2. Nevada Wolfpack (2H) TT OVER 16.5 (-115), 2.3 to win 2
Nevada will hit 17 or 21, Cal hasn't shown any reason in this first half to imagine that they will be able to stop the Nevada offense. Second half adjustments won't be able to do it.
chalk it up
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Adding:
2. Nevada Wolfpack (2H) TT OVER 16.5 (-115), 2.3 to win 2
Nevada will hit 17 or 21, Cal hasn't shown any reason in this first half to imagine that they will be able to stop the Nevada offense. Second half adjustments won't be able to do it.
Oh, and let me just say how I am fully expecting another ass-kicking blowout this weekend in the Rose Bowl -- Projected score of Houston 44, UCLA 17
I'm on Houston big myself. Even if Case Keenum is out, Cotton Turner should fill the gap nicely. The pace of play on Houtson's offense will have UCLA defense breathing heavy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Oh, and let me just say how I am fully expecting another ass-kicking blowout this weekend in the Rose Bowl -- Projected score of Houston 44, UCLA 17
I'm on Houston big myself. Even if Case Keenum is out, Cotton Turner should fill the gap nicely. The pace of play on Houtson's offense will have UCLA defense breathing heavy.
kalind, billy (pac-10 love), lakers -- thanks for stopping in guys
ctoy -- tough loss for your boys last night, as you can see earlier in this thread I thought they would come out on top. I don't see how this UCLA/Houston line isn't like Houston -6 or even -7. UCLA has not look inspired in either game this year in my opinion. They played "ok" at Kansas State, and by "ok", I mean they gave up a career day to the opposing running back and had receivers dropping easy catches left and right. They are getting destroyed at the line of scrimmage defensively, something that was clearly apparent with the Stanford game. If you lose the battle at the line of scrimmage, all other things equal, you'll probably lose the games 7-8 out of ten times, probably even more if you really thought about it. UCLA is losing that battle in their two games so far, and if they continue to do the same against Houston, the Houston skill players will eat them alive. I think UCLA has the speed and athleticism in the secondary to at least match up well with Houston guys, but Houston just strikes me as a more disciplined team, far better coached, they play hard... all things that UCLA is not really doing well. And I haven't even mentioned the putrid UCLA offense so far. I can understand the defense giving up 35 to Stanford's offense at home, but not even getting a point on the board? That's ridiculous. Kevin Prince hasn't been the same since he got his jaw broken (I believe at Tennesee on the road) last year. Maybe he's been injured like he's been saying, but if that's the case, why the hell are Neuheisel and Chow letting him play? I give them credit for yanking him for Brehaut (who didn't look any better) against Stanford, but its not like that helped the situation as the zero points on the scoreboard said. I think we're looking at a 48-17 type game here. I don't see how Houston doesn't get in the end zone at least 5 times.... might even have to add some Houston TT OVER 34 or something.
0
kalind, billy (pac-10 love), lakers -- thanks for stopping in guys
ctoy -- tough loss for your boys last night, as you can see earlier in this thread I thought they would come out on top. I don't see how this UCLA/Houston line isn't like Houston -6 or even -7. UCLA has not look inspired in either game this year in my opinion. They played "ok" at Kansas State, and by "ok", I mean they gave up a career day to the opposing running back and had receivers dropping easy catches left and right. They are getting destroyed at the line of scrimmage defensively, something that was clearly apparent with the Stanford game. If you lose the battle at the line of scrimmage, all other things equal, you'll probably lose the games 7-8 out of ten times, probably even more if you really thought about it. UCLA is losing that battle in their two games so far, and if they continue to do the same against Houston, the Houston skill players will eat them alive. I think UCLA has the speed and athleticism in the secondary to at least match up well with Houston guys, but Houston just strikes me as a more disciplined team, far better coached, they play hard... all things that UCLA is not really doing well. And I haven't even mentioned the putrid UCLA offense so far. I can understand the defense giving up 35 to Stanford's offense at home, but not even getting a point on the board? That's ridiculous. Kevin Prince hasn't been the same since he got his jaw broken (I believe at Tennesee on the road) last year. Maybe he's been injured like he's been saying, but if that's the case, why the hell are Neuheisel and Chow letting him play? I give them credit for yanking him for Brehaut (who didn't look any better) against Stanford, but its not like that helped the situation as the zero points on the scoreboard said. I think we're looking at a 48-17 type game here. I don't see how Houston doesn't get in the end zone at least 5 times.... might even have to add some Houston TT OVER 34 or something.
I already feel like I'm dead with Alabama/Duke UNDER -- 31 points in the first quarter sucks. When kalind put his totals out and was on the other side I knew I was in trouble.
0
I already feel like I'm dead with Alabama/Duke UNDER -- 31 points in the first quarter sucks. When kalind put his totals out and was on the other side I knew I was in trouble.
7. Nebraska Cornhuskers/Washington Huskies (2H) OVER 27 (-110), 3.3 to win 3 -- Huskies can't tackle and I think Lockers can get the Huskies another 14 points in the 2H
0
Adding:
7. Nebraska Cornhuskers/Washington Huskies (2H) OVER 27 (-110), 3.3 to win 3 -- Huskies can't tackle and I think Lockers can get the Huskies another 14 points in the 2H
kalind, billy (pac-10 love), lakers -- thanks for stopping in guys
ctoy -- tough loss for your boys last night, as you can see earlier in this thread I thought they would come out on top. I don't see how this UCLA/Houston line isn't like Houston -6 or even -7. UCLA has not look inspired in either game this year in my opinion. They played "ok" at Kansas State, and by "ok", I mean they gave up a career day to the opposing running back and had receivers dropping easy catches left and right. They are getting destroyed at the line of scrimmage defensively, something that was clearly apparent with the Stanford game. If you lose the battle at the line of scrimmage, all other things equal, you'll probably lose the games 7-8 out of ten times, probably even more if you really thought about it. UCLA is losing that battle in their two games so far, and if they continue to do the same against Houston, the Houston skill players will eat them alive. I think UCLA has the speed and athleticism in the secondary to at least match up well with Houston guys, but Houston just strikes me as a more disciplined team, far better coached, they play hard... all things that UCLA is not really doing well. And I haven't even mentioned the putrid UCLA offense so far. I can understand the defense giving up 35 to Stanford's offense at home, but not even getting a point on the board? That's ridiculous. Kevin Prince hasn't been the same since he got his jaw broken (I believe at Tennesee on the road) last year. Maybe he's been injured like he's been saying, but if that's the case, why the hell are Neuheisel and Chow letting him play? I give them credit for yanking him for Brehaut (who didn't look any better) against Stanford, but its not like that helped the situation as the zero points on the scoreboard said. I think we're looking at a 48-17 type game here. I don't see how Houston doesn't get in the end zone at least 5 times.... might even have to add some Houston TT OVER 34 or something.
Tell me about it. I knew as soon as Riley starting throwing the ball, we would be in trouble. No idea how or why we did not stick with running the ball. Horrible QB, questionable coaching decisions, and a defense unable to read anything. Got to give major props to Nevada! As far as Houston vs UCLA tonight, I am on the same page with you. UCLA seems so lifeless right now. Never thought I would ever see UCLA like this. GL with the rest of your play today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
kalind, billy (pac-10 love), lakers -- thanks for stopping in guys
ctoy -- tough loss for your boys last night, as you can see earlier in this thread I thought they would come out on top. I don't see how this UCLA/Houston line isn't like Houston -6 or even -7. UCLA has not look inspired in either game this year in my opinion. They played "ok" at Kansas State, and by "ok", I mean they gave up a career day to the opposing running back and had receivers dropping easy catches left and right. They are getting destroyed at the line of scrimmage defensively, something that was clearly apparent with the Stanford game. If you lose the battle at the line of scrimmage, all other things equal, you'll probably lose the games 7-8 out of ten times, probably even more if you really thought about it. UCLA is losing that battle in their two games so far, and if they continue to do the same against Houston, the Houston skill players will eat them alive. I think UCLA has the speed and athleticism in the secondary to at least match up well with Houston guys, but Houston just strikes me as a more disciplined team, far better coached, they play hard... all things that UCLA is not really doing well. And I haven't even mentioned the putrid UCLA offense so far. I can understand the defense giving up 35 to Stanford's offense at home, but not even getting a point on the board? That's ridiculous. Kevin Prince hasn't been the same since he got his jaw broken (I believe at Tennesee on the road) last year. Maybe he's been injured like he's been saying, but if that's the case, why the hell are Neuheisel and Chow letting him play? I give them credit for yanking him for Brehaut (who didn't look any better) against Stanford, but its not like that helped the situation as the zero points on the scoreboard said. I think we're looking at a 48-17 type game here. I don't see how Houston doesn't get in the end zone at least 5 times.... might even have to add some Houston TT OVER 34 or something.
Tell me about it. I knew as soon as Riley starting throwing the ball, we would be in trouble. No idea how or why we did not stick with running the ball. Horrible QB, questionable coaching decisions, and a defense unable to read anything. Got to give major props to Nevada! As far as Houston vs UCLA tonight, I am on the same page with you. UCLA seems so lifeless right now. Never thought I would ever see UCLA like this. GL with the rest of your play today.
I like it a lot, b18. Then again, I've been ice cold so far today for the most part, so take that with a grain of salt. Stanford does such a good job winning the battle at the line of scrimmage
0
I like it a lot, b18. Then again, I've been ice cold so far today for the most part, so take that with a grain of salt. Stanford does such a good job winning the battle at the line of scrimmage
1. East Carolina Pirates +20 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 2. Alabama Crimson Tide/Duke Blue Devils UNDER 57.5 (-105), 2.1 to win 2 3. Southern Methodist University Mustangs -23 (-105), 1.05 to win 1 4. Washington Huskies ML (+130), 1 to win 1.3 5. Houston Cougars -4 (-104), 2.08 to win 2 6. Stanford Cardinal -17.5 (-107), 1.07 to win 1
7. Nebraska Cornhuskers/Washington Huskies (2H) OVER 27 (-110), 3.3 to win 3 8. Houston Cougars TT OVER 34 (-130), 2.6 to win 2 9. Stanford Cardinal (1H) -10 (-110), 2.2 to win 2 10. Stanford Cardinal (2H) -7 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 11. Stanford Cardinal (2H) TT OVER 16 (-110), 2.2 to win 2
I posted the last three in the Late Night degenerate thread on the Stanford game but didn't list my units, they are completely legit though (will post units in other threads in the future as well to clear up any confusion). Rough start to the day for me on Saturday... just updating for record keeping purposes:
Saturday overall: 5-6, -0.93 units Pac-10 games: 4-4, -0.73 units UCLA games: 0-2, -4.68 units YTD: 20-15, +4.48 units Pac-10 record: 11-6, +8.06 units UCLA record: 4-2, +3.32 units
0
1. East Carolina Pirates +20 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 2. Alabama Crimson Tide/Duke Blue Devils UNDER 57.5 (-105), 2.1 to win 2 3. Southern Methodist University Mustangs -23 (-105), 1.05 to win 1 4. Washington Huskies ML (+130), 1 to win 1.3 5. Houston Cougars -4 (-104), 2.08 to win 2 6. Stanford Cardinal -17.5 (-107), 1.07 to win 1
7. Nebraska Cornhuskers/Washington Huskies (2H) OVER 27 (-110), 3.3 to win 3 8. Houston Cougars TT OVER 34 (-130), 2.6 to win 2 9. Stanford Cardinal (1H) -10 (-110), 2.2 to win 2 10. Stanford Cardinal (2H) -7 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 11. Stanford Cardinal (2H) TT OVER 16 (-110), 2.2 to win 2
I posted the last three in the Late Night degenerate thread on the Stanford game but didn't list my units, they are completely legit though (will post units in other threads in the future as well to clear up any confusion). Rough start to the day for me on Saturday... just updating for record keeping purposes:
Saturday overall: 5-6, -0.93 units Pac-10 games: 4-4, -0.73 units UCLA games: 0-2, -4.68 units YTD: 20-15, +4.48 units Pac-10 record: 11-6, +8.06 units UCLA record: 4-2, +3.32 units
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
