Week 11 Money

Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

if you tell who you like then I’ll give a yay or nay, I can’t just toss out opinions so someone can have action for MACtion 

I like

M-OH & OV

NIU  & UN

So, with that being said, is there value in figuring out consistency and if they are trying to protect/promote one team? Also, in all of those games, they seemed to go over, or were atleast generally high scoring, so are they trying to help with the fireworks  of weekday MACtion? I'm no conspiracy theorist by any means, and I haven't watched some of these games as closely as you have. However, I have seen some very bad calls in these games, and I trust your judgement, so I defintely buy what youre selling. Just trying to see if there are any angles to find, haha... Mid typing this, this forum went haywire so if this is jumbled or has a bunch of jibberish at the end then i apologizethen again, I see a lot of bad calls missed/madcloangles, ha.

to finish my point, before covers decided to have a seizure, my angles on this game may play off your theory a little. I feel like Ohio and N illy are playing for championship aspirations, and should get the job done tonight. Also, N illy has only lost to P5 teams so I don't mind taking my chances on the short #, even though I feel like Toledo is getting hot at the right time. Toledo's D should allow N illy to move the ball a little more than they have recently, and I trust N illy (@home) to be able to make some stops when they need to, more than I do Toledo getting stops or boat racing illy. Miami OH has lost 2 very hard fought heartbreaker type games in as many weeks, so you have to ask if they can get it together emotionally. Playing off your theory, MAC would love to have OHIO vs BUFF midweek playing for a championship berth, that boosts their ratings. So, if the refs are gonna job anyone, it would stand to reason that it be Miami OH, correct? 

I definitely understand your point there. Please don't take my response as if I were calling you a conspiracy theorist as that was not my intention. I knew your stance on the MAC from previous posts, but appreciate the insight nonetheless.