Posted:
#1426
Updated YTD: 131 - 77 63.0%
2
🍀🍀🍀 NCAA MEN's: 201 - 103 ... +75.96u
Posted:
#1438
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Updated YTD: 129 - 73 63.8% 59 - 25 *Best Bets! 70.2%
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Updated YTD: 129 - 73 63.8% 59 - 25 *Best Bets! 70.2%
Brother, do you have a record of your actual units won in this 59-25 record on best bets? Reason I asked is because sometimes you would bet heavy moneylines like -350 and we sometimes win, sometimes lose on those.
0
Posted:
#1439
Quote Originally Posted by Tailer187:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Updated YTD: 129 - 73 63.8% 59 - 25 *Best Bets! 70.2%
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Updated YTD: 129 - 73 63.8% 59 - 25 *Best Bets! 70.2%
Brother, do you have a record of your actual units won in this 59-25 record on best bets?
Reason I asked is because sometimes you would bet heavy moneylines like -350 and we sometimes win, sometimes lose on those.
You're right; good point.
Will search and update then post the details, but could take awhile as I am trying to analyze the Ladies games now... 
1
Posted:
#1440
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Tailer187: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Updated YTD: 129 - 73 63.8% 59 - 25 *Best Bets! 70.2% Brother, do you have a record of your actual units won in this 59-25 record on best bets? Reason I asked is because sometimes you would bet heavy moneylines like -350 and we sometimes win, sometimes lose on those. You're right; good point. Will search and update then post the details, but could take awhile as I am trying to analyze the Ladies games now...
Quote Originally Posted by Tailer187: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Updated YTD: 129 - 73 63.8% 59 - 25 *Best Bets! 70.2% Brother, do you have a record of your actual units won in this 59-25 record on best bets? Reason I asked is because sometimes you would bet heavy moneylines like -350 and we sometimes win, sometimes lose on those. You're right; good point. Will search and update then post the details, but could take awhile as I am trying to analyze the Ladies games now...
@Tailer187
OK....here's the update on my *Best bets ending last night:
61 - 28 (listed juice on those 28 losses totals -4098)
Pre-Game posted *BBs: 47 - 26 (juice on those 26 losses totals -3783)
*BBs with juice -200 and up: 18 - 4 (Losers were -200; -240; 250; 260 )
1
Posted:
#1443
@fubah2
Thanks for clarifying for us, you’re a real man of the people! I, however, have little to no math knowledge in my brain. So could you explain this just if say you were a $100/unit better, and how the juice adds up in relation to that. I apologize, I spent the last 15 minutes trying to do the math myself and failed miserably lol
1
Posted:
#1445
Quote Originally Posted by papiversace15:
Pre-Game posted *BBs: 47 - 26 (juice on those 26 losses totals -3783)
@fubah2 Thanks for clarifying for us, you’re a real man of the people! I, however, have little to no math knowledge in my brain. So could you explain this just if say you were a $100/unit bettor, and how the juice adds up in relation to that. I apologize, I spent the last 15 minutes trying to do the math myself and failed miserably lol
@papiversace15
Ok... We would look at it based on "internet common/standard scoring" - which is to say we count each bet by laying the juice to win $100 (which would be considered ONE UNIT per your example).
I have a -150 su bet on Arkansas tonight: if it wins then I am scored at +100 regardless what I actually wagered on it, be it $10 or $10,000....it still gets counted officially as +100. But if the -150 bet loses, then I am officially scored at -150 (again regardless how much I actually wagered)
So either 1 - 0, +100 or 0 - 1, -150 (alternatively: +1.0 unit, OR -1.5 units)
Therefore, with this in mind, if anyone from the forum or the many hundreds of lurkers reading the forum who do not participate, were to bet to win $100 on all my PREGAME POSTED *Best Bets (shown above) right from the get-go, then that person would have achieved a betting record on his "tails" of
47 wins at + $100 per win = +$4700
vs
26 losses, which total -$3783 juice wagered and lost,
>>>>> for a net profit of +$917 
on a 64.3% win rate, in just over 6 weeks, for the $100 bettor
2
Posted:
#1447
Quote Originally Posted by papiversace15:
@fubah2 Awesome, really appreciate that!
@fubah2 Awesome, really appreciate that!
You're welcome!
Same method of calculation is applicable to everyone's posted records on Covers.com
All scored as if betting to win $100 (ie, counted as just one unit per bet regardless actual $$$ (units) wagered)
Multiply all the wins by 100 and subtract the juice from all the losses.
1
Posted:
#1448
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Lean to AUBURN ...but NOT at this DD spread! During live play, this line must fall well into single-digits or I pass... LEAN to Tex A&M but could be short a starter tonight...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Lean to AUBURN ...but NOT at this DD spread! During live play, this line must fall well into single-digits or I pass... LEAN to Tex A&M but could be short a starter tonight...
I caught em -2.5 live
GL! Second half blowout coming
Never told why I was banned and gave my best always to the forums
0
Posted:
#1450
Quote Originally Posted by JJWoods:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Lean to AUBURN ...but NOT at this DD spread! During live play, this line must fall well into single-digits or I pass... LEAN to Tex A&M but could be short a starter tonight... I caught em -2.5 live GL! Second half blowout coming
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Lean to AUBURN ...but NOT at this DD spread! During live play, this line must fall well into single-digits or I pass... LEAN to Tex A&M but could be short a starter tonight... I caught em -2.5 live GL! Second half blowout coming
JJ, win or lose, THANKS for the reminder as I had temporarily forgot about this lean!
0
Hot Forum Topics
