Any rightwinger that's over the top is accused by the lefties of being APK.
there are plenty of us here with gripes about the way the mods decided to knowingly let APK, an alias of 69Mets free to post, when other posters get banned for far less confrontational incidents, and are insta-banned when they re-up with an alias
APK is/was 69 Mets, i would bet my left eye, and i would bet my right nut that any mod that pays any attention here KNEW IT ALL ALONG
JerryRice is/was himike, and i'd bet soon enough he'll find his way to the penalty box
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
Any rightwinger that's over the top is accused by the lefties of being APK.
there are plenty of us here with gripes about the way the mods decided to knowingly let APK, an alias of 69Mets free to post, when other posters get banned for far less confrontational incidents, and are insta-banned when they re-up with an alias
APK is/was 69 Mets, i would bet my left eye, and i would bet my right nut that any mod that pays any attention here KNEW IT ALL ALONG
JerryRice is/was himike, and i'd bet soon enough he'll find his way to the penalty box
APK is/was 69 Mets, i would bet my left eye, and i would bet my right nut that any mod that pays any attention here KNEW IT ALL ALONG
It was always possible, but it we banned every single poster that we thought or another poster thought was an alias, without absolute evidence, there would be tumbleweeds bouncing through the forums.
0
Quote Originally Posted by be easy:
APK is/was 69 Mets, i would bet my left eye, and i would bet my right nut that any mod that pays any attention here KNEW IT ALL ALONG
It was always possible, but it we banned every single poster that we thought or another poster thought was an alias, without absolute evidence, there would be tumbleweeds bouncing through the forums.
No Covers member,outside being a tout and having more than one tagline ..should be banned ..
The guidlines in the Manifesto are really subjective standards...
When a member does something that's ruled by the Moderators to be over the line -e.g. stalking,threats,banned words. . etc..they should be boxed, but not banned...(boxed for as long as it takes for them to show reform)..No Reform ..life sentence... Not the "death penalty"..
This would eliminate most of the SAF's who are probably the greater % of the one causing mayhem in the Forums......
That way everyone would know by their unchanged tagline who's saying what .....because of that.. having more than one tagline would alway's constitute a banning ....
Too many really great personalities, that have help make this site so unique have been lost due to banning.. imho
0
No Covers member,outside being a tout and having more than one tagline ..should be banned ..
The guidlines in the Manifesto are really subjective standards...
When a member does something that's ruled by the Moderators to be over the line -e.g. stalking,threats,banned words. . etc..they should be boxed, but not banned...(boxed for as long as it takes for them to show reform)..No Reform ..life sentence... Not the "death penalty"..
This would eliminate most of the SAF's who are probably the greater % of the one causing mayhem in the Forums......
That way everyone would know by their unchanged tagline who's saying what .....because of that.. having more than one tagline would alway's constitute a banning ....
Too many really great personalities, that have help make this site so unique have been lost due to banning.. imho
Hot Forum Topics
