Crystal Light sugar free powdered drinks

college back in the 80s eh, well i bet that concoction was good nonetheless? hahha im in college right now and places like sams club and walmart still sell tang in the powder form

its good stuff

Yep, ignorant me believing the NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE

How much expertise can u possible have on the subject? Are you a researcher? A doctor? ......Nope, you google the shit and now wanna act like you are smart. I went to THE source of info to educate myself. Sorry it refutes your incorrect "theories"

And again, please show me where I am stating the relevance to Cancer...which by the way, how long did your National Cancer Institute take to admit the effects of smoking on their subject of expertise?

Train69 should use aspartame in every drink.  Please do...

This is from the national cancer insititute study on aspartame:

Specifically, about half a million AARP members (285,079 men and 188,905 women) who were 50 to 71 years old and living in eight study areas across the U.S. were given a questionnaire in 1995 and 1996. The participants were followed until the end of 2000

So the study was only done over a course of 5-6 years w/ the avg consumption of only 200mg daily.  Real intense study there.  I bet Equal and Sweet-n-low paid for the study.

Blah blah blah. You said it was a BIG differnce, like spleda is ok and asparatame cancer in powder form. Then I show you its bullshit. Then you show me an obscure website that shows side effects. Whoopty doo. Just about every food has "side effects". Eggs and peanut butter ring a bell? Cheese....Milk....meat.....

Give me a break. Dont drink soda cuz its gonna give you cancer but I bet you use a microwave and eat out of plastic containers and spray for bugs/weeds.....

Good luck avoiding cancer

Do you dream of Cancer...even if it isn't the topic of mention?  Continue to spin this thread as you like...amd dazzle everyone with your bullshit and ignorance

Not dazzling...educating. I'll take that as you admitting defeat

Furthest thing from defeat when you havent made a valid point yet.  Either you can't read...can't comprehend...or can't understand what is so obvious.  That you are totally ignorant.  Ist of all...your strike #1 you claim was due to the "generic" term of "Splenda".  I post a link to prove that "Splenda" is NOT generic and is different than aspartame.  So you attempt to say that I insinuate cancer.  Never did....in fact I am still waiting for you to cite the post where you clain I did.  You can't.  Then you claim Mercola to be a quack link; again, proving you know nothing about studies of toxic sweeteners or about Mercola himself.  As D Unit and other guys on this thread (as others to which you lend your one-sided ignorant expertise) state, your arguments are about as valid as rubber swords at a bullfight.  I am hardly admitting defeat when you in essence have not even thrown strike one yet...in fact, you've walked the bases loaded.  Keep trying though.  And expanding your database of ignorance

#1) I never said splenda was a generic term. If you read, I stated that I used that to encompass all artificial sweetners and shouldnt have. I even said "my bad" . Do you understand now? Its not that difficult.

#2) Before you got in this th

#2) before you entered this thread, D Unit stated that the psuedo sweetner in CL was "horrible" and that he was giving health advice. I then simply stated that he was incorrect and backed it up with a study from a credible source. I'm pretty sure every substance on earth has side effects for certain people....so whats the point? You then call them "toxic sweetners" ? Really? Toxic?

#3) I'm glad a website has over 100 side effects of asparatame. That is pretty absurd. To think that aspratame and only asparatme causes those things. It takes a combination of things. Not only that, the amount used in the products in miniscule.

#4) Dont be a sheep. You heard artificial sweetners were bad and you believed it. Not long ago eggs and meat were bad. Then tuna. Whats next?

#5) Get some ammo before you go to war. You little analogy was amusing because it described you. I havent heard you say anything of relevance yet....

#6) You are close to being added to my database of the ignorant.

#7) GAME OVER 

Game Over, LOL...you haven't posted anything credible yet other than your "I am right believe me" rhetoric...

Even Angelo Dundee had the sense to throw in the towel when Larry Holmes was beating Ali senseless...you should likewise by now have the sense to stay on the canvas.  Stay with the facts.  And with what was written.  Instead of trying to convince someone when the only way for you to do it is omit the facts...and make up your spin.  Go to war without ammo...check your gun pal, the clip is empty...

Maybe you have convinced yourself you are proving something here.  I'm starting to believe that you are actually frikn dumb enough to believe that.  You're the only one .  Ignorance is bliss.  You prove so everytime to attempt to spin another post.  This Game was Over as soon as you called Splenda "generic".  You just slam the exclamation point a bit harder every attempt to make to convince yourself that you're correct.  Maybe you actually think you are.  You'd be the only one following this thread to think that...

As far as relevance...re-read the thread...or better yet, grab someone that can read it to you without interjecting the subjective ignorance you seem to dwell on...

That is the definition of a weak, defeated comeback.

I havent posted anything credible? The National Cancer Institute isnt good enough for you? Try this then:

https://www.aspartame.org/aspartame_myths.html

This is my favorite part from that site....

"The overwhelming body of scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that aspartame, even in amounts many times what people typically consume, is safe and not associated with adverse aspartame side effects.The results of these studies overwhelmingly demonstrated that aspartame is not associated with adverse health effects, including headaches, seizures, changes in mood, cognition, or behavior, or allergic reactions. Despite the overwhelming documentation of aspartame’s safety, unfounded allegations that aspartame is associated with a myriad of ailments, including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and lupus, have continued to be spread via the Internet and the media by a few individuals who have no documented scientific or medical expertise."

Say something now.

My clip is empty cause I unloaded it on your ignorant ass. Looks like its swiss cheese for the ole white mouse tonight.

 I want you to tell me what "facts" I am omitting since you havent shown me ONE SINGLE bit of even half credible info. NOT ONE. Meanwhile I have given you the findings of the leading authority in cancer AND all the "facts" about asparatame.

If I am the only one that thinks I'm right then I probably am. How many times is almost everybody correct.....mmmm ZEROish....

Come on dude. Thats game, set and match.

  ....had one extra bullet.....

Nope you never mentioned cancer. Splenda and asparatame are different as I have already said twice. 2 nickels equals a dime.

Ok. So where is your proof that it cuases anything? I've provided you with answers to your questions that have no bearing, so lets get some substance from you. Got another interesting FACT for you:

damn thing wont copy. Heres the quote:

"The FDA, the Joint Expert Committe on Food Additives of the World Health Org, the American Medical Association, the American dietic Association and American Diabetes Association have reviewed asparatame and found it safe for use"