Posted:
#51
Bumpy!
OHIO ST / USC BREAKDOWN
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by fightintigraz:
USC has NFL players at evry position. To me they are much faster on both sides of the ball. There RB situation is bar none the best in College football.. I saw them wax Virgina like evryone else and as impressed as I was by USC coming out the gates swinging, I thought Virgina looked like shit.It was one of those games that everything went wrong for one side, and everything went right for the other..But it was only ONE GAME...I still reserve judgment on Sanchez..I think we will really know what hes made of after this..This Ohio Staste team is pure power..They have big agressive D that will blitz the hell out of USC. There O is made up of a huge line and, if he plays the best power RB in college football...Now while im not as impressed with Boeckman as most , I am impressed by the freshman Pyror..Looks like Vince Young has been reincarnted in this guy..If he gets some reps could be a x factor..I think this game will be closer then most think..
Any Thoughts?
Lets see if im right ..I chickened out of taking the points ,but got the under...GL TO ALL...
Posted:
#56
Quote Originally Posted by wagerfund:
I'm a USC guy, but sorry, I just don't buy that USC is that much faster then OSU. We don't really have a speed burner at wide out beyond RoJo and you aren't going to consider him a track guy. McKnight has nice wheels but is no Bush in that department and beyond that their isn't a RB that will run away from you. Griffen on the D-Line is very quick and our LB's are very quick beyond Cushing who has average speed. Taylor Mays is actually our big speed guy and he is a safety. Honestly, you can't even say that our CB's are speed burners. The whole team can run, but their isn't a holy crap guy on the team that plays significant time.
As for OSU vs. LSU (LSU home game) and Florida (FLA D-line and Tebow blew up that game) the speed thing is just a general statement. Hell, that same Florida team that crushed OSU got beat by Michigan the following year in a bowl game. The combination of speed AND size kills..both teams have plenty of both.
You still feel this way wagerfund? USC has football speed. They might not be track guys, but with the pads on, they are lights out!
I love you Mark Sanchez
Posted:
#57
Godfather...
you are not allowed to come on to game threads and message boards and talk mountains and mountains of shit about a game (and in turn giving a lot of people a lot of bad information) and then fucking disappear until you do the same thing next year...
bring your ass back onto this thread, and bow down before all of the betting gurus that told you how this game would go... to the letter! i've heard your OSU - breathing ignorant ass for too long...
eat some crow, dude!
Posted:
#58
Quote Originally Posted by Godfather16:
This team is not even close to the talent level of the 2005 team, you had several top picks, you had Leinhart and Bush who were among the best ever at their positions. Don't really see that for USC this year, they are hyped as usual, but these are the same guys that lost to A Pathetic Stanford team, last year, and an Oregon team that was basically the QB and little else.
OUTSTANDING!
come back and give us your new opinion...
over-hyped? yea... USC is the team that was over-hyped coming into this year...
will we ever hear you admit that your team is a joke when it comes to playing on the national stage? have you figured that out yet?
Ohio St is a joke when it comes to play a real college football team!
PERIOD!
Posted:
#61
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Honestly? I think USC has a lot of good players on offense, but not great. Their D is another story. Their speed at every position will be greater than tohio st.'s..........as well as their depth. Pryor didn't impress me much. He's not as fast as I was led to believe & I certainly wouldn't compare him to VY right now. I didn't see where tohio st was able to overpower ohio on any sort of a regular basis in that game. In fact, I was surprised at how well ohio was able to hold their own at the LOS on both sides.
I've watched both games twice & I don't see any positions where tohio st has any advantage........
Honestly? I think USC has a lot of good players on offense, but not great. Their D is another story. Their speed at every position will be greater than tohio st.'s..........as well as their depth. Pryor didn't impress me much. He's not as fast as I was led to believe & I certainly wouldn't compare him to VY right now. I didn't see where tohio st was able to overpower ohio on any sort of a regular basis in that game. In fact, I was surprised at how well ohio was able to hold their own at the LOS on both sides.
I've watched both games twice & I don't see any positions where tohio st has any advantage........
Posted:
#63
I think the only breakdown was suffered by Duh Ohio State.......
In hindsight, there was a lot of good info on this thread, and a lot not so good.
If we're smart, we'll try and take away the good, and learn from it, rather than point fingers (although I WILL make an exception for GF16-who has now been reduced to GF9.99)
GLTA
Hot Forum Topics
