Posted:
#151
Thanks, looks to me like hes not healthy enough to effect the game, Illinois State it is..
0
NCAAB WED
Posted:
#154
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:
HAHA c'mon man this team was too young last year and showed promise at times. They are showing it this year though. Everything that Lowe is working on with this group is paying off this season...
My man, NC ST was MUCH more experienced LAST YEAR, this year they are VERY young. Lost 3 3 year starters from last year (which in itself made last years team quite experienced). That being said, NC St is 13-3-1 ATS in last 17 road games, so they certainly seem capable on the road. I think Virginia's better team, so line is fair (given 3.5 pts for home court). Better situation for NC St though Id say
0
Posted:
#156
Quote Originally Posted by iCaNtFe3LMyFaCe:
UnC WhaT u ThinK AbouT ThiS TrenD I SaW On AnotheR BoarD???
am choosing to back the Virginia Cavaliers as teams that beat North Carolina seem to get energized and play well in their next game. Must be a synergy thing. Almost as if that win legitimizes their program or somethin... I don't know. But the results are
Syracuse 11/20 (-13) Win (Cornell)
Kentucky 12/5 (-1) Win (UCONN)
Texas 12/19 (-10) Win (M.State)
Charleston 1/4 (+3.5) Win (Citadel)
Clemson 1/13 (-5)Loss (NC State) * S/U win 73-70
Georgia Tech 1/16 (-1.5) Win (Clemson)
Wake Forest 1/20 (-5.5) Win (Virginia)
Virginia 2/3 ?
So that's a perfect 7-0 straight up and 6-1 ats. That's kind of hard to ignore. And what's funny is that in years' past it's always been the kiss of death for a team to beat the champs.
UnC WhaT u ThinK AbouT ThiS TrenD I SaW On AnotheR BoarD???
am choosing to back the Virginia Cavaliers as teams that beat North Carolina seem to get energized and play well in their next game. Must be a synergy thing. Almost as if that win legitimizes their program or somethin... I don't know. But the results are
Syracuse 11/20 (-13) Win (Cornell)
Kentucky 12/5 (-1) Win (UCONN)
Texas 12/19 (-10) Win (M.State)
Charleston 1/4 (+3.5) Win (Citadel)
Clemson 1/13 (-5)Loss (NC State) * S/U win 73-70
Georgia Tech 1/16 (-1.5) Win (Clemson)
Wake Forest 1/20 (-5.5) Win (Virginia)
Virginia 2/3 ?
So that's a perfect 7-0 straight up and 6-1 ats. That's kind of hard to ignore. And what's funny is that in years' past it's always been the kiss of death for a team to beat the champs.
Cuse, Texas and Kentucky were all better than NC, so I dont really see how they fit in with the rest of these. Charleston then played Citadel, awesome. So really you are just looking at three teams and they are 2-1 ATS. Much a do about nothing if you ask me.
0
Posted:
#159
Quote Originally Posted by gcnmoo:
My man, NC ST was MUCH more experienced LAST YEAR, this year they are VERY young. Lost 3 3 year starters from last year (which in itself made last years team quite experienced). That being said, NC St is 13-3-1 ATS in last 17 road games, so they certainly seem capable on the road. I think Virginia's better team, so line is fair (given 3.5 pts for home court). Better situation for NC St though Id say
I guess what I was more implying was that it was Lowe 2nd year.
0
Posted:
#163
Quote Originally Posted by Sulldog13:
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:
Got me again! Been a hectic day. BOL tonight buddy!
Ya u been 2 busy goin n2 other peoples threads and causing unneeded drama
I felt it was the right time to step in and open some eyes to people. If you have been around this site for a long time you would know.
I did not bash the guy I made simple statements false or not they make sense if you are really reading that thread. I love how people bring up jealous haha are you kidding me. I have nothing to be jealous about.
0
Posted:
#164
Quote Originally Posted by Poundtown55:
UNC- You are not concerned about UVA's Defense in front of what is becoming a rowdy crowd again? Landesberg is money and Zegliski is pretty good as well. Just wondering what your take is on the UVA D, as defense does not take days off.
UNC- You are not concerned about UVA's Defense in front of what is becoming a rowdy crowd again? Landesberg is money and Zegliski is pretty good as well. Just wondering what your take is on the UVA D, as defense does not take days off.
From following UNC's pick he definitely is a situational capper and as he states, all the trends w/ the success NC St has on the road and the potential for a UVA let down are his angles. I agree w/ you from a bball perspective, I like UVA's coach, and I like their players better then NC State almost at every postition. Although I love that Scott vs. Smith match up two of the more underrated players in the big east. Landesberg was a beast at Carolina but I could foresee a let down for him tonight as he was on fire the other night.
I'm staying away as the bball coach and skill angle doesn't totally outweigh the situational angles IMO.
0
Posted:
#167
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:
I felt it was the right time to step in and open some eyes to people. If you have been around this site for a long time you would know.
I did not bash the guy I made simple statements false or not they make sense if you are really reading that thread. I love how people bring up jealous haha are you kidding me. I have nothing to be jealous about.
I've been around hear a long time and seen what you are talking about and it didn't open my eyes! Quite frankly your play last night opened my eyes, and it proves that you are a college kid or recently graduated with a lot to learn... However you have a gift for picking games, but anyone who follows you and lays -120 on a total is an amateur. And 99% of the people wouldn't pick up on what you did last night... It's mind boggling, especially for someone who risks the amount of units you say your risk
0
Posted:
#168
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:
I've been around hear a long time and seen what you are talking about and it didn't open my eyes! Quite frankly your play last night opened my eyes, and it proves that you are a college kid or recently graduated with a lot to learn... However you have a gift for picking games, but anyone who follows you and lays -120 on a total is an amateur. And 99% of the people wouldn't pick up on what you did last night... It's mind boggling, especially for someone who risks the amount of units you say your risk
I've been around hear a long time and seen what you are talking about and it didn't open my eyes! Quite frankly your play last night opened my eyes, and it proves that you are a college kid or recently graduated with a lot to learn... However you have a gift for picking games, but anyone who follows you and lays -120 on a total is an amateur. And 99% of the people wouldn't pick up on what you did last night... It's mind boggling, especially for someone who risks the amount of units you say your risk
0
Posted:
#174
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:
I've been around hear a long time and seen what you are talking about and it didn't open my eyes! Quite frankly your play last night opened my eyes, and it proves that you are a college kid or recently graduated with a lot to learn... However you have a gift for picking games, but anyone who follows you and lays -120 on a total is an amateur. And 99% of the people wouldn't pick up on what you did last night... It's mind boggling, especially for someone who risks the amount of units you say your risk
I've been around hear a long time and seen what you are talking about and it didn't open my eyes! Quite frankly your play last night opened my eyes, and it proves that you are a college kid or recently graduated with a lot to learn... However you have a gift for picking games, but anyone who follows you and lays -120 on a total is an amateur. And 99% of the people wouldn't pick up on what you did last night... It's mind boggling, especially for someone who risks the amount of units you say your risk
Dude we get it already.... how many times are you gonna bring up this buying it to 169 thing. Drop it already
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.