Posted:
#26
USC - 31 Boston College - 17
Trojans -7 
over 44
I can't see the pac 10 going 0-3. I think the Trojans can stop the bleeding and get the pac 10 a "W"...
Trojans ---- over
Boston College at Southern California (12/26/2009)
Posted:
#27
- The Southern California Trojans are ranked 59 on offense, averaging 385.1 yards per game. The Trojans are averaging 173.4 yards rushing and 211.7 yards passing so far this season.
- The Boston College Eagles are ranked 98 on offense, averaging 324.9 yards per game. The Eagles are averaging 140.5 yards rushing and 184.4 yards passing so far this season.
USC wins but can they cover? May stay with the OVER here.
Posted:
#31
no word yet if RB joe mckinght is a go for usc. BC,S rb montell harris has totaled 561 yds in his last 4 games, hes run for 1,355 yds and 13 tds this year. usc deff is giveing up a avg of 131 yds per game.one trend that is standing out to me is the eagles are 13-3 ats in there last 16 games as dog of 3.5 to 10. look for montell harris to have a big game and keep this one close
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by a1b2c3d4e5f6:
OK - so what is Part #2. And you really need to do some homework on just how awful CFB Teasrs really are. if you did you'd never play one again. They are stupid plays made by stupid people which you are in you play a CFB Teaser
Hmm. I have been using teatsers on NCAA FB as a safety valve when other plays are not a good idea. And I havew been hitting them.
BTW. This is not the best betting game on the planet.
Small play on BC SU because USC is so accustomed to BCS games. I think USC looks at this one as a downer. However I would be willing to bet BC is thrilled to be in ANY Bowl game.
Posted:
#35
USC opens it up with some players that you would not expect.
Too much talent, just underachieved (blew it) all year. Some new folks get a chance and Pete will ask those who want to play, to get busy too prove it...
when the smoke clears...USC wins as one of the few FAVS to do so and cover this Bowl Season thus far.
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:
Buying 15 for B.C.+21.5. F'nEagles have the slightly better defense and do well in Bowls historically.
bigeiii
Buying 15 for B.C.+21.5. F'nEagles have the slightly better defense and do well in Bowls historically.
bigeiii
Now that is funny Big........the kids first post is slamming one of the old timers who has proven time and time again to outlast the kid that posts 30 times during a bowl season and is never heard from again........what is it about this time of the year that brings out all the dinks???? Buck........take a long walk on a short peir brah! 
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:
Buying 15 for B.C.+21.5. F'nEagles have the slightly better defense and do well in Bowls historically.
bigeiii
Buying 15 for B.C.+21.5. F'nEagles have the slightly better defense and do well in Bowls historically.
bigeiii
Did well in bowls historically but much of that can be contributed to Tom O'Brien. 
At 7.5, they are begging us to take the Eagles and that might be the right play. I'm not buying this USC team's motivation in this situation. Playing in a letdown bowl game with the McKnight distraction. USC probably pulls this one out but I'll roll the dice on the hungrier team. The half point helps, not sure if I would play this game at 7.
BOL
Posted:
#45
o.k. I studied the stats and all that stuff. The other day I had UNR -11.5 and they got blown out by SMU. I remember a good Boise State team losing to B.C. on the Smurf Turf in the Humanitarian Bowl, I'll be the first in this thread to take B.C. on the Moneyline !!! I'll probably lose, but if I win, I Am Legend ! 
Hot Forum Topics
