It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts...
Texas on a late 12 - 2 run .......
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run .......
#35 killed the Horns
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run .......
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run .......
Don't worry John Starks is playing for Texas
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run .......
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run ....... #35 killed the Horns
Arguably one of the worst games I've ever seen from a player.
1
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run ....... #35 killed the Horns
Arguably one of the worst games I've ever seen from a player.
#35 killed the Horns Arguably one of the worst games I've ever seen from a player.
Unfortunate. A one-off for Madison BOOKER. Her worst outing of the season, just 3 of 23......otherwise she leads the team, by far, averaging 19.3 ppg..... Her and her teammates are struggling with emotion right now as this is painful.....much like it was for the top ranked UCONN earlier tonight...
She'll return as a senior next year. They only lose 2 of their top 7 scorers. If they can get a good forward to replace OLDACRE then they should be back in the final 4 again next year....
0
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing:
#35 killed the Horns Arguably one of the worst games I've ever seen from a player.
Unfortunate. A one-off for Madison BOOKER. Her worst outing of the season, just 3 of 23......otherwise she leads the team, by far, averaging 19.3 ppg..... Her and her teammates are struggling with emotion right now as this is painful.....much like it was for the top ranked UCONN earlier tonight...
She'll return as a senior next year. They only lose 2 of their top 7 scorers. If they can get a good forward to replace OLDACRE then they should be back in the final 4 again next year....
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run ....... #35 killed the Horns yArguably one of the worst games I've ever seen from a player.
Absolutely the worst display of basketball games (final four) in college basketball history! The best four teams played like SHIT!! I mean how many uncontested lay ups were missed and opened 3 points shot don't even touched the rim. Couldn't believe what I was watching!! Granted defense was good by all 4 teams. Sorry, but WTF am I watching! And Geno was a POOR loser!
2
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing:
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: It's all about momentum at this point.....*IF* Texas can go on a run to close the gap to one shot, they likely turn that into a win... But if UCLA can consistently score to break up any run, then they should keep their lead and win by at least 4 pts... Texas on a late 12 - 2 run ....... #35 killed the Horns yArguably one of the worst games I've ever seen from a player.
Absolutely the worst display of basketball games (final four) in college basketball history! The best four teams played like SHIT!! I mean how many uncontested lay ups were missed and opened 3 points shot don't even touched the rim. Couldn't believe what I was watching!! Granted defense was good by all 4 teams. Sorry, but WTF am I watching! And Geno was a POOR loser!
Fubah… after watching a bit yesterday… I think s Carolina will win this gals hoop game tomorrow…
what’s your take
@Mskeets
Haven't dived into that one just yet, Skeets, but should be intriguing!
Capping men's games now and will look into the WNCAA final later, though Lady Gamecocks looked pretty solid in their "revenge" game vs the top ranked Yukon SledDogs....
1
Quote Originally Posted by Mskeets:
Fubah… after watching a bit yesterday… I think s Carolina will win this gals hoop game tomorrow…
what’s your take
@Mskeets
Haven't dived into that one just yet, Skeets, but should be intriguing!
Capping men's games now and will look into the WNCAA final later, though Lady Gamecocks looked pretty solid in their "revenge" game vs the top ranked Yukon SledDogs....
If it helps... Gamecocks depth, defensive consistency, and experience in title games give them the edge in a slow-paced, physical contest Bruins stays close thanks to Betts’ interior dominance, but Gamecocks ability to generate second-chance points and withstand scoring droughts proves decisive The game likely mirrors both semifinals: grinding, low-tempo, and decided in the final 3–4 minutes. Bruins lean heavily on Kiki Rice, Charisma Osborne, but when Lauren Betts sits, Bruins offense drops dramatically because they lose their interior gravity Meanwhile Gamecocks plays 9–10 players without losing defensive intensity, can rotate fresh bodies at Betts survive foul trouble far better Gamecocks didn’t just beat Yukon SledDogs - they controlled the game physically, that kind of win reinforces identity builds confidence travels well to a neutral site Bruins win over Longhorns was gritty, but not dominant Why it matters, in a defensive slugfest, the team with more ways to score usually survives the droughts Gamecocks by 4-5 or 1H -1.5
Thank for always being such a great sport fubah2
1
If it helps... Gamecocks depth, defensive consistency, and experience in title games give them the edge in a slow-paced, physical contest Bruins stays close thanks to Betts’ interior dominance, but Gamecocks ability to generate second-chance points and withstand scoring droughts proves decisive The game likely mirrors both semifinals: grinding, low-tempo, and decided in the final 3–4 minutes. Bruins lean heavily on Kiki Rice, Charisma Osborne, but when Lauren Betts sits, Bruins offense drops dramatically because they lose their interior gravity Meanwhile Gamecocks plays 9–10 players without losing defensive intensity, can rotate fresh bodies at Betts survive foul trouble far better Gamecocks didn’t just beat Yukon SledDogs - they controlled the game physically, that kind of win reinforces identity builds confidence travels well to a neutral site Bruins win over Longhorns was gritty, but not dominant Why it matters, in a defensive slugfest, the team with more ways to score usually survives the droughts Gamecocks by 4-5 or 1H -1.5
If it helps... Gamecocks depth, defensive consistency, and experience in title games give them the edge in a slow-paced, physical contest Bruins stays close thanks to Betts’ interior dominance, but Gamecocks ability to generate second-chance points and withstand scoring droughts proves decisive The game likely mirrors both semifinals: grinding, low-tempo, and decided in the final 3–4 minutes. Bruins lean heavily on Kiki Rice, Charisma Osborne, but when Lauren Betts sits, Bruins offense drops dramatically because they lose their interior gravity Meanwhile Gamecocks plays 9–10 players without losing defensive intensity, can rotate fresh bodies at Betts survive foul trouble far better Gamecocks didn’t just beat Yukon SledDogs - they controlled the game physically, that kind of win reinforces identity builds confidence travels well to a neutral site Bruins win over Longhorns was gritty, but not dominant Why it matters, in a defensive slugfest, the team with more ways to score usually survives the droughts Gamecocks by 4-5 or 1H -1.5 Thank for always being such a great sport fubah2
@Skware
Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final!
I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise...
1
Quote Originally Posted by Skware:
If it helps... Gamecocks depth, defensive consistency, and experience in title games give them the edge in a slow-paced, physical contest Bruins stays close thanks to Betts’ interior dominance, but Gamecocks ability to generate second-chance points and withstand scoring droughts proves decisive The game likely mirrors both semifinals: grinding, low-tempo, and decided in the final 3–4 minutes. Bruins lean heavily on Kiki Rice, Charisma Osborne, but when Lauren Betts sits, Bruins offense drops dramatically because they lose their interior gravity Meanwhile Gamecocks plays 9–10 players without losing defensive intensity, can rotate fresh bodies at Betts survive foul trouble far better Gamecocks didn’t just beat Yukon SledDogs - they controlled the game physically, that kind of win reinforces identity builds confidence travels well to a neutral site Bruins win over Longhorns was gritty, but not dominant Why it matters, in a defensive slugfest, the team with more ways to score usually survives the droughts Gamecocks by 4-5 or 1H -1.5 Thank for always being such a great sport fubah2
@Skware
Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final!
I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise...
Quote Originally Posted by Skware: If it helps... Gamecocks depth, defensive consistency, and experience in title games give them the edge in a slow-paced, physical contest Bruins stays close thanks to Betts’ interior dominance, but Gamecocks ability to generate second-chance points and withstand scoring droughts proves decisive The game likely mirrors both semifinals: grinding, low-tempo, and decided in the final 3–4 minutes. Bruins lean heavily on Kiki Rice, Charisma Osborne, but when Lauren Betts sits, Bruins offense drops dramatically because they lose their interior gravity Meanwhile Gamecocks plays 9–10 players without losing defensive intensity, can rotate fresh bodies at Betts survive foul trouble far better Gamecocks didn’t just beat Yukon SledDogs - they controlled the game physically, that kind of win reinforces identity builds confidence travels well to a neutral site Bruins win over Longhorns was gritty, but not dominant Why it matters, in a defensive slugfest, the team with more ways to score usually survives the droughts Gamecocks by 4-5 or 1H -1.5 Thank for always being such a great sport fubah2 @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise...
The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Skware: If it helps... Gamecocks depth, defensive consistency, and experience in title games give them the edge in a slow-paced, physical contest Bruins stays close thanks to Betts’ interior dominance, but Gamecocks ability to generate second-chance points and withstand scoring droughts proves decisive The game likely mirrors both semifinals: grinding, low-tempo, and decided in the final 3–4 minutes. Bruins lean heavily on Kiki Rice, Charisma Osborne, but when Lauren Betts sits, Bruins offense drops dramatically because they lose their interior gravity Meanwhile Gamecocks plays 9–10 players without losing defensive intensity, can rotate fresh bodies at Betts survive foul trouble far better Gamecocks didn’t just beat Yukon SledDogs - they controlled the game physically, that kind of win reinforces identity builds confidence travels well to a neutral site Bruins win over Longhorns was gritty, but not dominant Why it matters, in a defensive slugfest, the team with more ways to score usually survives the droughts Gamecocks by 4-5 or 1H -1.5 Thank for always being such a great sport fubah2 @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise...
The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml
@Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml
Seeing the same lines
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
@Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml
Seeing the same lines
As anticipated, money has come in on S.Carol at B365 and pushed their line up to -4.5 or -185 ml. I expect other books will rise too...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skware:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml
Seeing the same lines
As anticipated, money has come in on S.Carol at B365 and pushed their line up to -4.5 or -185 ml. I expect other books will rise too...
Quote Originally Posted by Skware: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml Seeing the same lines As anticipated, money has come in on S.Carol at B365 and pushed their line up to -4.5 or -185 ml. I expect other books will rise too...
WNCAAtitle . . .
LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Skware: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml Seeing the same lines As anticipated, money has come in on S.Carol at B365 and pushed their line up to -4.5 or -185 ml. I expect other books will rise too...
WNCAAtitle . . .
LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Skware: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml Seeing the same lines As anticipated, money has come in on S.Carol at B365 and pushed their line up to -4.5 or -185 ml. I expect other books will rise too... WNCAA title . . . LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn
My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number if they score 18+ at first Q split and hopefullyat least 35+ by HT
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Skware: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @Skware Nice!! And it does help! I'll definitely keep your points in mind when I get down to capping the Women's final! I also think the line on S.Carol is going to rise... The odds I see available currently are -3.5 or -170 ml Seeing the same lines As anticipated, money has come in on S.Carol at B365 and pushed their line up to -4.5 or -185 ml. I expect other books will rise too... WNCAA title . . . LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn
My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number if they score 18+ at first Q split and hopefullyat least 35+ by HT
My expectation is that UCLA will improve off their record 223 turnovers vs Texas and awful 18 turnovers vs DUKE.....probability tells me such high numbers are UNlikely to repeat (ie, regression to the mean - which is much much lower) and thus increase their scoring output...
0
My expectation is that UCLA will improve off their record 223 turnovers vs Texas and awful 18 turnovers vs DUKE.....probability tells me such high numbers are UNlikely to repeat (ie, regression to the mean - which is much much lower) and thus increase their scoring output...
LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number if they score 18+ at first Q split and hopefully at least 35+ by HT
My LADY BRUINS lead (tentatively) 21 - 10 after 1.....this margin is not expected to hold for long though.... and I still anticipate a closer game by HT.....the ml on UCLA is -250 and that's too high to risk at this moment against a very good team!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
WNCAA title . . .
LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number if they score 18+ at first Q split and hopefully at least 35+ by HT
My LADY BRUINS lead (tentatively) 21 - 10 after 1.....this margin is not expected to hold for long though.... and I still anticipate a closer game by HT.....the ml on UCLA is -250 and that's too high to risk at this moment against a very good team!
WNCAA title . . . LEANINGto Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn
My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number ifthey score 18+ at first Q split and hopefully at least 35+ by HT
ML on UCLA keeps rising.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
WNCAA title . . . LEANINGto Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first...
UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn
My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number ifthey score 18+ at first Q split and hopefully at least 35+ by HT
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: WNCAA title . . . LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first... UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number if they score 18+ at first Q split and hopefully at least 35+ by HT
ML on UCLA keeps rising.....
Mid-2Q BRUINS lead 32 - 17....gameline is UCLA -6.5 now or -425 ml (B365)
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: WNCAA title . . . LEANING to Lady Bruins getting pts but I'll watch & wait in hopes of getting more points, provided they are otherwise playing well. The game/line just looks too close to call. Doesn't hurt to watch first... UCLA tt over 61.5 -103 @pinn My capping indicates UCLA should exceed their tt number if they score 18+ at first Q split and hopefully at least 35+ by HT
ML on UCLA keeps rising.....
Mid-2Q BRUINS lead 32 - 17....gameline is UCLA -6.5 now or -425 ml (B365)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.