YALE vs. PRINCETON: An angle so rare that is can only happen ONCE and you will never see it again!!!
Ok folks.
Which is more impressive:
Beating a team which is perennially in the tournament, that is a more than well-seasoned tournament team (had one of the great runs with Kemba Walker), different players and some different coaches yes, but the spirit and legacy of their tournament play and experience (which carries over for some players) is not lost on these players, +
UConn is playing a default home game because they put the tourney in Connecticut (I wonder why? Maybe because the divisions best tournament team in terms of history would have a better shot?) +
In a game UConn didn't lead for a single SECOND +
UConn just showed the power of the conference throwing it a bone by knocking off a flawed but better Houston team the game before (handily);
And compare this to BWS's more impressive win, per his opinion:
They beat UCF, a top defensive team in the country. And that's about t.
I wonder which is better?
I don't normally quote AAC stats like 'best defense' in the country because you are beating up TOTAL CRAP in Tulane and East Carolina and South Florida (2 of the worst 3 teams in the nation from a recognizable conference and USF may be the worst at this point) and Temple who fell off drastically, and Tulsa, another pushover on many nights.
That is why I focused on the out of conference schedule in the OP while BWS hoots and hollers about the in-conference 'best defense', and UCF feasted off these bottom-feeders.
UCF was JUST HAPPY TO BE THERE, having gotten knocked off by Tulane last year in an woefully embarrassing first round loss.
Now who had the more impressive win yesterday?
You can toot the SMU horn as I know you will continue to but I'll let others decide for themselves.
Thanks to all the above. ![]()
Ok folks.
Which is more impressive:
Beating a team which is perennially in the tournament, that is a more than well-seasoned tournament team (had one of the great runs with Kemba Walker), different players and some different coaches yes, but the spirit and legacy of their tournament play and experience (which carries over for some players) is not lost on these players, +
UConn is playing a default home game because they put the tourney in Connecticut (I wonder why? Maybe because the divisions best tournament team in terms of history would have a better shot?) +
In a game UConn didn't lead for a single SECOND +
UConn just showed the power of the conference throwing it a bone by knocking off a flawed but better Houston team the game before (handily);
And compare this to BWS's more impressive win, per his opinion:
They beat UCF, a top defensive team in the country. And that's about t.
I wonder which is better?
I don't normally quote AAC stats like 'best defense' in the country because you are beating up TOTAL CRAP in Tulane and East Carolina and South Florida (2 of the worst 3 teams in the nation from a recognizable conference and USF may be the worst at this point) and Temple who fell off drastically, and Tulsa, another pushover on many nights.
That is why I focused on the out of conference schedule in the OP while BWS hoots and hollers about the in-conference 'best defense', and UCF feasted off these bottom-feeders.
UCF was JUST HAPPY TO BE THERE, having gotten knocked off by Tulane last year in an woefully embarrassing first round loss.
Now who had the more impressive win yesterday?
You can toot the SMU horn as I know you will continue to but I'll let others decide for themselves.
Thanks to all the above. ![]()
That is a legitimate take. I did consider that.
That is a legitimate take. I did consider that.
2017 Record: 6-10
Bad record but 3 in a row hit so far and my goal is to somehow win another 4 in a row. Let's try it together.
This game is at the Palisades in Pennsylvania and will be played at 12pm EST.
What is the angle? It is this:
1. "The Ivy League has NEVER had a conference tournament before this year, therefore, players and coaches are unprepared for it."
Coaches are unprepared for it? Amaker and Donahue have coached in these events at their prior schools. And those were the two who got knocked out yesterday.
Nice try though.
2017 Record: 6-10
Bad record but 3 in a row hit so far and my goal is to somehow win another 4 in a row. Let's try it together.
This game is at the Palisades in Pennsylvania and will be played at 12pm EST.
What is the angle? It is this:
1. "The Ivy League has NEVER had a conference tournament before this year, therefore, players and coaches are unprepared for it."
Coaches are unprepared for it? Amaker and Donahue have coached in these events at their prior schools. And those were the two who got knocked out yesterday.
Nice try though.
2017 Record: 6-10
Bad record but 3 in a row hit so far and my goal is to somehow win another 4 in a row. Let's try it together.
This game is at the Palisades in Pennsylvania and will be played at 12pm EST.
What is the angle? It is this:
1. "The Ivy League has NEVER had a conference tournament before this year, therefore, players and coaches are unprepared for it."
Coaches are unprepared for it? Amaker and Donahue have coached in these events at their prior schools. And those were the two who got knocked out yesterday.
Nice try though.
Nice try? Having ANY experience at prior and having annual experience are two different things all in a conference that has never had a conference tournament. Tough to turn it around after all those years and get these kids motivated for a win ASAP. There are many other angles in the OP as I've said a billion times.
Addicted - We don't have to win. All that you said doesn't necessarily justify the spread of 7. That is the crux of this. I'm looking for a close game. That's about it and 7 is a nice number to have. I'd like 10-11 but I can't get it so I'll take the 7.![]()
2017 Record: 6-10
Bad record but 3 in a row hit so far and my goal is to somehow win another 4 in a row. Let's try it together.
This game is at the Palisades in Pennsylvania and will be played at 12pm EST.
What is the angle? It is this:
1. "The Ivy League has NEVER had a conference tournament before this year, therefore, players and coaches are unprepared for it."
Coaches are unprepared for it? Amaker and Donahue have coached in these events at their prior schools. And those were the two who got knocked out yesterday.
Nice try though.
Nice try? Having ANY experience at prior and having annual experience are two different things all in a conference that has never had a conference tournament. Tough to turn it around after all those years and get these kids motivated for a win ASAP. There are many other angles in the OP as I've said a billion times.
Addicted - We don't have to win. All that you said doesn't necessarily justify the spread of 7. That is the crux of this. I'm looking for a close game. That's about it and 7 is a nice number to have. I'd like 10-11 but I can't get it so I'll take the 7.![]()
Ok folks.
Which is more impressive:
Beating a team which is perennially in the tournament, that is a more than well-seasoned tournament team (had one of the great runs with Kemba Walker), different players and some different coaches yes, but the spirit and legacy of their tournament play and experience (which carries over for some players) is not lost on these players, +
UConn is playing a default home game because they put the tourney in Connecticut (I wonder why? Maybe because the divisions best tournament team in terms of history would have a better shot?) +
In a game UConn didn't lead for a single SECOND +
UConn just showed the power of the conference throwing it a bone by knocking off a flawed but better Houston team the game before (handily);
And compare this to BWS's more impressive win, per his opinion:
They beat UCF, a top defensive team in the country. And that's about t.
I wonder which is better?
I don't normally quote AAC stats like 'best defense' in the country because you are beating up TOTAL CRAP in Tulane and East Carolina and South Florida (2 of the worst 3 teams in the nation from a recognizable conference and USF may be the worst at this point) and Temple who fell off drastically, and Tulsa, another pushover on many nights.
That is why I focused on the out of conference schedule in the OP while BWS hoots and hollers about the in-conference 'best defense', and UCF feasted off these bottom-feeders.
UCF was JUST HAPPY TO BE THERE, having gotten knocked off by Tulane last year in an woefully embarrassing first round loss.
Now who had the more impressive win yesterday?
You can toot the SMU horn as I know you will continue to but I'll let others decide for themselves.
Thanks to all the above. ![]()
Ok folks.
Which is more impressive:
Beating a team which is perennially in the tournament, that is a more than well-seasoned tournament team (had one of the great runs with Kemba Walker), different players and some different coaches yes, but the spirit and legacy of their tournament play and experience (which carries over for some players) is not lost on these players, +
UConn is playing a default home game because they put the tourney in Connecticut (I wonder why? Maybe because the divisions best tournament team in terms of history would have a better shot?) +
In a game UConn didn't lead for a single SECOND +
UConn just showed the power of the conference throwing it a bone by knocking off a flawed but better Houston team the game before (handily);
And compare this to BWS's more impressive win, per his opinion:
They beat UCF, a top defensive team in the country. And that's about t.
I wonder which is better?
I don't normally quote AAC stats like 'best defense' in the country because you are beating up TOTAL CRAP in Tulane and East Carolina and South Florida (2 of the worst 3 teams in the nation from a recognizable conference and USF may be the worst at this point) and Temple who fell off drastically, and Tulsa, another pushover on many nights.
That is why I focused on the out of conference schedule in the OP while BWS hoots and hollers about the in-conference 'best defense', and UCF feasted off these bottom-feeders.
UCF was JUST HAPPY TO BE THERE, having gotten knocked off by Tulane last year in an woefully embarrassing first round loss.
Now who had the more impressive win yesterday?
You can toot the SMU horn as I know you will continue to but I'll let others decide for themselves.
Thanks to all the above. ![]()
Citing RPI ....
yes, in case you don't know what it is, is still widely used to judge overall ranking of basketball teams.
When the selection committee makes an argument for or against a team's seeding and cites how many top 50 wins or top 100 wins a team has where do you think the 50 and 100 come from ?
Oh and speaking of top 50 wins SMU only has 1 while Cincinnatti has 3 with the same # of losses on the year....and that only win for MSU was to Cincy in a home game
Not only that the Sos 81 for Cincy is and 113 for SMU.
So here is some valuable info that's being cited. What value would you like to cite besides a pointing finger?
Seen you post before and never seen a god damn thing you have ever posted of any substance
Citing RPI ....
yes, in case you don't know what it is, is still widely used to judge overall ranking of basketball teams.
When the selection committee makes an argument for or against a team's seeding and cites how many top 50 wins or top 100 wins a team has where do you think the 50 and 100 come from ?
Oh and speaking of top 50 wins SMU only has 1 while Cincinnatti has 3 with the same # of losses on the year....and that only win for MSU was to Cincy in a home game
Not only that the Sos 81 for Cincy is and 113 for SMU.
So here is some valuable info that's being cited. What value would you like to cite besides a pointing finger?
Seen you post before and never seen a god damn thing you have ever posted of any substance
CRIIIIIIINGEEEEEEEE. I am cringing SOOOOOOO hard. Ughhhhhhhh
CRIIIIIIINGEEEEEEEE. I am cringing SOOOOOOO hard. Ughhhhhhhh
lets face it yale sucks
lets face it yale sucks
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,822
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
256,973
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,126
-
9/12 🔥🔥??????
3,990
-
Saturday 09/12/2026
808
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,639
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
96,471
-
Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System?
27,879
-
Buckeyes/Longhorns in game
1,019
-
Public Indicator Calculations 2026
11,384
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search

Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.