No value posted here last week (6-8, .429). Over twelve; just four losing weeks – but with an overall unreflective of that record (79-73-1, .520). Peering into every game as usual, the box likes these for #13: 1) SMU(-2.5)/Louisville 2) KentState(+9)/CentralMich L 3) GeorgiaTech(-2.5)/Pittsburgh 4) Oklahoma(-7.5)/Missouri 5) JamesMadison(-13.5)/WashingtonSt 6) Texas(-10)/Arkansas 7) BoiseState(-16.5)/ColoradoSt 8) WakeForest(-18)/Delaware 9) SanDiegoSt(-11.5)/SanJoseSt 10) TexasSt( -18.5)/LA-Monroe 11) LA-Lafayette(+3)/ArkansasSt 12) UtahSt(+3)/FresnoSt 13) MiamiFlorida(-16.5)/VirTech 14) Hawaii(+3.5)/UNLV
Even though the algorithm’s first pick has held strong (8-4, .667), additional rank-value has been hard to come by this season (???). Conversely, any value lies in the volume.
One positive to share though. The system has been competitive throughout the season -- as measured by SpreadMargin (SM). Normally having the aforementioned robust volume, technical cappers normally have SM as a more-finite means of measuring performance.
For example, how competitive was that 6-8 outing last Saturday? Well, for starters, none of those losses exceeded the historical SM average of 12.2. And despite a losing week, the 14-game SM total was +19.5 points. Quantifiably, that far exceeds the -24.4 (2 x -12.2) that would be expected from an average two-loss outing. Geek stuff to be sure.....
Last week we had a seasonal high with 58 on the board. This week, even more opportunity – 60 games. And looking ahead to Thanksgiving #14, we'll crest at 66. Good luck, TheKingfish
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
No value posted here last week (6-8, .429). Over twelve; just four losing weeks – but with an overall unreflective of that record (79-73-1, .520). Peering into every game as usual, the box likes these for #13: 1) SMU(-2.5)/Louisville 2) KentState(+9)/CentralMich L 3) GeorgiaTech(-2.5)/Pittsburgh 4) Oklahoma(-7.5)/Missouri 5) JamesMadison(-13.5)/WashingtonSt 6) Texas(-10)/Arkansas 7) BoiseState(-16.5)/ColoradoSt 8) WakeForest(-18)/Delaware 9) SanDiegoSt(-11.5)/SanJoseSt 10) TexasSt( -18.5)/LA-Monroe 11) LA-Lafayette(+3)/ArkansasSt 12) UtahSt(+3)/FresnoSt 13) MiamiFlorida(-16.5)/VirTech 14) Hawaii(+3.5)/UNLV
Even though the algorithm’s first pick has held strong (8-4, .667), additional rank-value has been hard to come by this season (???). Conversely, any value lies in the volume.
One positive to share though. The system has been competitive throughout the season -- as measured by SpreadMargin (SM). Normally having the aforementioned robust volume, technical cappers normally have SM as a more-finite means of measuring performance.
For example, how competitive was that 6-8 outing last Saturday? Well, for starters, none of those losses exceeded the historical SM average of 12.2. And despite a losing week, the 14-game SM total was +19.5 points. Quantifiably, that far exceeds the -24.4 (2 x -12.2) that would be expected from an average two-loss outing. Geek stuff to be sure.....
Last week we had a seasonal high with 58 on the board. This week, even more opportunity – 60 games. And looking ahead to Thanksgiving #14, we'll crest at 66. Good luck, TheKingfish
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.