@SharpeBettor
Based on what source?
@badlands
The worst thing that ever happened was opening up online betting. It feels like 90% of the individuals who have joined this are no longer living in reality and believe that unless they hit 100% of their wagers, there must be some underlying reasons why they lost. They can't accept failure and pout about it every week. Then instead of analyzing matchups and key components to the game, they have a magnifying glass stuck up against their computer screen hoping to solve the riddle on Covers instead or accusing the refs of having earpieces that have a direct line to Vegas. Brutal
There are few of ones like you left BAD's. Good luck tonight. ![]()
@badlands
The worst thing that ever happened was opening up online betting. It feels like 90% of the individuals who have joined this are no longer living in reality and believe that unless they hit 100% of their wagers, there must be some underlying reasons why they lost. They can't accept failure and pout about it every week. Then instead of analyzing matchups and key components to the game, they have a magnifying glass stuck up against their computer screen hoping to solve the riddle on Covers instead or accusing the refs of having earpieces that have a direct line to Vegas. Brutal
There are few of ones like you left BAD's. Good luck tonight. ![]()
LMFAOOOOOOOOO
Yeah...
Saw same Pic on FB yesterday.....
Ive been riding this B10 team all year...
Power ratings have IU by 4
SOS is close
IU #1
ORE#3
HOOSIERS for me also
Bol BAD$$$$$$$$
![]()
LMFAOOOOOOOOO
Yeah...
Saw same Pic on FB yesterday.....
Ive been riding this B10 team all year...
Power ratings have IU by 4
SOS is close
IU #1
ORE#3
HOOSIERS for me also
Bol BAD$$$$$$$$
![]()
Shut up.
Shut up.
@badlands
Oh no doubt. They rank near the top in success rate allowed — a stalwart unit for sure. Love em. They got 6 sacks on the duckeroonies last time as well. They're, No joke.
I think Oregon coaches have been talking about wrinkles and adjustments since that October loss and probably haven't slept since. Schematic changes are coming for sure, This won't be a carbon copy. Only 9 of 30+ postseason rematches resulted in the same winner. Regression, Revenge. Gimme the Ducks and the 3. And Ducks +9 Under 56.5 in a rare teaser.
@badlands
Oh no doubt. They rank near the top in success rate allowed — a stalwart unit for sure. Love em. They got 6 sacks on the duckeroonies last time as well. They're, No joke.
I think Oregon coaches have been talking about wrinkles and adjustments since that October loss and probably haven't slept since. Schematic changes are coming for sure, This won't be a carbon copy. Only 9 of 30+ postseason rematches resulted in the same winner. Regression, Revenge. Gimme the Ducks and the 3. And Ducks +9 Under 56.5 in a rare teaser.
Everyone looks at Indiana as a basketball ball school like Kentucky and maybe Duke. Look into the eyes of Cignetti, the Hoosiers are not the prey.
Everyone looks at Indiana as a basketball ball school like Kentucky and maybe Duke. Look into the eyes of Cignetti, the Hoosiers are not the prey.
You’re likely correct on your assumption that Indians wins tonight, but to say Oregons defense didn’t shut down Texas Tech would be crazy. They won that game and looked good doing it. I understand you lost your bet and it could be so grapes but just hoping for a good game.
You’re likely correct on your assumption that Indians wins tonight, but to say Oregons defense didn’t shut down Texas Tech would be crazy. They won that game and looked good doing it. I understand you lost your bet and it could be so grapes but just hoping for a good game.
Not only what badlands just posted above but isnt Oregon missing almost their entire backfield for tonight. Noah is a gametime decsion and then their RBs 2-4 are all out for injury or entering the portal. Surely that makes for a fairly concerning factor when picking Oregon to win. Indiana has a stellar defense. If they only have to concentrate on a one dimensional offense I dont see them being able to put many points on the board.
Not only what badlands just posted above but isnt Oregon missing almost their entire backfield for tonight. Noah is a gametime decsion and then their RBs 2-4 are all out for injury or entering the portal. Surely that makes for a fairly concerning factor when picking Oregon to win. Indiana has a stellar defense. If they only have to concentrate on a one dimensional offense I dont see them being able to put many points on the board.
In all actuality.. 53% of the money is on Oregon as of writing . Yes we all know sharps are on Oregon but so are the bigger bets and the money %.. I will take side of Bads and the books on this one.
In all actuality.. 53% of the money is on Oregon as of writing . Yes we all know sharps are on Oregon but so are the bigger bets and the money %.. I will take side of Bads and the books on this one.
Indiana looked good last week, Alabama looked lost especially on Defense, Plays was getting called in late. I just hoping for a good game and Over is my pick. Gl everyone.
Indiana looked good last week, Alabama looked lost especially on Defense, Plays was getting called in late. I just hoping for a good game and Over is my pick. Gl everyone.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.