said that the Bilderbergs have denied their own existance? As a matter of fact, they have not. They openly admitt that the group exists, but they deny that what Estulin claims is true. They argue, instead, that the Group exists to keep peace amongst the world, by having world leaders meet and be able to talk openly and freely without the admittance of the Free Press and Media quoting their every word
The Bilderbergs are an upper class elite, not a group of mindless murderers, for fuck sake! They would not risk seeking out and killing an author and practically "outing themselves". The reason for the 9/11 attacks was to create fear amongst Americans. This attack was the first of several that will occur.
Daniel Estulin is not dead because the Bilderbergs do not want, nor need him dead.
And don't misquote me. I never said the Mi5 or CIA agents were killed by the Bilderbergs. When you swear an oath to keep confidential information classified, and you disobey that oath by releasing information and your employer finds out? You get killed. The Bilderbergs most likely had nothing to do with any of that
.........and calling this guy one of the most respected journalist in Canada is like saying Ryan Leaf is one of the most respceted QB's to have suited up in the NFL....
Who said that the Bilderbergs have denied their own existance? As a matter of fact, they have not. They openly admitt that the group exists, but they deny that what Estulin claims is true. They argue, instead, that the Group exists to keep peace amongst the world, by having world leaders meet and be able to talk openly and freely without the admittance of the Free Press and Media quoting their every word
The Bilderbergs are an upper class elite, not a group of mindless murderers, for fuck sake! They would not risk seeking out and killing an author and practically "outing themselves". The reason for the 9/11 attacks was to create fear amongst Americans. This attack was the first of several that will occur.
Daniel Estulin is not dead because the Bilderbergs do not want, nor need him dead.
And don't misquote me. I never said the Mi5 or CIA agents were killed by the Bilderbergs. When you swear an oath to keep confidential information classified, and you disobey that oath by releasing information and your employer finds out? You get killed. The Bilderbergs most likely had nothing to do with any of that
If this is such a cover-up? Then why hasn't anyone come forward and say something to the media??? In this country, people talk ALL THE TIME!!!
I just love up the people who believe this is a cover-up, make you have to prove the facts, and not the other way around.... It's not investigative reporting when you just throw up ideas/hypothesis about 9/11 events.
hey smdio: Show some physical evidence that this is a whole cover-up??? Oh wait, you can't. It's all hear-say and speculation. Again, I am sorry for your loss....
Let's also not forget that it wasn't the first act upon the WTC buildings. However, knowing what this type of devistation would in turn do could allow the intelligence to be discounted and then.......oooopppsss!!!
Here is an intersting read Link
"You will not contact your famlies ever again. We will give you new lives with unlimited access to whatever you desire. We will place you in a very undisclosed location and give you new identities. We will watch every move you make and monitor every minute of your daily lives. Should you contact your family or speak of this to anyone, we will kill both them, and you."
Would you agree? I don't think you would have a choice..
huge slip up, by now you must see the contradiction in that statement and wish it never left your backyard. I don't know if your father is alive or dead, but I don't believe your story about him. I think you made that up to gain sympathy from everyone and thought it would boost your credibility.
I see you just signed on this month, huh... wasn't it your plan to spring this on us after at least a good month of laying some ground work... tisk , tisk
oh, I must give you some credit, I loved how at the end of your first post you said, "...if you're too naive to believe something like this can and most likely has been staged, and you don't have anything constructive to bring to the discussion please find your way out of this thread without responding."
c'mon, hotshot, show us that devilish grin... I bet if you make it really obvious some of the old timers on here can still see it without their bifocals
huge slip up, by now you must see the contradiction in that statement and wish it never left your backyard. I don't know if your father is alive or dead, but I don't believe your story about him. I think you made that up to gain sympathy from everyone and thought it would boost your credibility.
I see you just signed on this month, huh... wasn't it your plan to spring this on us after at least a good month of laying some ground work... tisk , tisk
oh, I must give you some credit, I loved how at the end of your first post you said, "...if you're too naive to believe something like this can and most likely has been staged, and you don't have anything constructive to bring to the discussion please find your way out of this thread without responding."
c'mon, hotshot, show us that devilish grin... I bet if you make it really obvious some of the old timers on here can still see it without their bifocals
WTF is wrong with you?
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
