SHIRLEY'S LINES FOR SATURDAY'S GAMES FOR ALL TO SEE
Northeastern is a 1.5 to 2.5 dog and her calculation has them at 7.60 favorite making Northeastern a strong play! It's not rocket science people!!!! She has done all the hard work so refrain from the dumb questions.
Well said......
Northeastern is a 1.5 to 2.5 dog and her calculation has them at 7.60 favorite making Northeastern a strong play! It's not rocket science people!!!! She has done all the hard work so refrain from the dumb questions.
Well said......
shirley, thanks for posted your line, I have a question for you
your line have richmond 3.90 my book have them at -10 so St louis is a play
Yes, St Louis is a dog play with a delta of 6.10
Hold your breath on this one, they're not that good, and we are trusting the computer to point us in the right direction here. It's not my favorite play of the day, but I will have $$$$$ on it. If it loses, I will not be surprised, because a closer look at both teams tell me that it could in fact be a blowout. I still go with the model over my personal opinion, but I have the LIBERTY to use my mind in my evaluations as well.
Everyone should lay off of a game if they think the model is wrong, or they have information or a 6th sense about things that are difficult to quantify. There are some really good handicappers in here, that I'm sure will NOT be wagering on Cal today, even though it is one of my computers selections. I personally have 2nd thought on that game, and will look hard at the moves, and others opinions that I respect for their take on the game.
Shirley
shirley, thanks for posted your line, I have a question for you
your line have richmond 3.90 my book have them at -10 so St louis is a play
Yes, St Louis is a dog play with a delta of 6.10
Hold your breath on this one, they're not that good, and we are trusting the computer to point us in the right direction here. It's not my favorite play of the day, but I will have $$$$$ on it. If it loses, I will not be surprised, because a closer look at both teams tell me that it could in fact be a blowout. I still go with the model over my personal opinion, but I have the LIBERTY to use my mind in my evaluations as well.
Everyone should lay off of a game if they think the model is wrong, or they have information or a 6th sense about things that are difficult to quantify. There are some really good handicappers in here, that I'm sure will NOT be wagering on Cal today, even though it is one of my computers selections. I personally have 2nd thought on that game, and will look hard at the moves, and others opinions that I respect for their take on the game.
Shirley
Northeastern is a 1.5 to 2.5 dog and her calculation has them at 7.60 favorite making Northeastern a strong play! It's not rocket science people!!!! She has done all the hard work so refrain from the dumb questions.
Agree 100%
Northeastern is a 1.5 to 2.5 dog and her calculation has them at 7.60 favorite making Northeastern a strong play! It's not rocket science people!!!! She has done all the hard work so refrain from the dumb questions.
Agree 100%
how does this system work btw great record what makes a game a play or not?
Please.....just go back and READ her older posts.....it is all explained in detail.
A little due diligence never hurt anyone.
how does this system work btw great record what makes a game a play or not?
Please.....just go back and READ her older posts.....it is all explained in detail.
A little due diligence never hurt anyone.
Yes, St Louis is a dog play with a delta of 6.10
Hold your breath on this one, they're not that good, and we are trusting the computer to point us in the right direction here. It's not my favorite play of the day, but I will have $$$$$ on it. If it loses, I will not be surprised, because a closer look at both teams tell me that it could in fact be a blowout. I still go with the model over my personal opinion, but I have the LIBERTY to use my mind in my evaluations as well.
Everyone should lay off of a game if they think the model is wrong, or they have information or a 6th sense about things that are difficult to quantify. There are some really good handicappers in here, that I'm sure will NOT be wagering on Cal today, even though it is one of my computers selections. I personally have 2nd thought on that game, and will look hard at the moves, and others opinions that I respect for their take on the game.
Shirley
Shirley....don't forget that TROY play the other night......they are weak....and won outright....
Yes, St Louis is a dog play with a delta of 6.10
Hold your breath on this one, they're not that good, and we are trusting the computer to point us in the right direction here. It's not my favorite play of the day, but I will have $$$$$ on it. If it loses, I will not be surprised, because a closer look at both teams tell me that it could in fact be a blowout. I still go with the model over my personal opinion, but I have the LIBERTY to use my mind in my evaluations as well.
Everyone should lay off of a game if they think the model is wrong, or they have information or a 6th sense about things that are difficult to quantify. There are some really good handicappers in here, that I'm sure will NOT be wagering on Cal today, even though it is one of my computers selections. I personally have 2nd thought on that game, and will look hard at the moves, and others opinions that I respect for their take on the game.
Shirley
Shirley....don't forget that TROY play the other night......they are weak....and won outright....
She has supplied the computer line....now YOU can do your own homework against the ACTUAL Vegas lines to find the plays.
If you need help understanding the system, please go back and review her older posts.
I'm not trying to be abrasive, but Shirley has essentially done the "leg work" for you.....and I'm pretty sure she doesn't want to continue to explain her system in EVERY post.
The reason I say this is due to the fact that her thread from the other day became a bit clogged up with unnecessary nonsense.
She has supplied the computer line....now YOU can do your own homework against the ACTUAL Vegas lines to find the plays.
If you need help understanding the system, please go back and review her older posts.
I'm not trying to be abrasive, but Shirley has essentially done the "leg work" for you.....and I'm pretty sure she doesn't want to continue to explain her system in EVERY post.
The reason I say this is due to the fact that her thread from the other day became a bit clogged up with unnecessary nonsense.
first post on this forum. been watching here and there but cant seem to figure out how to convert shirley's system into the lines the books have. will someone help me out and post on here how to do it with an exaple, or PM me with the info. either way it would be greatly appreciated. thanks and BOL to all today. lets make that money
Shirley lists the lines that her computer comes up with. It's our job to find where there is a big difference between her numbers and the actual line. When she says NE 7.6, that means her module says NE will win by 7.6. (She doesn't use the negative sign, she just lists the favorites according to her computer module). Meanwhile the actual line on that game is NE +1...so this is an easy play...the difference is 8.6...a difference of 4 qualifies for a play.
first post on this forum. been watching here and there but cant seem to figure out how to convert shirley's system into the lines the books have. will someone help me out and post on here how to do it with an exaple, or PM me with the info. either way it would be greatly appreciated. thanks and BOL to all today. lets make that money
Shirley lists the lines that her computer comes up with. It's our job to find where there is a big difference between her numbers and the actual line. When she says NE 7.6, that means her module says NE will win by 7.6. (She doesn't use the negative sign, she just lists the favorites according to her computer module). Meanwhile the actual line on that game is NE +1...so this is an easy play...the difference is 8.6...a difference of 4 qualifies for a play.
THAT'S -1, NOT +1
Remember favorites are not as good as dogs, historically speaking.
Out for a few hours, catch up with everyone later.
Shirley
THAT'S -1, NOT +1
Remember favorites are not as good as dogs, historically speaking.
Out for a few hours, catch up with everyone later.
Shirley
Remember favorites are not as good as dogs, historically speaking.
Out for a few hours, catch up with everyone later.
Shirley
Shirley, so UNC is a play?
Remember favorites are not as good as dogs, historically speaking.
Out for a few hours, catch up with everyone later.
Shirley
Shirley, so UNC is a play?
ok guys - based on those numbers and the current lines here is how it is:
i will list the play, then the difference
underdogs:
northeastern - 10.1
unc - 7
cuse - 4.1
st louis - 6.1
william and mary - 4.4
wisc gb - 6.3
cal - 6.0
utah - 4.7
tenn - 5.1
ok st - 5.2
tulsa - 8.0
kansas st - 6.5
fresno - 4.0
nevada - 5.6
uc riverside - 4.9
davidson - 5.4
favorites:
nm st - 4.1
miami (oh) - 5.1
long beach st - 6.0
THOSE ARE ALL THE PLAYS THAT DIFFER 4.0 OR MORE POINTS.
NOW HERE ARE ONES BETWEEN 3 AND 4. BUT ONLY UNDERDOGS, BECAUSE SHIRLEY SAYS IF U DIP DOWN TO 3, U CAN ONLY TAKE THE DOG. THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL PLAYS, JUST ONES TO CONSIDER.
underdogs:
ysu - 3.5
bc - 3.6 (play if line moves to +3)
odu - 3.7
seton hall - 3.5
northern colorado - 3.1
hope that clears alot up for everyone
ok guys - based on those numbers and the current lines here is how it is:
i will list the play, then the difference
underdogs:
northeastern - 10.1
unc - 7
cuse - 4.1
st louis - 6.1
william and mary - 4.4
wisc gb - 6.3
cal - 6.0
utah - 4.7
tenn - 5.1
ok st - 5.2
tulsa - 8.0
kansas st - 6.5
fresno - 4.0
nevada - 5.6
uc riverside - 4.9
davidson - 5.4
favorites:
nm st - 4.1
miami (oh) - 5.1
long beach st - 6.0
THOSE ARE ALL THE PLAYS THAT DIFFER 4.0 OR MORE POINTS.
NOW HERE ARE ONES BETWEEN 3 AND 4. BUT ONLY UNDERDOGS, BECAUSE SHIRLEY SAYS IF U DIP DOWN TO 3, U CAN ONLY TAKE THE DOG. THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL PLAYS, JUST ONES TO CONSIDER.
underdogs:
ysu - 3.5
bc - 3.6 (play if line moves to +3)
odu - 3.7
seton hall - 3.5
northern colorado - 3.1
hope that clears alot up for everyone
+1 at betqs
https://livefeed.betqs.com/LiveLines/LiveLinesView.aspx?lg=272
I see mostly UNC + 1.5 (Matchbook, 5-Dimes, Pinny, Bet US, Cris) some +1's. Looks like some RLM w most wagers coming in on UNC. Maybe a ploy by books to deter some big $$$ from sharps... after all it really wont make a diff if UNC wins by a handful or more.
+1 at betqs
https://livefeed.betqs.com/LiveLines/LiveLinesView.aspx?lg=272
I see mostly UNC + 1.5 (Matchbook, 5-Dimes, Pinny, Bet US, Cris) some +1's. Looks like some RLM w most wagers coming in on UNC. Maybe a ploy by books to deter some big $$$ from sharps... after all it really wont make a diff if UNC wins by a handful or more.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
259,918
-
Wednesday 09/23/2026
493
-
PART DEUX
180
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
58,375
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
15,234
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
24,042
-
Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity
26,209
-
What damage to America does the traitor and his party plan for the rest of the year.?
25,673
-
pg mlb 2026 season thread
6,779
-
Looks like project 2025 cancer spreading!
133
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
