North Carolina @ Pittsburgh Game Overview
UNC vs PITTRecords
Head-To-HeadLast 10
| Date | Home | Result | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, '24 | UNC |
72 - 65
|
PITT 7.5 | u148.0 |
| Jan 02, '24 | PITT |
70 - 57
|
UNC -4.0 | u158.0 |
| Feb 01, '23 | UNC |
65 - 64
|
PITT 8.5 | u146.0 |
| Dec 30, '22 | PITT |
76 - 74
|
PITT 6.5 | o149.5 |
| Feb 16, '22 | UNC |
76 - 67
|
PITT 13.5 | o142.0 |
| Jan 26, '21 | PITT |
75 - 65
|
UNC -3.5 | u146.0 |
| Jan 18, '20 | PITT |
66 - 52
|
PITT -3.0 | u136.0 |
| Jan 08, '20 | UNC |
73 - 65
|
PITT 4.5 | u139.0 |
| Jan 05, '19 | PITT |
85 - 60
|
UNC -10.0 | u157.0 |
| Feb 03, '18 | UNC |
96 - 65
|
UNC -23.5 | o141.5 |
UNC vs PITT Preview
Last Meeting ( Mar 15, 2024 ) Pittsburgh 65, North Carolina 72
Both coming off wins and needing more to boost their respective NCAA Tournament resumes, visiting North Carolina and Pitt will tangle on Tuesday night.
The Tar Heels (13-8, 6-3 ACC) and Panthers (13-6, 4-4) both ended losing streaks on Saturday. On its home floor, North Carolina squeaked out a six-point overtime victory over Boston College, while Pitt bested Syracuse by four points in upstate New York.
According to the current NET rankings, a victory for UNC on Tuesday would go down as a Quad 1 win, while a triumph for Pitt would be a tally in the Quad 2 column. The teams will also play on Feb. 8 in Chapel Hill, N.C.
Without Armando Bacot patrolling the paint this season, the Tar Heels have opted for a small-ball, fast-paced style that has them scoring 82.5 points per game, which ranks second in the ACC. The Tar Heels, however, haven't been all that effective on 3-point attempts. Their 32.3 percent success rate is 13th in the ACC.
"The makeup of their team is different. At times, like last game, they started four guards. So, if any of those guards get it, they're all able to push and attack," Pitt coach Jeff Capel said of the Tar Heels. "I do think they're playing faster than they have the past few years."
Those guards all score in double figures. RJ Davis puts up 17.7 points per game, followed by Ian Jackson (15), Seth Trimble (12.4) and Elliot Cadeau (10.7, plus a team-high 6.1 assists). Davis, an All-American a season ago, had 22 points against Boston College.
Pitt has its own talented guards leading the way: sophomore Jaland Lowe and senior Ishmael Leggett. Lowe posts 17.6 points and 5.7 assists per game, while Leggett averages 16.6 points and 5.6 rebounds.
Against Syracuse, the backcourt duo combined for 38 points, eight rebounds and six assists.
"They've got a number of guys that can get hot from 3. They've got guards that are good with the ball, whether it's one-on-one or pick-and-roll situations. They can create shots not only for themselves, but for their teammates," UNC coach Hubert Davis said of Pitt. "Coach Capel does a great job."
North Carolina is beginning a stretch of four road games in their next five. The Tar Heels swept the Panthers last season and are 10-7 against Pitt since it joined the ACC in 2013.
--Field Level Media
UNC vs PITTInjury report
North Carolina's Injuries
| Player | POS | Status | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Denis | G | Questionable - Finger( Oct 12, '25) | Oct 12, '25 | |
| Denis is dealing with a finger injury and is uncertain to take the court for the Tar Heels. | ||||
Pittsburgh's Injuries
| Player | POS | Status | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No injuries to report. | ||||
UNC vs PITTStats
Offense vs Defense
Key Stats League ranks in parenthesis
| OFFENSE |
Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.0 | (33) | FG% | (193) | 42.4 |
| 29.1 | (20) | FGM | (135) | 25.0 |
| 61.9 | (75) | FGA | (104) | 58.9 |
| 32.3 | (99) | 3P% | (285) | 33.3 |
| 7.3 | (161) | 3PM | (275) | 7.9 |
| 22.6 | (196) | 3PA | (218) | 23.7 |
| 75.0 | (116) | FT% | (203) | 70.7 |
| 17.0 | (78) | FTM | (179) | 13.1 |
| 22.7 | (83) | FTA | (172) | 18.5 |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 44.1 |
| 26.0 |
| 58.9 |
| 33.5 |
| 7.8 |
| 23.1 |
| 71.4 |
| 13.6 |
| 19.1 |
More Stats
| OFFENSE |
Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.3 | (120) | REB | (134) | 30.6 |
| 7.7 | (269) | OREB | (93) | 8.6 |
| 26.6 | (179) | DREB | (248) | 22.0 |
| 14.4 | (101) | AST | (180) | 12.1 |
| 10.9 | (82) | TO | (162) | 12.4 |
| 1.3 | (68) | AST/TO | (172) | 1.0 |
| 6.5 | (99) | STL | (131) | 5.2 |
| 3.9 | (317) | BLK | (68) | 2.7 |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 32.0 |
| 9.0 |
| 23.0 |
| 13.7 |
| 12.4 |
| 1.1 |
| 7.0 |
| 3.3 |
Points
| OFFENSE |
Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.5 | (23) | Points | (159) | 70.9 |
| 36.8 | (138) | 1st Half | (275) | 33.4 |
| 44.7 | (138) | 2nd Half | (275) | 36.2 |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 73.3 |
| 34.6 |
| 38.1 |