Posted:
#1
Good evening, everyone. Time to get to get to work. 
Linda Noskova ML +110
5
UAE
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:
Good evening, everyone. Time to get to get to work. Linda Noskova ML +110
Good evening, everyone. Time to get to get to work. Linda Noskova ML +110
CASH IT Uman, JoseAlonso787, Starnes, TIPOF-THE-SWORD, and Buzz44 
2
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by bringit:
Some notable losses so far: Anisimova (Doha Champ) Sabalenka (Wuhan Champ) Gauff (Beijing Champ) Zheng (Beijing runner-up) Notice anything??
Some notable losses so far: Anisimova (Doha Champ) Sabalenka (Wuhan Champ) Gauff (Beijing Champ) Zheng (Beijing runner-up) Notice anything??
From the WTA rulebook:
"WTA Singles Ranking is determined by calculating her total ranking points.....which must include:
· four (4) Grand Slams;
· six (6) WTA 1000 Mandatory combined/virtually combined Tournaments;
· one (1) WTA 1000 Mandatory Tournament (WTA only);"
So top 6 results are included from ATP/WTA combined tournaments. There are 2 combined tournaments next month with the Sunshine Double. I wonder if Sabs and Gauff were thinking about their upcoming return to North America during their Middle East vacation.
Top 1 result from WTA only tournaments. Sabs and Gauff already have titles for this requirement while Zheng has a respectable runner-up finish.
Iga and Ryba skipped China last year so they're sitting on a SF and QF, respectively, in Doha as their best result. The next opportunity (after Dubai) to improve on this result won't come until Beijing.
Seems like a title in Dubai could be especially important for 2ga so that she can match Aryna's title in Wuhan. And with Sabs now having only one GS Title counting towards her ranking, 2ga could be eyeing for a return to 1ga sometime before the end of grass season. Her PR team desperately needs it so they can roll the logo back out.
1
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:
Quote Originally Posted by bringit: @wgomel21 Do you think Iga -250 (implied win probability 71%) is an accurate line? (Unrelated to other question) Thinking if we can get Andreeva at +4.5 games we go for it.
Quote Originally Posted by bringit: @wgomel21 Do you think Iga -250 (implied win probability 71%) is an accurate line? (Unrelated to other question) Thinking if we can get Andreeva at +4.5 games we go for it.
Well their last matchup was close, but that was during her little post-olympic crisis. Same tournament where she dropped a set against Gracheva after leading it 5-2.
1
Posted:
#24
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:
Quote Originally Posted by bringit: @wgomel21 Do you think Iga -250 (implied win probability 71%) is an accurate line? (Unrelated to other question) Thinking if we can get Andreeva at +4.5 games we go for it.
Quote Originally Posted by bringit: @wgomel21 Do you think Iga -250 (implied win probability 71%) is an accurate line? (Unrelated to other question) Thinking if we can get Andreeva at +4.5 games we go for it.
Andreeva is putting major pressure on Iga. 
1
Hot Forum Topics
