Posted:
#51
If it works for you, so be it...lol....sort of like buying bread @ the highest price but you at least will eat, if you can afford it. 
0
YANKEES+1.5(-455)
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:
Do you have a printer, lovethedough?
OK. If so, then please print out this post. Carry this paper with you at all times, and constantly read it.
By then, hopefully by only the 2nd time you read it, you'll realize what you just had said. 
....
that was friggin hilarious....he probably has a post it on his back saying " Kick Me"...
that was friggin hilarious....he probably has a post it on his back saying " Kick Me"...0
Posted:
#53
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:
I understand bunny. Do you understand, you don't have to pay juice when you win? So....juice is just imaginary to me, until I lose. And if I do lose? I would put at least 200 on my next game....and when that game wins....guess what...i'm 1-1 and only down 70 bucks !!!
I understand bunny. Do you understand, you don't have to pay juice when you win? So....juice is just imaginary to me, until I lose. And if I do lose? I would put at least 200 on my next game....and when that game wins....guess what...i'm 1-1 and only down 70 bucks !!!
The flaw in your "logic" is that if you bet $200 next game, you'll most likely pick another game where you're paying -400 or so - because "it's not juice if you win". So you lose $260 tonight - then you bet $200 next game, even if you win - you're still down around $200.
As for followers, anyone who would follow someone who plays terrible lines is a fool. And for the record, playing MLB games with this much juice is a guaranteed way to go straight to the poorhouse. Do not pass go, do NOT collect $200.
(of course, you'll lie and say you're up thousands this year playing these ridiculous lines - so since we're playing that game, excuse me, I have to go, Olivia Wilde just rang my doorbell and she's only wearing high heels - since we're both living in fantasy land, at least my fantasy is ... interesting)
0
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder:
Chances of them losing by more than a run are slim to none
Chances of them losing by more than a run are slim to none
He likes taking free monies
No free $$$ in this business 
I had Yanks +1.5 last night and they were down 0-6 in the bottom of the 8th. Somehow by some miracle, they scored 5 runs and the whole thing ended 5-6 so Yanks +1.5 cashed. But I almost 
my PC before the end.
my PC before the end. NO FREE MONEY for us in this betting world.
0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:
Raems-----instead of coming up with your weird theories, bet the game and make some money !!! Stop losing....you have a gambling problem. If you listened to me...you would not have lost a single pick since JULY 15
July 15-w/o a loss? That is effen bad ass! How come the avatar person is not happier with that kind of winning.
Raems-----instead of coming up with your weird theories, bet the game and make some money !!! Stop losing....you have a gambling problem. If you listened to me...you would not have lost a single pick since JULY 15
0
Posted:
#59
I also followed a link from another thread.
From everything I have learned sports gambling over the last decade, the idea of laying over 4-1 on ANY wager is so ridiculous I can only assume this thread is a joke.
If it's not, you should really try back testing, or at least playing with imaginary money for a season.
Although, in all fairness - we always support people who play crazy 20-1 parlays, why not the guy who lays crazy 4-1 chalk?
0
Posted:
#64
Quote Originally Posted by jshep:
Kaponofor3 or madshooter... i've never played RRLs before but since i've seen a few people mentioning it on here before... could you give me a quick explanation of what exactly it is? preciate it
Kaponofor3 or madshooter... i've never played RRLs before but since i've seen a few people mentioning it on here before... could you give me a quick explanation of what exactly it is? preciate it
RRL is reverse run line. Normally the RL for the favorite is -1.5 for some amount of plus juice, or maybe even negative juice if the favorite is laying heavy chalk. The RRL is the opposite -- you take the DOG in the game and lay -1.5 runs. You should usually be able to get +200 or better on any dog on these plays.
0
Posted:
#67
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:
I understand bunny. Do you understand, you don't have to pay juice when you win? So....juice is just imaginary to me, until I lose. And if I do lose? I would put at least 200 on my next game....and when that game wins....guess what...i'm 1-1 and only down 70 bucks !!!
I understand bunny. Do you understand, you don't have to pay juice when you win? So....juice is just imaginary to me, until I lose. And if I do lose? I would put at least 200 on my next game....and when that game wins....guess what...i'm 1-1 and only down 70 bucks !!!
mm down 70 bucks??? wouldnt your "secure" plays be laying -450 ??
so it would be something like this:
bet 1 = -270 (lose bet 270 to win 60)
bet 2 = +45 (win bet 200 to win 45)
total = (-270) + 45 = -225
0
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:
Do you have a printer, lovethedough?
OK. If so, then please print out this post. Carry this paper with you at all times, and constantly read it.
By then, hopefully by only the 2nd time you read it, you'll realize what you just had said.
this joke poster still gets attention. Oh well......I guess that is him in his picture though...so there's only one thing left to say...
Sup bro?
0
Hot Forum Topics
