Philadelphia Phillies Picks
2nd in National League East
(50 - 41)
Next Game
Tue, Jul 7
19:10 ET
PHI @ CIN Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Elly De La Cruz as the 6th-best hitter in Major League Baseball when assessing his BABIP skill.. Elly De La Cruz is projected to bat 1st on the lineup card in today's game.. Great American Ball Park projects as the #1 ballpark in the league for left-handed home runs, via the leading projection system (THE BAT).. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. The switch-hitting Elly De La Cruz will get to bat from his strong side (0) today against Zack Wheeler... and even better, Wheeler has a large platoon split.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Noelvi Marte's batting average talent is projected to be in the 83rd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. In the majors, Great American Ball Park's left field dimensions are the 5th-shallowest.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Home field advantage typically bolsters hitter stats in all categories, and Noelvi Marte will hold that advantage today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Eugenio Suarez in the 96th percentile as it relates to his home run skill.. Eugenio Suarez is penciled in 4th on the lineup card today.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Eugenio Suarez pulls a lot of his flyballs (38.7% — 95th percentile) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them towards MLB's 8th-shallowest LF fences in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
JJ Bleday is projected to bat 3rd in the lineup in this game.. Great American Ball Park projects as the #1 ballpark in the league for left-handed home runs, via the leading projection system (THE BAT).. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Considering Zack Wheeler's large platoon split, JJ Bleday will have a big advantage batting from the opposite side of the dish in today's game.. JJ Bleday pulls a high percentage of his flyballs (37.2% — 92nd percentile) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them towards baseball's 8th-shallowest RF fences today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
According to the leading projection system (THE BAT X), Bryce Harper ranks as the 10th-best batter in the game.. Bryce Harper is penciled in 3rd in the lineup in today's game.. Great American Ball Park projects as the #1 ballpark in the league for left-handed home runs, via the leading projection system (THE BAT).. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Bryce Harper has an 80th percentile opposite-field rate on his flyballs (33.6%) and has the good fortune of hitting them towards the league's 8th-shallowest LF fences in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Sal Stewart in the 93rd percentile when assessing his batting average ability.. Sal Stewart is penciled in 2nd on the lineup card in today's game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Sal Stewart has a 95th percentile opposite-field rate on his flyballs (37%) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them out towards MLB's 8th-shallowest RF fences in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Tyler Stephenson in the 81st percentile as it relates to his BABIP skill.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Tyler Stephenson has an 85th percentile opposite-field rate on his flyballs (34.5%) and has the good fortune of hitting them towards baseball's 8th-shallowest RF fences in today's matchup.. Home field advantage typically bolsters batter stats across the board, and Tyler Stephenson will hold that advantage in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Alec Bohm's batting average talent is projected to be in the 96th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Alec Bohm is projected to hit 4th in the batting order in today's game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Alec Bohm will hold the platoon advantage against Andrew Abbott in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Edmundo Sosa in the 79th percentile when assessing his batting average skill.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. In the majors, Great American Ball Park's left field dimensions are the 5th-shallowest.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Hitting from the opposite that Andrew Abbott throws from, Edmundo Sosa will have the upper hand in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Derek Hill in the 96th percentile when estimating his BABIP talent.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best field in the league for righty home runs.. In the majors, Great American Ball Park's left field dimensions are the 5th-shallowest.. The weather report forecasts temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level of all games on the slate today at 86°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. Batting from the opposite that Andrew Abbott throws from, Derek Hill will have an edge today.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusPHI @ CIN · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Sosa
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Schwarber
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-0.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.06
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-2.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Hill
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.76
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Harper
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-3.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Stott
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Marte
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Suarez
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Lowe
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Marsh
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.17
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-6.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Bleday
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Stewart
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Arroyo
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-7.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
18.62%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Marte
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. Suarez
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
17.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Bleday
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
17.09%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Harper
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
16.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Stewart
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
15.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.29%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
13.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. Sosa
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Hill
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Lowe
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Marsh
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
10.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Stott
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.01
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
4.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.67
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
1.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Marte
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
15.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Suarez
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.23
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.97%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
5.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Bleday
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Stewart
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.22
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Hill
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Stott
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Schwarber
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Marsh
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Turner
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.18
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Harper
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Lowe
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Sosa
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
A. Abbott
(SP)
5.5 Strikeouts Thrown
5.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Suarez
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
19.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Marte
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
17.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Bleday
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
17.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Harper
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
16.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.04%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Hill
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.87%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Lowe
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Sosa
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.11%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Stewart
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
12.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Stott
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Marsh
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Arroyo
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Turner
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.61%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Schwarber
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.82
PROJECTION
+1.3
DIFFERENCE
17.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Bleday
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
16.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Suarez
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
16.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Harper
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.73
PROJECTION
+1.2
DIFFERENCE
16.15%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.35
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
15.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Stewart
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.25
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
13.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
13.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Lowe
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
12.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.45
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
11.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.11
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Stott
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Sosa
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
10.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Marsh
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.09
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Hill
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.91%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Arroyo
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.68%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
E. Sosa
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.53%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. Schwarber
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-0.78%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.06
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-2.3%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Hill
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.76
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.06%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.42%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Harper
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-3.48%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Stott
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.6%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.63%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.05%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Marte
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.37%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. Suarez
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.45%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Lowe
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.45%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Marsh
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.68%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.17
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-6.25%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Bleday
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.4%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Stewart
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.75%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. Arroyo
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-7.22%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
18.62%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Marte
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.42%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. Suarez
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
17.78%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Bleday
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
17.09%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Harper
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
16.54%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Stewart
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
15.08%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.29%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
13.24%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. Sosa
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.75%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Hill
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.35%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Lowe
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.18%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Marsh
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
10.06%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Stott
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.01
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
4.14%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.67
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
1.25%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Marte
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
15.5%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Suarez
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.23
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.97%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
5.08%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Bleday
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.76%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Stewart
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.22
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.66%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Hill
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Stott
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.13%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.51%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Schwarber
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.25%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Marsh
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.73%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Turner
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.18
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.44%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Harper
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.47%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Lowe
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.84%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.25%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Sosa
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.6%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
A. Abbott
(SP)
5.5 Strikeouts Thrown
5.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.31%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Suarez
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
19.06%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Marte
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
17.45%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Bleday
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.2%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
17.02%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Harper
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
16.93%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.76%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.04%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Hill
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.87%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Lowe
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.38%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Sosa
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.11%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Stewart
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.85%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
12.24%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Stott
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.2%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.96%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Marsh
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.5%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Arroyo
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.59%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Turner
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.61%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Schwarber
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.82
PROJECTION
+1.3
DIFFERENCE
17.17%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Bleday
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.20
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
16.76%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Suarez
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
16.51%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Harper
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.73
PROJECTION
+1.2
DIFFERENCE
16.15%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.35
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
15.82%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Stewart
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.25
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
13.93%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
13.42%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Lowe
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
12.64%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.45
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
11.53%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.11
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.99%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Stott
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.68%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Sosa
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
10.27%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Marsh
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.09
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Hill
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.91%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.63%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Arroyo
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.68%
EV
PHI @ CIN · Trends
Over
Under
PHI
CIN
Over
Under
PHI
CIN
Over
Under
PHI
CIN
PHI
CIN
Over
Under