Detroit vs Cincinnati Picks & Props
DET vs CIN Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his BABIP skill, Riley Greene is projected as the 20th-best hitter in the game by the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Riley Greene is penciled in 4th in the batting order today.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in baseball for left-handed home runs.. Among all parks, Great American Ball Park's RF fences are the 8th-shallowest.. Batting from the opposite that Rhett Lowder throws from, Riley Greene will have the upper hand in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in baseball for left-handed home runs.. As a switch-hitter who bats better from the 0 side of the plate, Wenceel Perez will have the advantage of batting from from his better side against Rhett Lowder in today's matchup.. Wenceel Perez pulls a lot of his flyballs (34.1% — 77th percentile) and will have a big advantage hitting them towards the game's 8th-shallowest RF fences in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When estimating his home run talent, Kerry Carpenter ranks in the 96th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in baseball for left-handed home runs.. Kerry Carpenter will receive the benefit of the platoon advantage against Rhett Lowder in today's matchup.. Kerry Carpenter pulls many of his flyballs (37.5% — 92nd percentile) and will have a big advantage hitting them towards MLB's 8th-shallowest RF fences today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Sal Stewart as the 18th-best batter in the league as it relates to his batting average talent.. Sal Stewart is projected to hit 4th on the lineup card in today's game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in MLB for right-handed home runs.. Sal Stewart has an 81st percentile opposite-field rate on his flyballs (33.9%) and has the good fortune of hitting them out towards MLB's 8th-shallowest RF fences today.. Sal Stewart will possess the home field advantage today, which figures to improve all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Kevin McGonigle's batting average talent is projected to be in the 91st percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Kevin McGonigle is projected to hit 1st on the lineup card in this game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in baseball for left-handed home runs.. Among all parks, Great American Ball Park's RF fences are the 8th-shallowest.. Kevin McGonigle will have the handedness advantage against Rhett Lowder today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his home run ability, Spencer Torkelson ranks in the 91st percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in MLB for right-handed home runs.. Spencer Torkelson pulls a lot of his flyballs (39.5% — 97th percentile) and has the good fortune of hitting them towards the league's 8th-shallowest LF fences today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his BABIP talent, Elly De La Cruz is projected as the 6th-best hitter in the game by the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Elly De La Cruz is penciled in 3rd in the batting order today.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in baseball for left-handed home runs.. As a switch-hitter who is stronger from the 0 side of the plate, Elly De La Cruz will hold the platoon advantage while batting from from his good side against Keider Montero in today's game.. Elly De La Cruz has an 88th percentile opposite-field rate on his flyballs (35.2%) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them out towards baseball's 8th-shallowest LF fences today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Dillon Dingler in the 88th percentile when it comes to his BABIP skill.. Dillon Dingler is penciled in 5th in the batting order in this game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Great American Ball Park as the best stadium in MLB for right-handed home runs.. The 7th-shallowest LF fences in MLB are found in Great American Ball Park.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Keider Montero to throw 82 pitches in this game (3rd-least of all pitchers on the slate today), considering both his underlying tendencies and the matchup.. Keider Montero will be at a disadvantage playing on the visting team in today's game.. Contrary to popular belief, fastballs are generally a pitcher's least effective pitch. Keider Montero has gone to his non-fastballs 5% less often this year (43.6%) than he did last season (48.6%).. Keider Montero has put up an 8.3% Swinging Strike rate since the start of last season, grading out in the 20th percentile.. Checking in at the 24th percentile, Keider Montero has compiled an 18.6% Strikeout% since the start of last season.
DET vs CIN Consensus Picks
DET vs CIN Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
CIN
+1.5 spread
0.08
PROJECTION
-1.4
DIFFERENCE
1.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
W. Perez
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
1.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Lowe
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-3.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.14
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-3.79%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Baez
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Stewart
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-4.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Keith
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.81%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. McLain
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-7.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-7.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-7.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
17.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
W. Perez
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
17.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Carpenter
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
17.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Stewart
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
15.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
15.58%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
12.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. McLain
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.00
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
9.04%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Lowe
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Baez
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.90
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-29.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Keith
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.93
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-29.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
0.90
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
2.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. McLain
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Stewart
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Keith
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Baez
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-13.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Lowe
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-17.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-17.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
K. Montero
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. McLain
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.98%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
W. Perez
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
15.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Stewart
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.87%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Keith
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Baez
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Lowe
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
5.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
W. Perez
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
16.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.56
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
16.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
16.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Stewart
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.65
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
14.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.35
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
13.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.04%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Keith
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
12.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.46
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
12.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. McLain
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.23
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
12.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
8.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Baez
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
6.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Lowe
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.84%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
CIN
+1.5 spread
0.08
PROJECTION
-1.4
DIFFERENCE
1.7%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.89%
EV
TOTAL HITS
W. Perez
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
1.66%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Lowe
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.59%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-3.13%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.14
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-3.79%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Baez
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.82%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.63%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Stewart
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-4.7%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Keith
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.81%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.34%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. McLain
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.96%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-7.39%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-7.47%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-7.94%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
2.07
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
17.64%
EV
TOTAL BASES
W. Perez
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
17.46%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Carpenter
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
17.2%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Stewart
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
15.6%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
15.58%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.69%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
12.34%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.3%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. McLain
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.00
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
9.04%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Lowe
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.2%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.47%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Baez
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.90
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-29.41%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Keith
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.93
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-29.72%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
0.90
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
2.35%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.24%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. McLain
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.6%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.94%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.57%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Stewart
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.66%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Keith
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.13%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Baez
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.85%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-13.89%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Lowe
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-17.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-17.47%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
K. Montero
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.33%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. McLain
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.98%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
W. Perez
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
15.84%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.46%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.44%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.16%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Stewart
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.87%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.85%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.56%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Keith
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.01%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.24%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.53%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.48%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Baez
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.08%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Lowe
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
5.21%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
W. Perez
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
16.46%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Greene
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.56
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
16.37%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Carpenter
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
16.14%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Stewart
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.65
PROJECTION
+1.1
DIFFERENCE
14.52%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. McGonigle
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.35
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
13.34%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Stephenson
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.27%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Torkelson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.04%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Keith
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
12.82%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. De La Cruz
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.46
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
12.69%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. McLain
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.23
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
12.08%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Dingler
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
8.95%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Baez
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
6.56%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Friedl
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.07%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Lowe
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.84%
EV
DET vs CIN Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for this matchup