September 11, 2001 (long read)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dgJTR6ZR24

Enough said about WTC7, you all must absolutely admit that it fell for over 100 meters and over 2.5 seconds at freefall speed. 

NIST said it.  Video shows it. 

My question then becomes:

If WTC7 feel at freefall speed, how is it physically possible that the official explanation to the collapse was fire?

And if that was a lie, what else are they lying to us about?

Drizle, I can see you don't post a lot, so I appreciate you chiming in.  Even if you think I'm getting owned

I'm just looking for a couple answers, here.  I lost a very close friend of mine (my dad) that day, and it's really just a mission of mine to let everyone know what I believe to be the truth.  I'm completely aware that I won't convince even 1/4 of the people I talk to.  But even if I could open the eyes of 1 out of 100 people, that would be enough for me. 

I believe this country is a jaugernaut of force, capable of doing just about anything they wish, at any time they wish.  loss of innocent life is not important to them, so long as their goals of financial prosperity and world dominance is achieved.  I believe 9/11 served as a catastrophic event which furthered the need to rely on our government for protection, and gave certain groups a reason to go to war and make this country even stronger than we were before.

Al Quadia, a terrorist organization known not only for their total disregard for life, but also for complete chaos in terms of leadership and organization, would be the equivilant of and NBA Basketball team (the U.S. government, CIA, etc)  taking on one of your local High School teams.  But yet this High School team not only won the game, they pulled off one of the largest margin of victories ever seen in the NBA. 

Our government is lying to us:

1.)  Not a single video of Flight 77 hitting the pentagon, although 150+ cameras are focused on this builing at all times.

2.)  Donald Rumsfeld saying in a press conferance that Flight 93 was shot down

3.) President Bush claiming that he saw on TV the South Tower struck by an aircraft

4.) The government standing in the way of NIST researching the actual collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, and only letting them research "the events leading up to the attacks", not the actual attacks themselves.

5.)  80% of the steel from the WTC collapse buildings was immediately shipped overseas and melted in Asia.  This would be like conducting an autopsy without a body.

Too many things are misleading.  It absolutely REEKS of a coverup.  Yet people don't care!  Even if you slapped them in the face with proof of a coverup, they wouldn't want it to be true.  Certain people make a very good living and are comfortable with their lifestyle.  They don't want to live in fear that the government or other group of global elite are capable of disrupting their lifestyle. 

And that's fine.  I didn't really think I would get too far in this thread.  But at least I tried

Still haven't answered my question:  If a missile took out the pentagon, then why did they identify almost all the bodies from flight 77? 

Another Reilly/tpjw alias

Disgustingly obvious, I might add

I can't answer that.  Maybe the coroner was involved in a cover up as well, I'm not sure.

What I do know is, neither myself or you, or anyone else in this country other than the U.S. government has -ever- seen a video of an actual plane hitting the Pentagon. There are over 150 cameras focused on every single angle imaginable on the Pentagon, which is by FAR the most secure and patrolled building in the world. Yet we have absolutely NO video of Flight 77 crashing?  Hutch, doesn't that bother you a little bit?  Be honest man:  150+ cameras, security out the wazzou, contradicting witness testimony, inconsistant damage with an airliner strike. 

Non of that makes you question things?  And if it doesn't, why?  Because you say they found bodies? So the entire aircraft was disinigrated at impact, but they found bodies, and that's the reason you believe a plane hit the Pentagon.

That doesn't sound right to me man.  Sorry

I can't answer that.  Maybe the coroner was involved in a cover up as well, I'm not sure.

What I do know is, neither myself or you, or anyone else in this country other than the U.S. government has -ever- seen a video of an actual plane hitting the Pentagon. There are over 150 cameras focused on every single angle imaginable on the Pentagon, which is by FAR the most secure and patrolled building in the world. Yet we have absolutely NO video of Flight 77 crashing?  Hutch, doesn't that bother you a little bit?  Be honest man:  150+ cameras, security out the wazzou, contradicting witness testimony, inconsistant damage with an airliner strike. 

Non of that makes you question things?  And if it doesn't, why?  Because you say they found bodies? So the entire aircraft was disinigrated at impact, but they found bodies, and that's the reason you believe a plane hit the Pentagon.

That doesn't sound right to me man.  Sorry

Dozens of eyewitnesses say they saw a plane hit the pentagon.....there are tons of wreckage from the plane along with a bunch of bodies that were on that plane.  So you totally discount that in favor of some insane moron who says a missile hit it.  Whatever works for your little dream world. 

Your "evidence" consists of a select few mentally ill people who say it was a missile.  My evidence is testimony that is backed up by many people along with plane wreckage and body parts.

Quit complaining about what you don't have....and start looking at what you do have. 

Okay, so you have:

1.)  Wreckage and body parts

2.) Eyewitness testimony collaborating the Government's story and timeline

And I have:

1.)  Not a single video of a plane coming anywhere close to the Pentagon on 9/11/2001

2.)  Eyewitness testimony that contradicts the Government's story and timeline

But you think you're right, and I "absolutely must" be wrong

Great point, genious