This is the most ignorant thread ive ever seen. Boise should have lost to VT, if it wasnt for poor coaching they would have. And VT sucks.
Boise would not beat Ohio St or Alabama.
FYI Kellen Moore is shit, dudes like 5 foot 7 and has a weak ass arm, just floating balls everywhere, if they ever played a team worth a damn .......
This is the most ignorant thread ive ever seen. Boise should have lost to VT, if it wasnt for poor coaching they would have. And VT sucks.
Boise would not beat Ohio St or Alabama.
FYI Kellen Moore is shit, dudes like 5 foot 7 and has a weak ass arm, just floating balls everywhere, if they ever played a team worth a damn .......
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
So are you saying if there are 3 unbeaten teams left and boise is one of them, they should go, because thats just silly
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
So are you saying if there are 3 unbeaten teams left and boise is one of them, they should go, because thats just silly
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
Last ime Bosie was suppose to be a title contender and they play an SEC team, they lost by 5 TDs. When another WAC team, Hawaii, was suppose to ba a title contender and they played an SEC team, they lost by 5 TDs. I think the SEC is just bored and has lost interest.
![]()
Last ime Bosie was suppose to be a title contender and they play an SEC team, they lost by 5 TDs. When another WAC team, Hawaii, was suppose to ba a title contender and they played an SEC team, they lost by 5 TDs. I think the SEC is just bored and has lost interest.
![]()
If by some miracle boise gets to play ohio st...ill put money on it with u in favor of OSU. Paypal.
If by some miracle boise gets to play ohio st...ill put money on it with u in favor of OSU. Paypal.
![]()
![]()
deal ern,,but I still don't think it will be Ohio St getting there,not sure who yet though.
Ima add u as a friend. But im curious who do u think is gonna be OSU. Wisconsin, doubtful, Penn St hell no, Iowa has the best chance, but no. MSU nah, Michigan, there defense is so bad thats to easy.
There building Wisconsin up to be the toughest test for OSU all year and that to me is a joke.
deal ern,,but I still don't think it will be Ohio St getting there,not sure who yet though.
Ima add u as a friend. But im curious who do u think is gonna be OSU. Wisconsin, doubtful, Penn St hell no, Iowa has the best chance, but no. MSU nah, Michigan, there defense is so bad thats to easy.
There building Wisconsin up to be the toughest test for OSU all year and that to me is a joke.
ern,,,not sure,their toughest tests will be Sat @ Wis and Nov 20 at Iowa. They don't play Mich St this year. I agree no way with Penn St though,as they are down big time this year.I have just seen them stumble somewwhere every year in the big ten in some game they probably should not have lost to.
09 -- as 13 pt fav lose @Pur 26-18
08 ---lose to #3 Penn St 13-6
07 --lose to Ill 28-21 as 15 pt Fav and ranked #1
06 --didnt lose until NC game
05 -- lose to #16 Penn St 17-10
so,it just seems that Ohio St stumbles somewhere along the way,and this year with so many unbeatens left right now,if they stumble they will fall a long ways(ex Bama).I just think they will lose at least 1 game,and that will be crucial this year.
ern,,,not sure,their toughest tests will be Sat @ Wis and Nov 20 at Iowa. They don't play Mich St this year. I agree no way with Penn St though,as they are down big time this year.I have just seen them stumble somewwhere every year in the big ten in some game they probably should not have lost to.
09 -- as 13 pt fav lose @Pur 26-18
08 ---lose to #3 Penn St 13-6
07 --lose to Ill 28-21 as 15 pt Fav and ranked #1
06 --didnt lose until NC game
05 -- lose to #16 Penn St 17-10
so,it just seems that Ohio St stumbles somewhere along the way,and this year with so many unbeatens left right now,if they stumble they will fall a long ways(ex Bama).I just think they will lose at least 1 game,and that will be crucial this year.
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
all most of the boise backers with the exceptions of a few are saying is,if they go unbeaten,they deserve a shot,and we want them to get a shot. Everybody on the other side is just saying boise cant beat this team or that team,and they could win or be competative in a natl champ game. Well,,I posted earlier ,whats the diff ,if they deserve to be there and get beat bad,then its no different than most natl champ games. Do we want to see Ohio State get beat down by another sec team again.
If Boise goes undefeated,,give them a shot,,line up the so-called big boys and let them decide on the field. If all the big boys were so confident,they would be saying,,yes give Boise a shot,so they could destroy them,but.......thats not what they are saying,they are saying Boise don't belong there,,why...They dont want to play them. Now if Boise loses,,you get no argument from me,that they shouldnt be there,but as long as they keep winning,they deserve a shot.
Once again your reading comprehension fails you. My post does not say that Boise would not be competitive against 10-15 teams in the country. It says that 10-15 teams in the country would beat Boise, and out of those 10-15 games MOST would not be comptetive . . . NOT ALL as you want to read into it..
I've already explained in great detail why that is. It just takes a little reading, and a little reading comprehension . . . there is that reading comprehension thingy again. It is because they do not have the talent to consistently compete against top tier teams because of the large disparity in talent and depth.
I've explained that the average recruiting ranking of Boise's last 5 recruiting classes is 82. That's 82 out of 120 teams. Does that mean Boise is the 82nd best team in the nation? No, of course not. Does that mean Boise is not good? No, of course not. Does that mean Boise doesn't have very talented players on their roster? No, of course it doesn't. What it does mean is exactly what I said.
If they had to play in the SEC week in and week out, their anorexically thin roster would not hold up over the course of a season. That's why they would have a losing conference record in the SEC (which means they would be no better than 3 & 5). And 5 loss teams don't play for national championships. To play for national championships you have to do more than beat two mediocre teams and have 10 bye weeks.
![]()
Again your skiping the question and for some odd reason avioding the debate here. How are their 10-15 teams that can beat Bosie. Boise basically beat Vtech at home. With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country?
Boise beat Vtech this year. There are not even 10-15 teams better then Vtech so again I ask for the 20th time. How are their 10-15 teams better then Bosie in the country? Stop avioding the question and don't let me walk all over you like this. ![]()
Once again your reading comprehension fails you. My post does not say that Boise would not be competitive against 10-15 teams in the country. It says that 10-15 teams in the country would beat Boise, and out of those 10-15 games MOST would not be comptetive . . . NOT ALL as you want to read into it..
I've already explained in great detail why that is. It just takes a little reading, and a little reading comprehension . . . there is that reading comprehension thingy again. It is because they do not have the talent to consistently compete against top tier teams because of the large disparity in talent and depth.
I've explained that the average recruiting ranking of Boise's last 5 recruiting classes is 82. That's 82 out of 120 teams. Does that mean Boise is the 82nd best team in the nation? No, of course not. Does that mean Boise is not good? No, of course not. Does that mean Boise doesn't have very talented players on their roster? No, of course it doesn't. What it does mean is exactly what I said.
If they had to play in the SEC week in and week out, their anorexically thin roster would not hold up over the course of a season. That's why they would have a losing conference record in the SEC (which means they would be no better than 3 & 5). And 5 loss teams don't play for national championships. To play for national championships you have to do more than beat two mediocre teams and have 10 bye weeks.
![]()
Again your skiping the question and for some odd reason avioding the debate here. How are their 10-15 teams that can beat Bosie. Boise basically beat Vtech at home. With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country? With that being said, there are 10-15 teams much better then Vtech in the country?
Boise beat Vtech this year. There are not even 10-15 teams better then Vtech so again I ask for the 20th time. How are their 10-15 teams better then Bosie in the country? Stop avioding the question and don't let me walk all over you like this. ![]()
Why in this crazy world do you keep talking about the SEC schedule. We don't know what their record would be. Who gives a fuck anyway?
That has nothing to my question. How are their 10-15 teams that you can say are better then Boise? What are the teams anyway?
Why in this crazy world do you keep talking about the SEC schedule. We don't know what their record would be. Who gives a fuck anyway?
That has nothing to my question. How are their 10-15 teams that you can say are better then Boise? What are the teams anyway?

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.