Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Therefore - you should be fighting any system that judges murder to be worse than lying. You should be appalled and against the American and Australian justice systems.
WRONG!! where does it state in the bible that lying is worse than murdering?
WHERE?
Point that out where it says it....Rather, it doesnt make a statement at all regarding what is worse, THERFORE DO NOT MAKE A JUDGEMENT. If you think you know Christianity as half as you think you do, you will know that when i answered that murder is worse than lying, that i am in NO position to make that comment, because i have no compass to compare it to.....Rather, NO statement is made, if i were to make one i would be wrong...and you think you know Christianity? 
If you cannot judge that murder is worse than a lie, then how can courts? How can laws exist to support such a theory?
My Doctrine tells me NOT to judge, no matter..Even if i say murder is worse than Lying, what good is it? Am i going to send that soul to hell ? Am i in charge sending souls to either state? Your problem is that you think that my opinion matters, where as in Christianity, it doesnt....You commit a sin, God judges and God will allocate the soul - NOT ME, so why should i judge? Especially when the bible specifically tells me not to...
If i say lying is worse than raping, and i say i am a Chrstian, you will know i have NO AUTHORITY to say such thing because i am not the moral law giver.....
And you say you have an understanding of Christianity?
Its funny to me that you are so backed in to a corner about subjective morality that you are actually trying to say that you dont think murder is worse than a lie - but hey - I will take you at your word and ask you to consider that the whole world has laws, and according to you the way those laws are enforced is unenforceable by absolute morality.
Cant you see, in the world of OBJECTIVE morality, my opinion doesnt count...Do you know what objective morality means? If the objective law is do not steal, then even if we ALL think that stealing is ok, it doesnt matter what our opinion is, the objective law exists regardless of what we think
Subjective morality allows differentiation between murder and a lie, absolute morality does not.
Wrong! The bible says do not lie and not murder.....It doesnt say which one is worse, furthermore, it also says not to judge. There is only one judge....God has NOT REVEALED which one is worse fo rhis reasons, it could OBVIOUSLY very well be that murder is worse than lying, but God has not revealed it THEREFORE we are in NO position to make judgement.....
In the subjective world, if i say good on Anthony for what she did, you telling me that i am wrong is NO DIFFERENT to you going upto a person on the street who is enjoying a vanilla ice cream because she likes it more than chocolate is wrong....
Mate, i exhausted this with KK and he EVEN AGREED with me that under atheism, subjective moralism is exactly the way i have out it...Furthermore, i have discussed this with many atheists online, some with mjors in philosophy who also agree with me...Howeverm for some reason, you dont seem to understand...
You seem to think the terms subjective changes meaning....The definition of subjectisism stays the same regardless of what you apply it to...It is subjective...
I like the lakers - subjective, I like the Yankees - subjective, I like chocolate - subjective, I like Pizza - subjective, I hate olives - subjective, I like blonde girls - subjective, i like cute little boys, aged around 5 - subjective.
These are ALL PERSONAL OPINIONS, TASTES, PREFERENCES, they are all subjective, i am not wrong for liking chocolate, if the majority of society hate chocolate, i am NOT wrong then.....I like blonde girls, if the majority of society dont like blonde girls, i am NOT wrong for liking blonde girls...I like little cute boys aged around 5, , if the majority of society think that is wrong, i am not wrong for that taste or preference....
Subjective does NOT change when applied to different things....The definition stays the same......You have great difficultiy in understanding this, yet you are the ONLY non believer who has trouble understanding this for some reason...Popularity is not a measuring stick , thats the most ridicolous thing i have heard.....
Its ridiculous. And its funny how you have no way out.

Wrong - have a read, you really have trouble grasping the definition of subjective.......It doesnt change when applied to different things....I am not wrong for liking raw eggs, i am not wrong for liking little boys.......the population is not a measuring stick...
Subjective morality is absurd.......
Again, objective morality means morals and their values exist INDEPENDENTLY if i believe in them or not.....