All Forums | The Archives

YANKEES+1.5(-455)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 58871
Posts: 350
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4471
Posted: #1

I have now won 10 Straight games......Let's make it 11 in a row tonight !!!

 

As hard a spot in this game for the A's as they will see this season.  Shocked this line is so small.  I know Las Vegas plays by the book... but if they made this line -900, people would jump on the A's-1.5....and they would clean up !!!

 

Give me the Yankees+1.5 tonight......

Risking 273 to make $60.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 2131
Posted: #2
why on earth would you lay -455 juice??  just a matter of time before you lose it all
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #3
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4471
Posted: #4

Quote Originally Posted by redsox5831:

why on earth would you lay -455 juice??  just a matter of time before you lose it all

 

I will NEVER lose it all

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 8135
Posted: #5
wtf 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 68073
Posted: #6
oh dear
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 2275
Posted: #7
he "lovethedough" anf the juice
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #8
The Yankees are -250 on the ML. You would rather pay 200 cents of juice to get the home team +1.5. (which is usually worthless)

Makes sense to me.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4471
Posted: #9

Quote Originally Posted by Badboyz8:

he "lovethedough" anf the juice

I do lovethejuice....I should change my name.

I would rather risk 273 to make 60 and win...than risk 72 to make 60 and lose the 72.   We are talking about a 132 dollar difference.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 249
Posted: #10
You've gone full retard.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #11
I opened this thread from another person's link fully expecting it to be another poster (hi GiGi!) laying this kind of juice -- glad to see there's more than one of you guys out there.


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:

I do lovethejuice....I should change my name.

I would rather risk 273 to make 60 and win...than risk 72 to make 60 and lose the 72.   We are talking about a 132 dollar difference.


Do you have a printer, lovethedough?


OK.  If so, then please print out this post.  Carry this paper with you at all times, and constantly read it.


By then, hopefully by only the 2nd time you read it, you'll realize what you just had said.   

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 6433
Posted: #13

Quote Originally Posted by sonicboom2532:

You've gone full retard.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #14
Chances of them losing by more than a run are slim to none

He likes taking free monies
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 7138
Posted: #15

Charlie fuckin Sheen

WINNING!!!!

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4471
Posted: #16

Gilmo....I meant if I was laying 120 on a game.

 

10 IN A ROW !!!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 5882
Posted: #17
hey can i be your new bookie please?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4471
Posted: #18

Quote Originally Posted by ogkush:

hey can i be your new bookie please?

 

No....I have a bookie that sends me a check every month....sorry.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:

Gilmo....I meant if I was laying 120 on a game.

 

10 IN A ROW !!!



You completely missed his point.

10 in a row is nothing more than an aberration in the data -- keep thinking that means you are the man


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 8810
Posted: #20
fuck the idiots good luck  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1297
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by sonicboom2532:

You've gone full retard.


hahahahahaha!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 3550
Posted: #22
bad bet with Cahill on the mound
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 16332
Posted: #23
U love juice
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2879
Posted: #24
the joke is on the forum, not on ilovethedough. it's literally not possible that all of these bets are real, this is nothing more than an attention grab. hope you're enjoy it.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1297
Posted: #25
I swear in my entire life, this is the dumbest full retard play (as Sonic said) 

The risk reward is so bad, I think you may be pulling our chain.  You didn't really bet this did you lol

LovetheDough I LIVE AND DIE  for the YANKEES, BEST OF LUCK BUDDY.  You are better off betting Yanks RL, they win by >1.5 over 80% of the time and your downside is only 1 unit. Why risk 4.5 to win .6.  Come on man!!!
All Forums | The Archives
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.