LOVE IT! You are to be congratulated, not many people at all can last - your one disciplined son of a gun
Keep it up, stay motivated, and tell as many people as you can about it so that they can keep you accountable when you want to stop!
Well i've got a group of 15 girls/ladies that are doing the Insanity with me. They fail a lot(most are 24-30yrs old) but we have 4 that are over 40. It's amazing that they are hanging with this. I have to be held accountable because i'm the one with all the dvds lol. We put it on the smart board and do it!
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
LOVE IT! You are to be congratulated, not many people at all can last - your one disciplined son of a gun
Keep it up, stay motivated, and tell as many people as you can about it so that they can keep you accountable when you want to stop!
Well i've got a group of 15 girls/ladies that are doing the Insanity with me. They fail a lot(most are 24-30yrs old) but we have 4 that are over 40. It's amazing that they are hanging with this. I have to be held accountable because i'm the one with all the dvds lol. We put it on the smart board and do it!
Kine look at the Over in Nevada/NMST. I've got that at 170.
That's so funny you mentioned that game, it jumped right out at me during my initial research. I am embarrassed to say that I have watched a bunch of NMSU games this season and they are game to run and gun with anyone - I always fear numbers over 160 because any cold shooting spell really hurts and both teams will have to pull their weight.
I certainly agree that it should go over - but I wouldn't be shocked to see a 77-74 type of score either. I think the side might be the way to go. Nevada hasn't shot the ball well lately and believe it or not, 8 or their last 9 games have had fewer than their season average of 69.4 possessions, I believe they have had a shift of offensive mindset and whether its the depth issue or their main guns wearing down, they have certainly slowed down. Interesting game to say the least.
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasMaxx:
Kine look at the Over in Nevada/NMST. I've got that at 170.
That's so funny you mentioned that game, it jumped right out at me during my initial research. I am embarrassed to say that I have watched a bunch of NMSU games this season and they are game to run and gun with anyone - I always fear numbers over 160 because any cold shooting spell really hurts and both teams will have to pull their weight.
I certainly agree that it should go over - but I wouldn't be shocked to see a 77-74 type of score either. I think the side might be the way to go. Nevada hasn't shot the ball well lately and believe it or not, 8 or their last 9 games have had fewer than their season average of 69.4 possessions, I believe they have had a shift of offensive mindset and whether its the depth issue or their main guns wearing down, they have certainly slowed down. Interesting game to say the least.
That's so funny you mentioned that game, it jumped right out at me during my initial research. I am embarrassed to say that I have watched a bunch of NMSU games this season and they are game to run and gun with anyone - I always fear numbers over 160 because any cold shooting spell really hurts and both teams will have to pull their weight.
I certainly agree that it should go over - but I wouldn't be shocked to see a 77-74 type of score either. I think the side might be the way to go. Nevada hasn't shot the ball well lately and believe it or not, 8 or their last 9 games have had fewer than their season average of 69.4 possessions, I believe they have had a shift of offensive mindset and whether its the depth issue or their main guns wearing down, they have certainly slowed down. Interesting game to say the least.
If I had to write my thoughts on this game, this post would have summed them up perfectly. Both teams are playing at more than 69+ possessions per game and giving up more than 1.000 pt per possession on the defensive end. But like you said, I find it very difficult to play an over that is 160+.
As for the sides, the season stats are so skewed for NMSU since they have been playing with their full squad only since the beginning of Feb. Throw their stinker out at Fresno (still don't know how that happened), and this team has been rolling. Strong lean taking the points tonight in a game I can see NMSU winning SU.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
That's so funny you mentioned that game, it jumped right out at me during my initial research. I am embarrassed to say that I have watched a bunch of NMSU games this season and they are game to run and gun with anyone - I always fear numbers over 160 because any cold shooting spell really hurts and both teams will have to pull their weight.
I certainly agree that it should go over - but I wouldn't be shocked to see a 77-74 type of score either. I think the side might be the way to go. Nevada hasn't shot the ball well lately and believe it or not, 8 or their last 9 games have had fewer than their season average of 69.4 possessions, I believe they have had a shift of offensive mindset and whether its the depth issue or their main guns wearing down, they have certainly slowed down. Interesting game to say the least.
If I had to write my thoughts on this game, this post would have summed them up perfectly. Both teams are playing at more than 69+ possessions per game and giving up more than 1.000 pt per possession on the defensive end. But like you said, I find it very difficult to play an over that is 160+.
As for the sides, the season stats are so skewed for NMSU since they have been playing with their full squad only since the beginning of Feb. Throw their stinker out at Fresno (still don't know how that happened), and this team has been rolling. Strong lean taking the points tonight in a game I can see NMSU winning SU.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
