Posted:
#26
also the over in the USC/San Jose st game looks good, hell USC should get close to 48 , or more i hate unders lol
151
0
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
Posted:
#31
BOL RUM!
Agree NC should cover game line of +8.5. like TCU 1st half -4.5. (Feel a 17-10 type score at the break). Also took Under 46.5 for game and a 3 way parlay each all small 1/2 units. after I put it in NC dropped to +7.5 should be a good game!
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.”
0
Posted:
#32
@Craginator
yes just seen that the line is back down to 7.5 , not sure what the outcome will be but as far as getting the best line i could for who i liked i did a good job, thought it would go up and waited and got 10, and then it drops back down, and the whole point of handicapping is also trying to get yourself the best line possible, we cannot control what happens when the game starts..lol except maybe betting live , i think most of the line moves here were just action, wave of TCU bets pushed it up, then action came in on N,C, i made it a smaller play also 1st couple of weeks is just getting a feel on who teams are ......wishing you the best this year
Over 59.5 USC -120
N Car +10 smaller
NC st +4.5 -115
still looking into UNLV already talked about them a little , talked with my friends out west last night on our weekly call get some good info still debating...a few guys had some thoughts about the E Mich/Sac st game im hearing EMU has a lot of starters back, very good QB so looking into that also
gl
151
0
Posted:
#36
Nice to see UNC play well. ML was the play, and TCU backers can't bitch they even got the turnovers and the breaks ..yet unc wins outright...just glad I was on them i almost started believing what tcu backers were saying...lol.
This usc game looking like a 48-0 type of game. I was hoping san Jose would get 10 pts
Nc st turns it over on a tipped pass but they are not doing much anyway ....still liking unlv tonight have not bet it yet
Gl everyone
151
0
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by FloatinPicks:
Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson: Belichick, will he dance an Irish Jig? you mean Billy B? I guess nobody remembers his last 2 years in New England. Or the fact that his SON not Billy B runs the Defense, and NE's defense was horrible those last 2 years . i guess nobody considered the fact that almost every tough team UNC faced LY they got scrubbed clean. but then everyone brings up the DUKE game, omg its a rivalry game. last 2 games in Dublin , 3 pt games, yes, but did you look at the matchups? very familiar competitive teams. Nobody talks about the blowout from 3 years ago Navy vs ND, mismatched, and i think Notre Dame blew them out 3 times in Ireland. bottom line : look at the matchups. i just think its funny that ppl on covers keep lookin a gift horse in the mouth. And all the guys actually posting their "look at me" im taking UNC, jokers lol im 100 on TCU, im not as old as all you guys here, but i know this these two, teams and the coaches as well
you apparently DO NOT know these two teams and coaches as well as you thought. GLuck going forward. Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson: Belichick, will he dance an Irish Jig? you mean Billy B? I guess nobody remembers his last 2 years in New England. Or the fact that his SON not Billy B runs the Defense, and NE's defense was horrible those last 2 years . i guess nobody considered the fact that almost every tough team UNC faced LY they got scrubbed clean. but then everyone brings up the DUKE game, omg its a rivalry game. last 2 games in Dublin , 3 pt games, yes, but did you look at the matchups? very familiar competitive teams. Nobody talks about the blowout from 3 years ago Navy vs ND, mismatched, and i think Notre Dame blew them out 3 times in Ireland. bottom line : look at the matchups. i just think its funny that ppl on covers keep lookin a gift horse in the mouth. And all the guys actually posting their "look at me" im taking UNC, jokers lol im 100 on TCU, im not as old as all you guys here, but i know this these two, teams and the coaches as well
1
Posted:
#43
Well 2-2 for week 0 ....made i didnt think about betting 1st half in the unlv and unc games. Things will get better....once teams have played and I got something to really work with. Loving my Yankees and Mets today...lol. but maybe some also got on E.MICH they barely covered but did. I didnt post as a play because it wasn't mine but just passed along what I was told....
Stay on the path. Gl
151
0
Posted:
#45
week 1
really looking into this San Jose st @ EMU game , 1st off San Jose st only getting 3 to 3-5 ?? EMU on back to back home games , and San Jose st on back to back road games, i mean Sac st finally woke up late and put some pts on the board, they only had 1 penalty last game which is pretty good for being on the road at USC, not sure if USC pulled starters or not at start of 4th , 28-0 and San Jose st had to settle for 3 to make it 28-3 and they were at the 8 yd line i think also they went for it from the 7 earlier in the 2nd when they were down 21-0 they score there and then get a td and not 3 later its 28-14 late in 3rd who knows just stuff ya see when you are looking through the game , but they did score 23 in the 4th and had some chances just think San Jose st might be worth a look here at EMU on the road maybe riding the momentum they had from late in the game, ....hell just thinking out loud...lol
And Toledo on the road at Michigan st Toledo is always a decent team, and they start the season every year on the road vs a BIG Conf team and play well usually, .... lost by 8 last year at KY as a 10 pt dog......went on the road year before to play at Miss St after 2 home games and beat Miss st 41-17 as a 10.5 pt dog.......year before opened at Illinois and lost 30-28 in a game they could have won as a 7.5 pt dog i think it shows a pattern somewhat, always a TD + dog to a 10.5 pt dog and here this week they opened at 10.5 and has dropped as it maybe should to 9.5 have to really look into this one.......its hard to not like Toledo maybe....... glad its just Monday lol
gl all 151
151
0
Posted:
#46
@CabernetTrey
which means i didnt just mentioning it was worth a look if i make a bet ill say its been bet 28-0 at the time i was just happy san jose scored some points i was shocked they scored that many in 4th but glad i am liking San Jose this week not bet yet but looking at them
151
0
Posted:
#47
NOPE i did fuck that up mentioning over 40.5 i should have posten is USC -40.5 live worth it i do remember exactly what happened then though , and why it did not get played it was -40.5 when they were up 21-0 and i can remember they scored with not but 20 seconds left or something and it went up higher it was no longer 40.5 , it was 28-0 they were a bigger favorite but yes i did phrase that or say that wrong i am corrected but if you went to play that 30 seconds after i posted it???? it was halftime USC up 28-0 the line was not longer -40.5 and i mean like right after i posted that they scored so no one i do not think could have gotten that line and i am sure would not have played it at what ever it was but am sorry for phrasing it like i did but i know you did not play it ...but thank you for pointing it out
151
0
Posted:
#48
I had usc -20.5 in one large parlay…. Almost marked it a winner… odds had to be 91-09 that San Jose covered 20.5 at halftime …I lost again. Only loser in a fun bet … but it was paying 5or 6 to 1. Like 150 for 589 ish. My luck is still the same… drop in on occasion these days… yours is one I peek at… get em rum. ??
0
BoL this season. 
Posted:
#50
I am also really looking into Tarelton st....this is a very good FCS school...ranked in top 5 I think...they are on the road at Bowling green ...still have to look into BG but I like this Tarelton team so fat....their QB transfered from wyoming ..got a decent RB very good WR'S.....LINE is only +3 to +2.5. ...they could win this game ......more to be looked into. Just passing this along guys and gals
151
0
Hot Forum Topics
