- Stats
- Picks
- Odds
Clemson vs Virginia Tech Results, Match Player Stats & Records
| Team | 1 | 2 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41 | 31 | 72 |
|
|
29 | 28 | 57 |
Game Info
Location Cassell Coliseum
Attendance 8,925 attendance
Bet Graph
| Team | ATS (Margin) | O/U (Margin) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
-8.5 (+6.5) | 135.5o |
|
|
+8.5 | 135.5u (6.5) |
Player Stats
| Player | POS | MIN | FGM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | +/- | OFF | DEF | TOT | A | PF | STL | TO | BLK | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Zackery | 38:00 | 4-11 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| C. Wiggins | 34:00 | 6-11 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | |
| I. Schieffelin | 28:00 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| V. Lakhin | 20:00 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | |
| D. Hunter | 18:00 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| D. Jones | 24:00 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | |
| J. Heidbreder | 18:00 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| C. Hunter | 10:00 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| M. Foster | 6:00 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| C. Reeves | 4:00 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| J. Roberts | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| D. Nauseef | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| A. Buckner | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| M. Kelly | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| A. Latiff | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| D. Thomas | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| A. Thomas | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 200:00 | 28-58 | 7-21 | 9-13 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 12 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 72 | ||
| 48% | 33% | 69% | |||||||||||||
| Player | POS | MIN | FGM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | +/- | OFF | DEF | TOT | A | PF | STL | TO | BLK | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Johnson | 26:00 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | |
| T. Lawal | 25:00 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 2-8 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| J. Schutt | 21:00 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| M. Poteat | 19:00 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| B. Hammond | 14:00 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| B. Burnham | 28:00 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| J. Young | 24:00 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |
| R. Brown | 19:00 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| B. Rechsteiner | 15:00 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| P. Wessler | 9:00 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| C. Serven | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| R. Jones | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| C. Venable | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| P. Carr | DNP | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 200:00 | 19-50 | 7-19 | 12-21 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 10 | 15 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 57 | ||
| 38% | 37% | 57% | |||||||||||||
CLEM vs VTRecords
Head-To-HeadLast 10
| Date | Home | Result | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, '24 | VT |
|
VT 2.0 | o144.5 |
| Jan 21, '23 | CLEM |
|
VT 1.5 | u142.5 |
| Jan 04, '23 | VT |
|
CLEM 6.0 | u137.0 |
| Mar 09, '22 | VT |
|
CLEM 3.5 | o131.0 |
| Mar 05, '22 | CLEM |
|
CLEM 2.5 | u132.5 |
| Dec 15, '20 | VT |
|
VT -2.0 | u127.5 |
| Mar 04, '20 | VT |
|
VT -1.5 | P128.0 |
| Nov 05, '19 | CLEM |
|
VT 7.0 | u129.5 |
| Feb 09, '19 | CLEM |
|
CLEM -3.0 | u126.5 |
| Feb 21, '18 | VT |
|
VT -4.0 | u141.0 |
CLEM vs VT Preview
Last Meeting ( Jan 10, 2024 ) Clemson 72, Virginia Tech 87
Off to its second-best start ever in ACC play, Clemson might be tempted to look ahead two weeks when the Tigers host conference blue bloods Duke and North Carolina in a span of three days.
But first, Clemson (16-4, 8-1) must take care of business against three teams with losing records in the conference, including Virginia Tech (8-11, 3-5) on Saturday in Blacksburg, Va.
Since back-to-back overtime losses in December to Memphis and South Carolina, Clemson has won seven of eight games to establish itself as a contender for the ACC regular-season title.
In his sixth season in a Clemson uniform, Chase Hunter has been the constant for the Tigers, averaging a team-high 17.9 points per game.
"His shooting has improved over the course of his career dramatically," Clemson coach Brad Brownell said after Hunter scored 23 points in an 86-72 win Wednesday at home over Syracuse.
In increasing his scoring average by 5.0 points per game, Hunter has jacked up his overall marksmanship from 42.4 percent a season ago to 50 percent. He's also vastly improved from 3-point range, hitting an ACC-best 46.2 percent, up from 31.1 percent in 2023-24.
Clemson's top inside threat, Ian Schieffelin, is putting up 12.9 points, while his 9.9 rebounds per game ranks second in the league.
Unlike Clemson, Virginia Tech has struggled to find a go-to threat. In seven of the Hokies' last eight games, they've had a different high scorer.
After opening the calendar year with three wins in four games, the Hokies have dropped their last two, including a 71-64 loss Wednesday at Georgia Tech.
The defeat was particularly discouraging because the Yellow Jackets entered on a four-game losing streak and were without four rotation players, including top scorer Lance Terry.
"Certainly their (lack of) depth, I thought that would work to our advantage down the stretch. It was the polar opposite," Virginia Tech coach Mike Young said of his team, which was outscored 10-4 over the final 4:04.
The Hokies are led by frontcourt players Tobi Lawal (12.5 points, 6.5 rebounds) and Mylyjael Poteat (10.4 points).
--Field Level Media
CLEM vs VTInjury report
Clemson's Injuries
| Player | POS | Status | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No injuries to report. | ||||
Virginia Tech's Injuries
| Player | POS | Status | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No injuries to report. | ||||
CLEM vs VTStats
Offense vs Defense
Key Stats League ranks in parenthesis
| Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.7 | (64) | FG% | (276) | 45.4 |
| 27.6 | (64) | FGM | (219) | 25.4 |
| 59.0 | (134) | FGA | (120) | 56.1 |
| 39.2 | (22) | 3P% | (117) | 33.0 |
| 9.3 | (75) | 3PM | (191) | 8.0 |
| 23.8 | (159) | 3PA | (224) | 24.2 |
| 77.7 | (38) | FT% | (347) | 75.9 |
| 13.2 | (266) | FTM | (196) | 14.1 |
| 17.1 | (318) | FTA | (142) | 18.6 |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 44.1 |
| 26.0 |
| 58.9 |
| 33.5 |
| 7.8 |
| 23.1 |
| 71.4 |
| 13.6 |
| 19.1 |
More Stats
| Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.2 | (153) | REB | (66) | 27.6 |
| 9.6 | (119) | OREB | (95) | 7.9 |
| 22.6 | (45) | DREB | (287) | 19.7 |
| 14.8 | (98) | AST | (278) | 13.9 |
| 10.7 | (48) | TO | (290) | 11.1 |
| 1.4 | (48) | AST/TO | (312) | 1.3 |
| 7.7 | (93) | STL | (319) | 6.9 |
| 3.4 | (89) | BLK | (349) | 3.5 |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 32.0 |
| 9.0 |
| 23.0 |
| 13.7 |
| 12.4 |
| 1.1 |
| 7.0 |
| 3.3 |
Points
| Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.7 | (96) | Points | (217) | 72.9 |
| 37.0 | (297) | 1st Half | (2) | 33.3 |
| 39.1 | (297) | 2nd Half | (2) | 39.6 |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 73.4 |
| 34.7 |
| 38.2 |