That poker analogy is quoted and came from a mind 10,000 light years away from yours in terms of gambling expertise.
It’s like, unbeknownst to you, grading a random physics paper as a high school teacher...but it’s from young Einstein...and you give it...a C-
The quote is fine and true, but your application to the UCF/Memphis game is flawed from the get go.....
You claimed UCF sucked out. Problem is, UCF was a favorite pre flop, and a big one according to vegas. Therefore, Memphis would have to suck out to win. UCF catching on the turn or river isnt a suck out.
So you analogy is just bad. Youre the guy holding 8/9 vs AK and the flop comes 8/2/4...you shout YES!!!
.....turn 6..still good!
.....river A.....bye bye money....
You sit there claiming bad beat / suck out....when you will lose that hand way more often than not. AK vs 89 is actually closer than UCF -9.5 vs Memphis was....probably AK vs 58.....
I see you understand poker as well as football...
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
That poker analogy is quoted and came from a mind 10,000 light years away from yours in terms of gambling expertise.
It’s like, unbeknownst to you, grading a random physics paper as a high school teacher...but it’s from young Einstein...and you give it...a C-
The quote is fine and true, but your application to the UCF/Memphis game is flawed from the get go.....
You claimed UCF sucked out. Problem is, UCF was a favorite pre flop, and a big one according to vegas. Therefore, Memphis would have to suck out to win. UCF catching on the turn or river isnt a suck out.
So you analogy is just bad. Youre the guy holding 8/9 vs AK and the flop comes 8/2/4...you shout YES!!!
.....turn 6..still good!
.....river A.....bye bye money....
You sit there claiming bad beat / suck out....when you will lose that hand way more often than not. AK vs 89 is actually closer than UCF -9.5 vs Memphis was....probably AK vs 58.....