i would say it's pretty clear that great intelligence is not a pre-requisite for operating a computer, or making posts in a forum...
There is a difference between great intelligence and the basic understanding that one person saying something is not proof that many others said it as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
i would say it's pretty clear that great intelligence is not a pre-requisite for operating a computer, or making posts in a forum...
There is a difference between great intelligence and the basic understanding that one person saying something is not proof that many others said it as well.
Who cares ? Anybody who thought BSU was going to get blown out by subpar SEC team, is an ignorant fool or homer.
I agree. Anyone who thought Georgia was going to blowout Boise clearly didn’t know what they were talking about.
However, ice claimed that ALL SEC fans were “calling for an easy win by Georgia.”When I asked him what proof he had of this he got pissed off and claimed he had proof he just didn’t feel like providing it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zander47:
Who cares ? Anybody who thought BSU was going to get blown out by subpar SEC team, is an ignorant fool or homer.
I agree. Anyone who thought Georgia was going to blowout Boise clearly didn’t know what they were talking about.
However, ice claimed that ALL SEC fans were “calling for an easy win by Georgia.”When I asked him what proof he had of this he got pissed off and claimed he had proof he just didn’t feel like providing it.
I agree. Anyone who thought Georgia was going to blowout Boise clearly didn’t know what they were talking about.
However, ice claimed that ALL SEC fans were “calling for an easy win by Georgia.”When I asked him what proof he had of this he got pissed off and claimed he had proof he just didn’t feel like providing it.
No disrespect but that's pretty weak because theoretically, even if ONE SEC fan doesn't feel that way, you cannot use the word "ALL", i guess.
Personally, I believe the truth lies in between, but it's definitely more on his side than yours. We are all wrong at times but the problem is you act like you never saw those comments before. Seriously, they were all over the forum before the game. So unless you were away from the forum last week or two, I am shocked you didn't many of them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
I agree. Anyone who thought Georgia was going to blowout Boise clearly didn’t know what they were talking about.
However, ice claimed that ALL SEC fans were “calling for an easy win by Georgia.”When I asked him what proof he had of this he got pissed off and claimed he had proof he just didn’t feel like providing it.
No disrespect but that's pretty weak because theoretically, even if ONE SEC fan doesn't feel that way, you cannot use the word "ALL", i guess.
Personally, I believe the truth lies in between, but it's definitely more on his side than yours. We are all wrong at times but the problem is you act like you never saw those comments before. Seriously, they were all over the forum before the game. So unless you were away from the forum last week or two, I am shocked you didn't many of them.
There is a difference between great intelligence and the basic understanding that one person saying something is not proof that many others said it as well.
many others did say it as well... i'm certain you are aware of that, and are just being a douchebag for the sake of being a douchebag... but your insistence that i need to prove it to you carries no weight with me...
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
There is a difference between great intelligence and the basic understanding that one person saying something is not proof that many others said it as well.
many others did say it as well... i'm certain you are aware of that, and are just being a douchebag for the sake of being a douchebag... but your insistence that i need to prove it to you carries no weight with me...
I agree. Anyone who thought Georgia was going to blowout Boise clearly didn’t know what they were talking about.
However, ice claimed that ALL SEC fans were “calling for an easy win by Georgia.”When I asked him what proof he had of this he got pissed off and claimed he had proof he just didn’t feel like providing it.
so you are claiming that this entire debate is centered on the fact that you don't understand that when someone says "All of you SEC fans were calling for a blowout" that the word ALL isn't meant to literally encompass every single SEC fan on the planet, or even every single SEC fan in these forums?
that is pretty fucking retarded... besides, i gave you 4 names, who are among the biggest SEC touters on this forum...
if you tell me English isn't your first language i guess i could understand, but otherwise, you have just labeled yourself a literalist and a moron!
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
I agree. Anyone who thought Georgia was going to blowout Boise clearly didn’t know what they were talking about.
However, ice claimed that ALL SEC fans were “calling for an easy win by Georgia.”When I asked him what proof he had of this he got pissed off and claimed he had proof he just didn’t feel like providing it.
so you are claiming that this entire debate is centered on the fact that you don't understand that when someone says "All of you SEC fans were calling for a blowout" that the word ALL isn't meant to literally encompass every single SEC fan on the planet, or even every single SEC fan in these forums?
that is pretty fucking retarded... besides, i gave you 4 names, who are among the biggest SEC touters on this forum...
if you tell me English isn't your first language i guess i could understand, but otherwise, you have just labeled yourself a literalist and a moron!
No disrespect but that's pretty weak because theoretically, even if ONE SEC fan doesn't feel that way, you cannot use the word "ALL", i guess.
Personally, I believe the truth lies in between, but it's definitely more on his side than yours. We are all wrong at times but the problem is you act like you never saw those comments before. Seriously, they were all over the forum before the game. So unless you were away from the forum last week or two, I am shocked you didn't many of them.
Obviously “all” was an exaggeration. I simply asked for just a few names and he became hostile. It took off from there.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:
No disrespect but that's pretty weak because theoretically, even if ONE SEC fan doesn't feel that way, you cannot use the word "ALL", i guess.
Personally, I believe the truth lies in between, but it's definitely more on his side than yours. We are all wrong at times but the problem is you act like you never saw those comments before. Seriously, they were all over the forum before the game. So unless you were away from the forum last week or two, I am shocked you didn't many of them.
Obviously “all” was an exaggeration. I simply asked for just a few names and he became hostile. It took off from there.
so you are claiming that this entire debate is centered on the fact that you don't understand that when someone says "All of you SEC fans were calling for a blowout" that the word ALL isn't meant to literally encompass every single SEC fan on the planet, or even every single SEC fan in these forums?
that is pretty fucking retarded... besides, i gave you 4 names, who are among the biggest SEC touters on this forum...
if you tell me English isn't your first language i guess i could understand, but otherwise, you have just labeled yourself a literalist and a moron!
Like I said: “all” was obviously an exaggeration.However, you should be able to provide at least a few names of people who said it.
One person who said it and then three people who who bet on Georgia doesn’t cut it.
For your sake I hope this is simply a case of you not being man enough to admit when you are wrong so you're playing dumb. Because if it’s not and you truly believe what you are saying…wow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
so you are claiming that this entire debate is centered on the fact that you don't understand that when someone says "All of you SEC fans were calling for a blowout" that the word ALL isn't meant to literally encompass every single SEC fan on the planet, or even every single SEC fan in these forums?
that is pretty fucking retarded... besides, i gave you 4 names, who are among the biggest SEC touters on this forum...
if you tell me English isn't your first language i guess i could understand, but otherwise, you have just labeled yourself a literalist and a moron!
Like I said: “all” was obviously an exaggeration.However, you should be able to provide at least a few names of people who said it.
One person who said it and then three people who who bet on Georgia doesn’t cut it.
For your sake I hope this is simply a case of you not being man enough to admit when you are wrong so you're playing dumb. Because if it’s not and you truly believe what you are saying…wow.
i am not going to do work you can easily do for yourself but are too lazy to do it... i read the forums just like you do... obviously those aren't exact quotes, because they obviously did not all say the same thing...
Jimmydafreak (for one) called UGA over Boise the best bet of the week... and i assure you, he has not subsequently given Boise their due... Tideman (or maybe it was Tiasman) said betting every single SEC team would win you money, and it would possibly be a clean sweep... JW also thought UGA would win and cover...
why don't you find me a link where any one of those 4 (or yourself for that matter) has come out and said they were wrong about Boise, and that Boise is a legit top 5 team in CFB...
but don't come in here and ask me to do your work for you, and act like because i refuse to do your work for you, that i am wrong about my claims... all you are proving there is that you are lazy!
Ifigured I would come in and get my lumps for predicting that Georgia would beat Boise... My one concern in my bet, which I stated in many threads was that Boise had a huge coaching advantage, but that I was going to assume that with Richt under so much pressure, would have this team ready to play. I was absolutely wrong. I am also the one who said that betting across the board on the SEC last week would make you money, and possibly be a clean sweep. I don't remember the exact numbers, so correct me if I am wrong....but I believe 8 of the 12 covered, with kentucky failing to cover by around 6 points, and South Carolina falling short of around 3....leaving only 2 teams failing miserably which was Georgia and Auburn. Alot of people assume that placing wagers on alot of SEC teams, that you are an SEC homer, but it just so happens that thats the teams that I follow the most, and know the best.... Not saying that you are one of them Ice.... because you know I respect your football knowledge, but there are many more SEC haters, than SEC homers.... plain and simple, and it will remain this way until someone other than an SEC team can step up and win it all....I give Boise alot of credit for beating Georgia... but you have to agree that Georgia is nowhere near an elite team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
i am not going to do work you can easily do for yourself but are too lazy to do it... i read the forums just like you do... obviously those aren't exact quotes, because they obviously did not all say the same thing...
Jimmydafreak (for one) called UGA over Boise the best bet of the week... and i assure you, he has not subsequently given Boise their due... Tideman (or maybe it was Tiasman) said betting every single SEC team would win you money, and it would possibly be a clean sweep... JW also thought UGA would win and cover...
why don't you find me a link where any one of those 4 (or yourself for that matter) has come out and said they were wrong about Boise, and that Boise is a legit top 5 team in CFB...
but don't come in here and ask me to do your work for you, and act like because i refuse to do your work for you, that i am wrong about my claims... all you are proving there is that you are lazy!
Ifigured I would come in and get my lumps for predicting that Georgia would beat Boise... My one concern in my bet, which I stated in many threads was that Boise had a huge coaching advantage, but that I was going to assume that with Richt under so much pressure, would have this team ready to play. I was absolutely wrong. I am also the one who said that betting across the board on the SEC last week would make you money, and possibly be a clean sweep. I don't remember the exact numbers, so correct me if I am wrong....but I believe 8 of the 12 covered, with kentucky failing to cover by around 6 points, and South Carolina falling short of around 3....leaving only 2 teams failing miserably which was Georgia and Auburn. Alot of people assume that placing wagers on alot of SEC teams, that you are an SEC homer, but it just so happens that thats the teams that I follow the most, and know the best.... Not saying that you are one of them Ice.... because you know I respect your football knowledge, but there are many more SEC haters, than SEC homers.... plain and simple, and it will remain this way until someone other than an SEC team can step up and win it all....I give Boise alot of credit for beating Georgia... but you have to agree that Georgia is nowhere near an elite team.
Ifigured I would come in and get my lumps for predicting that Georgia would beat Boise... My one concern in my bet, which I stated in many threads was that Boise had a huge coaching advantage, but that I was going to assume that with Richt under so much pressure, would have this team ready to play. I was absolutely wrong. I am also the one who said that betting across the board on the SEC last week would make you money, and possibly be a clean sweep. I don't remember the exact numbers, so correct me if I am wrong....but I believe 8 of the 12 covered, with kentucky failing to cover by around 6 points, and South Carolina falling short of around 3....leaving only 2 teams failing miserably which was Georgia and Auburn. Alot of people assume that placing wagers on alot of SEC teams, that you are an SEC homer, but it just so happens that thats the teams that I follow the most, and know the best.... Not saying that you are one of them Ice.... because you know I respect your football knowledge, but there are many more SEC haters, than SEC homers.... plain and simple, and it will remain this way until someone other than an SEC team can step up and win it all....I give Boise alot of credit for beating Georgia... but you have to agree that Georgia is nowhere near an elite team.
I agree about the SEC haters.5 straight national championships has caused a lot of jealousy.
By the way, did you ever claim Georgia was going to easily win SU?
0
Quote Originally Posted by tideman:
Ifigured I would come in and get my lumps for predicting that Georgia would beat Boise... My one concern in my bet, which I stated in many threads was that Boise had a huge coaching advantage, but that I was going to assume that with Richt under so much pressure, would have this team ready to play. I was absolutely wrong. I am also the one who said that betting across the board on the SEC last week would make you money, and possibly be a clean sweep. I don't remember the exact numbers, so correct me if I am wrong....but I believe 8 of the 12 covered, with kentucky failing to cover by around 6 points, and South Carolina falling short of around 3....leaving only 2 teams failing miserably which was Georgia and Auburn. Alot of people assume that placing wagers on alot of SEC teams, that you are an SEC homer, but it just so happens that thats the teams that I follow the most, and know the best.... Not saying that you are one of them Ice.... because you know I respect your football knowledge, but there are many more SEC haters, than SEC homers.... plain and simple, and it will remain this way until someone other than an SEC team can step up and win it all....I give Boise alot of credit for beating Georgia... but you have to agree that Georgia is nowhere near an elite team.
I agree about the SEC haters.5 straight national championships has caused a lot of jealousy.
By the way, did you ever claim Georgia was going to easily win SU?
I agree about the SEC haters.5 straight national championships has caused a lot of jealousy.
By the way, did you ever claim Georgia was going to easily win SU?
No never claimed they would win easily, I actually thought it would be a close game either way, but I definitely wasn't expecting Boise to dominate Georgia like they did.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
I agree about the SEC haters.5 straight national championships has caused a lot of jealousy.
By the way, did you ever claim Georgia was going to easily win SU?
No never claimed they would win easily, I actually thought it would be a close game either way, but I definitely wasn't expecting Boise to dominate Georgia like they did.
No never claimed they would win easily, I actually thought it would be a close game either way, but I definitely wasn't expecting Boise to dominate Georgia like they did.
I only ask because when Ice said that all SEC fans were calling for an easy Georgia win I asked him who specifically said that.He replied “like I said, all of them” and then listed your name.
Of course he didn’t provide any proof for his claim and became angered when I asked for it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tideman:
No never claimed they would win easily, I actually thought it would be a close game either way, but I definitely wasn't expecting Boise to dominate Georgia like they did.
I only ask because when Ice said that all SEC fans were calling for an easy Georgia win I asked him who specifically said that.He replied “like I said, all of them” and then listed your name.
Of course he didn’t provide any proof for his claim and became angered when I asked for it.
... have I got your attention? Because i'm damn sure Boise has yours now. Boise whooped one of your SEC big boys basically IN THEIR OWN HOUSE. What do you all have to say now?
Dont forget about Auburn they barely got through the fire! Let the HatersHate! They need a job too!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skanless1:
... have I got your attention? Because i'm damn sure Boise has yours now. Boise whooped one of your SEC big boys basically IN THEIR OWN HOUSE. What do you all have to say now?
Dont forget about Auburn they barely got through the fire! Let the HatersHate! They need a job too!
Ifigured I would come in and get my lumps for predicting that Georgia would beat Boise... My one concern in my bet, which I stated in many threads was that Boise had a huge coaching advantage, but that I was going to assume that with Richt under so much pressure, would have this team ready to play. I was absolutely wrong. I am also the one who said that betting across the board on the SEC last week would make you money, and possibly be a clean sweep. I don't remember the exact numbers, so correct me if I am wrong....but I believe 8 of the 12 covered, with kentucky failing to cover by around 6 points, and South Carolina falling short of around 3....leaving only 2 teams failing miserably which was Georgia and Auburn. Alot of people assume that placing wagers on alot of SEC teams, that you are an SEC homer, but it just so happens that thats the teams that I follow the most, and know the best.... Not saying that you are one of them Ice.... because you know I respect your football knowledge, but there are many more SEC haters, than SEC homers.... plain and simple, and it will remain this way until someone other than an SEC team can step up and win it all....I give Boise alot of credit for beating Georgia... but you have to agree that Georgia is nowhere near an elite team.
agree w/all of this. my basic point of this whole thing is the that the SEC isn't as "untouchable" as many here say, and Boise does not get as much credit as they deserve, year after year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tideman:
Ifigured I would come in and get my lumps for predicting that Georgia would beat Boise... My one concern in my bet, which I stated in many threads was that Boise had a huge coaching advantage, but that I was going to assume that with Richt under so much pressure, would have this team ready to play. I was absolutely wrong. I am also the one who said that betting across the board on the SEC last week would make you money, and possibly be a clean sweep. I don't remember the exact numbers, so correct me if I am wrong....but I believe 8 of the 12 covered, with kentucky failing to cover by around 6 points, and South Carolina falling short of around 3....leaving only 2 teams failing miserably which was Georgia and Auburn. Alot of people assume that placing wagers on alot of SEC teams, that you are an SEC homer, but it just so happens that thats the teams that I follow the most, and know the best.... Not saying that you are one of them Ice.... because you know I respect your football knowledge, but there are many more SEC haters, than SEC homers.... plain and simple, and it will remain this way until someone other than an SEC team can step up and win it all....I give Boise alot of credit for beating Georgia... but you have to agree that Georgia is nowhere near an elite team.
agree w/all of this. my basic point of this whole thing is the that the SEC isn't as "untouchable" as many here say, and Boise does not get as much credit as they deserve, year after year.
Sure they do.Boise gets credit for beating the 8th best SEC team by two scores at a neutral site.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.
They don’t get credit for handing out “a beat down” on an "SEC big boy."
How the fuck is the Georgia Dome when the game is Georgia vs Boise State a "neutral site"!?!?!?!? God 20k posts to come up with this drivel???? The Georgia Dome is neutral for Georgia vs Boise??!?!?!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
Sure they do.Boise gets credit for beating the 8th best SEC team by two scores at a neutral site.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.
They don’t get credit for handing out “a beat down” on an "SEC big boy."
How the fuck is the Georgia Dome when the game is Georgia vs Boise State a "neutral site"!?!?!?!? God 20k posts to come up with this drivel???? The Georgia Dome is neutral for Georgia vs Boise??!?!?!!
many others did say it as well... i'm certain you are aware of that, and are just being a douchebag for the sake of being a douchebag... but your insistence that i need to prove it to you carries no weight with me...
Only takes a very brief cursory glance at this moron's posts to see that he has no idea what he is talking about. And OBVIOUSLY lost money by betting on Georgia
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
many others did say it as well... i'm certain you are aware of that, and are just being a douchebag for the sake of being a douchebag... but your insistence that i need to prove it to you carries no weight with me...
Only takes a very brief cursory glance at this moron's posts to see that he has no idea what he is talking about. And OBVIOUSLY lost money by betting on Georgia
How the fuck is the Georgia Dome when the game is Georgia vs Boise State a "neutral site"!?!?!?!? God 20k posts to come up with this drivel???? The Georgia Dome is neutral for Georgia vs Boise??!?!?!!
lol, i just saw this shit... homeboy really claimed the georgia dome was a "neutral site"... c'mon son, you're losing ALL credibility w/that nonsense.
UN-f'ing real!
0
Quote Originally Posted by EddieGordo:
How the fuck is the Georgia Dome when the game is Georgia vs Boise State a "neutral site"!?!?!?!? God 20k posts to come up with this drivel???? The Georgia Dome is neutral for Georgia vs Boise??!?!?!!
lol, i just saw this shit... homeboy really claimed the georgia dome was a "neutral site"... c'mon son, you're losing ALL credibility w/that nonsense.
lol, i just saw this shit... homeboy really claimed the georgia dome was a "neutral site"... c'mon son, you're losing ALL credibility w/that nonsense.
UN-f'ing real!
The sad thing is that moron has been on this site long enough to post 20k plus posts.......and yet that is the stupidity that he comes up with. FUcking sad that after spending 5 years of your life posting all day on an internet forum that you still know that little about sports right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skanless1:
lol, i just saw this shit... homeboy really claimed the georgia dome was a "neutral site"... c'mon son, you're losing ALL credibility w/that nonsense.
UN-f'ing real!
The sad thing is that moron has been on this site long enough to post 20k plus posts.......and yet that is the stupidity that he comes up with. FUcking sad that after spending 5 years of your life posting all day on an internet forum that you still know that little about sports right?
I said multiple times that I still didn't think UGA was any good and that I didn't trust them but I did think they would finally show up to a game and look like a functioning program for once with all the pressure and time to prepare, silly me. They were awful and you could tell much of it was do to be undisciplined and POORLY coached defensively. Those guys looked like they never went through two a days or went live in practice more than a day.
0
I said multiple times that I still didn't think UGA was any good and that I didn't trust them but I did think they would finally show up to a game and look like a functioning program for once with all the pressure and time to prepare, silly me. They were awful and you could tell much of it was do to be undisciplined and POORLY coached defensively. Those guys looked like they never went through two a days or went live in practice more than a day.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Dont forget about Auburn they barely got through the fire! Let the Haters Hate! They need a job too!
Hot Forum Topics
