Everyone knows I am 100% correct deep down but don't like it because:
1) I gave truth on a sensitive subject straight without sugar coating
2) You want to be left undisturbed in believing the narrative of what the government and media tell you that what was done was the right thing and something was achieved
3) You don't want your patriotic group think to be challenged with the rah rah uhhmerica #bostonstrong #thisourfukincity #wedidit bulllshittt
#dealwithit
0
Everyone knows I am 100% correct deep down but don't like it because:
1) I gave truth on a sensitive subject straight without sugar coating
2) You want to be left undisturbed in believing the narrative of what the government and media tell you that what was done was the right thing and something was achieved
3) You don't want your patriotic group think to be challenged with the rah rah uhhmerica #bostonstrong #thisourfukincity #wedidit bulllshittt
the country as a whole is as well but really on display in beantown
Yeah, it's a good thing the city went under martial law and spent 100s of millions to find a 19 yo kid (precedent is set). Oh yeah what a tough fuking city you are. Bunch of absolute pussiies at the control of daddy government.
What happens when it's a capable group who knows what they're doing..
Yeah, support the fact that his rights were nullified (precedent is set).
Yeah, then go out in the streets and chant USA like zombies that you were successful in shutting down the city under martial law at an insane cost to the taxpayer all to kill a kid who killed 2 people.
Yeah, then comeback and sing the national anthem all proud at Fenway like you stood strong and achieved something and get all pumped and say meaningless shittt like "this our fuking city" yeahyeah you showed them alright.
People are so stupid it's like a dream world.
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BarrelledIn:
the country as a whole is as well but really on display in beantown
Yeah, it's a good thing the city went under martial law and spent 100s of millions to find a 19 yo kid (precedent is set). Oh yeah what a tough fuking city you are. Bunch of absolute pussiies at the control of daddy government.
What happens when it's a capable group who knows what they're doing..
Yeah, support the fact that his rights were nullified (precedent is set).
Yeah, then go out in the streets and chant USA like zombies that you were successful in shutting down the city under martial law at an insane cost to the taxpayer all to kill a kid who killed 2 people.
Yeah, then comeback and sing the national anthem all proud at Fenway like you stood strong and achieved something and get all pumped and say meaningless shittt like "this our fuking city" yeahyeah you showed them alright.
People are so stupid it's like a dream world.
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
There is not a price tag when lives are at stake. If they did not spend the money to shut down the city and more lives were lost, could you imagine the outrage then? Give me a break, they did what they had to and the people of Boston are all staying strong together, in the wake of their friends and family going through this tragedy.. hindsight is always 20/20. You my friend have a distorted way of thinking..
0
Barrelledln what an idiotic and ignorant post...
There is not a price tag when lives are at stake. If they did not spend the money to shut down the city and more lives were lost, could you imagine the outrage then? Give me a break, they did what they had to and the people of Boston are all staying strong together, in the wake of their friends and family going through this tragedy.. hindsight is always 20/20. You my friend have a distorted way of thinking..
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
I agree with everything you're saying except for this point, There was a good way for these terrorists to get out of the city, They had 3 days to make an escape. The border to Canada was 80 miles, They could of been there by Tuesday morning, But the baffling thing is they had no escape plan.
I found an interesting tidbit on CNN the other day, A local car mechanic named Junior Gilberto who knew Dzokhar said the boy came round on Wednesday and told him he needed his car right now, The mechanic told him he hadn't finished working on it and Dzokhar was like it doesn't matter, I need it now etc etc. The mechanic gave him the keys to the car and he drove off, He thought Dzokhar must have been on drugs because he was acting twitchy,suspicious and not how he usually was like.
I personally think their escape plan had stalled whether the two brothers had a disagreement or the people who said they wanted in had a change of heart and went missing,switched their phones off. Then seeing their pictures on t.v. was obviously the final straw that broke the donkeys back.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
I agree with everything you're saying except for this point, There was a good way for these terrorists to get out of the city, They had 3 days to make an escape. The border to Canada was 80 miles, They could of been there by Tuesday morning, But the baffling thing is they had no escape plan.
I found an interesting tidbit on CNN the other day, A local car mechanic named Junior Gilberto who knew Dzokhar said the boy came round on Wednesday and told him he needed his car right now, The mechanic told him he hadn't finished working on it and Dzokhar was like it doesn't matter, I need it now etc etc. The mechanic gave him the keys to the car and he drove off, He thought Dzokhar must have been on drugs because he was acting twitchy,suspicious and not how he usually was like.
I personally think their escape plan had stalled whether the two brothers had a disagreement or the people who said they wanted in had a change of heart and went missing,switched their phones off. Then seeing their pictures on t.v. was obviously the final straw that broke the donkeys back.
Everyone knows I am 100% correct deep down but don't like it because:
1) I gave truth on a sensitive subject straight without sugar coating
2) You want to be left undisturbed in believing the narrative of what the government and media tell you that what was done was the right thing and something was achieved
3) You don't want your patriotic group think to be challenged with the rah rah uhhmerica #bostonstrong #thisourfukincity #wedidit bulllshittt
#dealwithit
I hardly trust our government as far as I can throw them, but there is something metaphorical about this.
Everyone knows I am 100% correct deep down but don't like it because:
1) I gave truth on a sensitive subject straight without sugar coating
2) You want to be left undisturbed in believing the narrative of what the government and media tell you that what was done was the right thing and something was achieved
3) You don't want your patriotic group think to be challenged with the rah rah uhhmerica #bostonstrong #thisourfukincity #wedidit bulllshittt
#dealwithit
I hardly trust our government as far as I can throw them, but there is something metaphorical about this.
There is not a price tag when lives are at stake. If they did not spend the money to shut down the city and more lives were lost, could you imagine the outrage then? Give me a break, they did what they had to and the people of Boston are all staying strong together, in the wake of their friends and family going through this tragedy.. hindsight is always 20/20. You my friend have a distorted way of thinking..
Exactly, it's so easier to post such an idiotic and ignorant post as a bystander living in place other than Watertown or Boston. i would like to see what he will post if there is a loose terrorist strolling his backward and carrying some sort of bombs and guns. Bet you he will cover his behind and ask for Feds to save him within a second.
0
Quote Originally Posted by daveyt25:
Barrelledln what an idiotic and ignorant post...
There is not a price tag when lives are at stake. If they did not spend the money to shut down the city and more lives were lost, could you imagine the outrage then? Give me a break, they did what they had to and the people of Boston are all staying strong together, in the wake of their friends and family going through this tragedy.. hindsight is always 20/20. You my friend have a distorted way of thinking..
Exactly, it's so easier to post such an idiotic and ignorant post as a bystander living in place other than Watertown or Boston. i would like to see what he will post if there is a loose terrorist strolling his backward and carrying some sort of bombs and guns. Bet you he will cover his behind and ask for Feds to save him within a second.
The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a
city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will
probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your
picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards
surrounding you.
the other side to this is the blueprint was publicized for how to accomplish terror. if two idiot punks could shut down the entire city with a poorly planned attack like this, imagine what professionals could do. i'm sure some of them took notes.
0
The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a
city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will
probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your
picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards
surrounding you.
the other side to this is the blueprint was publicized for how to accomplish terror. if two idiot punks could shut down the entire city with a poorly planned attack like this, imagine what professionals could do. i'm sure some of them took notes.
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
1. If amateurs cause this chaos, what will pros do is the point 2. If the bombers had half a brain they would have easily escaped and Boston would have shut down the city for nothing. 3. cool story 4. The precedent is set that Boston, and many major cities, will use martial law to diffuse a threat in the name of "public safety". Terrorists now know what a joke it is to get away from the useless inefficient government in a city like Boston. 5. for weak people 6. Of course not. Please take my rights and protect me daddy gov. I don't need them. I just want to be safe. And it snowballs and in 50 years we are in a full blown police state. 7. oh yeah caught some kids wtg
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I have no problem at all with how the authorities handled this case.
1. The FBI doesn't know if this is an "amatuer" or "professionals" when the bomb goes off.
2. Shutting down the city was the smartest thing they could have done. Why let the perps blend into the crowd and move around?
3. Yes, it was expensive, but there were 50 agencies involved at the federal, state, and city level, and they all worked 24 hours a day.
4. The precedent that has been set is that if you set off bombs in a city, there is no good way for you to get out of the city, they will probably have a picture of you placing the bomb, and once they put your picture in the mass media, you will soon have 100 squad cards surrounding you.
5. Nothing wrong with patriotism.
6. The civil liberties are not a huge issue to me. What is your problem? Not getting the Mirnada rights or the Martial Law? Unless they start routinely charging people as terrorist. The nature of the crime of putting bombs in a crowded area has to be terrorism. The government has been able to declare martial law since 1776.
7. They caught these guys in less than a week. That is something to be proud of. The Unabomber was mailing bombs for several years.
1. If amateurs cause this chaos, what will pros do is the point 2. If the bombers had half a brain they would have easily escaped and Boston would have shut down the city for nothing. 3. cool story 4. The precedent is set that Boston, and many major cities, will use martial law to diffuse a threat in the name of "public safety". Terrorists now know what a joke it is to get away from the useless inefficient government in a city like Boston. 5. for weak people 6. Of course not. Please take my rights and protect me daddy gov. I don't need them. I just want to be safe. And it snowballs and in 50 years we are in a full blown police state. 7. oh yeah caught some kids wtg
i bet a lot of the citizens of boston wish they didn't have such strict gun laws though while the terrorist was roaming the city. prob would have been nice to have a little protection in their home in case the terrorist came a knocking.
too bad the terrorists didn't adhere to the boston gun laws while they were shooting it out w/the police
0
i bet a lot of the citizens of boston wish they didn't have such strict gun laws though while the terrorist was roaming the city. prob would have been nice to have a little protection in their home in case the terrorist came a knocking.
too bad the terrorists didn't adhere to the boston gun laws while they were shooting it out w/the police
i bet a lot of the citizens of boston wish they didn't have such strict gun laws though while the terrorist was roaming the city. prob would have been nice to have a little protection in their home in case the terrorist came a knocking.
too bad the terrorists didn't adhere to the boston gun laws while they were shooting it out w/the police
they don't allow the people to have guns in boston?
0
Quote Originally Posted by cmo1037:
i bet a lot of the citizens of boston wish they didn't have such strict gun laws though while the terrorist was roaming the city. prob would have been nice to have a little protection in their home in case the terrorist came a knocking.
too bad the terrorists didn't adhere to the boston gun laws while they were shooting it out w/the police
they don't allow the people to have guns in boston?
1. If amateurs cause this chaos, what will pros do is the point 2. If the bombers had half a brain they would have easily escaped and Boston would have shut down the city for nothing. 3. cool story 4. The precedent is set that Boston, and many major cities, will use martial law to diffuse a threat in the name of "public safety". Terrorists now know what a joke it is to get away from the useless inefficient government in a city like Boston. 5. for weak people 6. Of course not. Please take my rights and protect me daddy gov. I don't need them. I just want to be safe. And it snowballs and in 50 years we are in a full blown police state. 7. oh yeah caught some kids wtg
Get some help. Soon. You need it, badly
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by BarrelledIn:
1. If amateurs cause this chaos, what will pros do is the point 2. If the bombers had half a brain they would have easily escaped and Boston would have shut down the city for nothing. 3. cool story 4. The precedent is set that Boston, and many major cities, will use martial law to diffuse a threat in the name of "public safety". Terrorists now know what a joke it is to get away from the useless inefficient government in a city like Boston. 5. for weak people 6. Of course not. Please take my rights and protect me daddy gov. I don't need them. I just want to be safe. And it snowballs and in 50 years we are in a full blown police state. 7. oh yeah caught some kids wtg
It turns out that Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev not only didn’t have
license to purchase weapons in Massachusetts, home to some of the
toughest gun laws in the nation according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, but they wouldn’t have qualified to own guns if they had applied.
Cambridge, Mass., police told Reuters they had not issued a gun license
to 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died after the firefight. The
police departments in both Cambridge and Dartmouth said they didn’t
issue 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev a firearms identification card,
which would’ve allowed him to own rifles holding less than 10 rounds and
shotguns. Dzhokhar, who is under 21, wasn’t eligible for a regular
handgun license.
how are those gun regulations working out for YOU in Boston?
Guess you need Bomb licenses too??? That way the scary bad guys won't be able to use bombs
D*** A** Liberals
0
It turns out that Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev not only didn’t have
license to purchase weapons in Massachusetts, home to some of the
toughest gun laws in the nation according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, but they wouldn’t have qualified to own guns if they had applied.
Cambridge, Mass., police told Reuters they had not issued a gun license
to 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died after the firefight. The
police departments in both Cambridge and Dartmouth said they didn’t
issue 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev a firearms identification card,
which would’ve allowed him to own rifles holding less than 10 rounds and
shotguns. Dzhokhar, who is under 21, wasn’t eligible for a regular
handgun license.
how are those gun regulations working out for YOU in Boston?
Guess you need Bomb licenses too??? That way the scary bad guys won't be able to use bombs
It turns out that Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev not only didn’t have
license to purchase weapons in Massachusetts, home to some of the
toughest gun laws in the nation according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, but they wouldn’t have qualified to own guns if they had applied.
Cambridge, Mass., police told Reuters they had not issued a gun license
to 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died after the firefight. The
police departments in both Cambridge and Dartmouth said they didn’t
issue 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev a firearms identification card,
which would’ve allowed him to own rifles holding less than 10 rounds and
shotguns. Dzhokhar, who is under 21, wasn’t eligible for a regular
handgun license.
how are those gun regulations working out for YOU in Boston?
Guess you need Bomb licenses too??? That way the scary bad guys won't be able to use bombs
D*** A** Liberals
The question you might want to ask is how Mass.gun laws have affected gun related crime and murders in that state.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cmo1037:
It turns out that Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev not only didn’t have
license to purchase weapons in Massachusetts, home to some of the
toughest gun laws in the nation according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, but they wouldn’t have qualified to own guns if they had applied.
Cambridge, Mass., police told Reuters they had not issued a gun license
to 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died after the firefight. The
police departments in both Cambridge and Dartmouth said they didn’t
issue 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev a firearms identification card,
which would’ve allowed him to own rifles holding less than 10 rounds and
shotguns. Dzhokhar, who is under 21, wasn’t eligible for a regular
handgun license.
how are those gun regulations working out for YOU in Boston?
Guess you need Bomb licenses too??? That way the scary bad guys won't be able to use bombs
D*** A** Liberals
The question you might want to ask is how Mass.gun laws have affected gun related crime and murders in that state.
Remember 911and the economic impact it had on our country like TSA, metal detectors at the airports and all the jobs created. We can thank 911 and all those terrorists.
0
Remember 911and the economic impact it had on our country like TSA, metal detectors at the airports and all the jobs created. We can thank 911 and all those terrorists.
While you're at it let me know how those strict gun laws are working in Detroit and Chicago as well
Here you go:
The state passed a comprehensive package of gun laws in 1998. And guess what?
In 2011, Massachusetts recorded 122 murders
committed with firearms, a striking increase from the 65 in 1998, said
Fox, the Northeastern professor. Nationwide, such murders increased only
3 percent from 1999 to 2010, the CDC says.
There were increases in other crimes involving
guns in Massachusetts, too. From 1998 to 2011, aggravated assaults with
guns rose 26.7 percent. Robberies with firearms increased 20.7 percent
during that period, according to an FBI analysis conducted for the
Globe.
While you're at it let me know how those strict gun laws are working in Detroit and Chicago as well
Here you go:
The state passed a comprehensive package of gun laws in 1998. And guess what?
In 2011, Massachusetts recorded 122 murders
committed with firearms, a striking increase from the 65 in 1998, said
Fox, the Northeastern professor. Nationwide, such murders increased only
3 percent from 1999 to 2010, the CDC says.
There were increases in other crimes involving
guns in Massachusetts, too. From 1998 to 2011, aggravated assaults with
guns rose 26.7 percent. Robberies with firearms increased 20.7 percent
during that period, according to an FBI analysis conducted for the
Globe.
A look farther back at the same FBI data, as previously reported elsewhere,
shows that firearms-related crimes have risen significantly in
Massachusetts, even since the state passed what is widely regarded as
one of the nation’s toughest gun control laws in 1998. Gun murders
almost doubled since then
Gun Control
0
A look farther back at the same FBI data, as previously reported elsewhere,
shows that firearms-related crimes have risen significantly in
Massachusetts, even since the state passed what is widely regarded as
one of the nation’s toughest gun control laws in 1998. Gun murders
almost doubled since then
And as more time passes, the worse Boston looks in this matter.
I agree with this sentiment:
What we saw instead was a city cowering in fear, led by two
particularly pusillanimous toads in Gov. Deval Patrick and Mayor Mumbles
Menino, who had the services of some 10,000 armed personnel —
literally, a small army — to take down… wait for it… a wounded teenager
with a gun, and maybe some self-detonating explosives.
Way to go, Boston. You’ve made all of us proud to be Americans.
And as more time passes, the worse Boston looks in this matter.
I agree with this sentiment:
What we saw instead was a city cowering in fear, led by two
particularly pusillanimous toads in Gov. Deval Patrick and Mayor Mumbles
Menino, who had the services of some 10,000 armed personnel —
literally, a small army — to take down… wait for it… a wounded teenager
with a gun, and maybe some self-detonating explosives.
Way to go, Boston. You’ve made all of us proud to be Americans.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Gun Control
Hot Forum Topics
