Quote Originally Posted by teslaxyz: @wgomel21 I got over 18.5 +130 on live bet, but they retired. Vegas know what to do. If my team is losing they never retired. With that being said, Vegas is cheating. This match would have gone under if Pliskova continued. Count your blessings.
No doubt, Pliskova was struggling entire match. Her serve is her greatest asset and could not hold.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jvarghese:
Quote Originally Posted by teslaxyz: @wgomel21 I got over 18.5 +130 on live bet, but they retired. Vegas know what to do. If my team is losing they never retired. With that being said, Vegas is cheating. This match would have gone under if Pliskova continued. Count your blessings.
No doubt, Pliskova was struggling entire match. Her serve is her greatest asset and could not hold.
Vegas has close to no relevance in the grand scope of things - especially not within tennis betting - the Asian gambling market dwarfens the American market to such an extent you can basically not compare them (if you include their illegal market) ! - even the European market is bigger than the American market
And the Asian market is bigger than both of those combined
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Vegas has close to no relevance in the grand scope of things - especially not within tennis betting - the Asian gambling market dwarfens the American market to such an extent you can basically not compare them (if you include their illegal market) ! - even the European market is bigger than the American market
And the Asian market is bigger than both of those combined
Most Americans gamble with entities that have little to no connection to Las Vegas, NV and we are fully aware of this fact. In this context "Vegas" is commonly used not to describe the actual city but instead as a broader slang term referencing perceived dark underbellies of the gambling world, regardless of location.
6
Most Americans gamble with entities that have little to no connection to Las Vegas, NV and we are fully aware of this fact. In this context "Vegas" is commonly used not to describe the actual city but instead as a broader slang term referencing perceived dark underbellies of the gambling world, regardless of location.
True that. When I mentioned Vegas, it means general gambling sites. I've seen certain sports at -100,000 on certain sites, in the end that -100,000 favored lost. I tought I've seen it all. But there's more to it. Anything is POSSIBLE!!!!!!!
It’s not easy to be a man. Building a life you love is hard.
0
@bringit
True that. When I mentioned Vegas, it means general gambling sites. I've seen certain sports at -100,000 on certain sites, in the end that -100,000 favored lost. I tought I've seen it all. But there's more to it. Anything is POSSIBLE!!!!!!!
Poppy's break conversion is a dreadful 31% and his double fault percentage is 3%....FAA is averaging 10 aces per match thus far and his double fault rate is 2%...his first serve percentage is 73% and his current record against lower ranked opponents is solid...
FAA is in good form...the fact that FAA has lost twice to poppy (Rome and Adelaide) is a non issue for me given that it was back in 2023...both are not the same players from back then...FAA -3.5 for me
Good luck gents
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Poppy's break conversion is a dreadful 31% and his double fault percentage is 3%....FAA is averaging 10 aces per match thus far and his double fault rate is 2%...his first serve percentage is 73% and his current record against lower ranked opponents is solid...
FAA is in good form...the fact that FAA has lost twice to poppy (Rome and Adelaide) is a non issue for me given that it was back in 2023...both are not the same players from back then...FAA -3.5 for me
@ABooksNightmare Have you followed FAA over the past few years? Buyer beware. Anything can happen. Bol.
Yes, I have followed FAA and tennis closely, and yes, FAA does choke quite often, but so does the rest of the players....on any given day anyone can be beat, but FAA looks in good form right now and I cannot see him losing to Poppy...can FAA cover the 3.5, well, that is yet to be determined, but I can certainly see a 6-4 6-4 final...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Quote Originally Posted by jvarghese:
@ABooksNightmare Have you followed FAA over the past few years? Buyer beware. Anything can happen. Bol.
Yes, I have followed FAA and tennis closely, and yes, FAA does choke quite often, but so does the rest of the players....on any given day anyone can be beat, but FAA looks in good form right now and I cannot see him losing to Poppy...can FAA cover the 3.5, well, that is yet to be determined, but I can certainly see a 6-4 6-4 final...
Felix was killing it last week while Poppy hasn't won since USO. Coming off of a title would make it a no bet for me but understandable if it's a player you follow and feel comfortable with.
0
@ABooksNightmare
Good info.
Felix was killing it last week while Poppy hasn't won since USO. Coming off of a title would make it a no bet for me but understandable if it's a player you follow and feel comfortable with.
Poppy's break conversion is a dreadful 31% and his double fault percentage is 3%....FAA is averaging 10 aces per match thus far and his double fault rate is 2%...his first serve percentage is 73% and his current record against lower ranked opponents is solid... FAA is in good form...the fact that FAA has lost twice to poppy (Rome and Adelaide) is a non issue for me given that it was back in 2023...both are not the same players from back then...FAA -3.5 for me Good luck gents
Nice call
0
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
Poppy's break conversion is a dreadful 31% and his double fault percentage is 3%....FAA is averaging 10 aces per match thus far and his double fault rate is 2%...his first serve percentage is 73% and his current record against lower ranked opponents is solid... FAA is in good form...the fact that FAA has lost twice to poppy (Rome and Adelaide) is a non issue for me given that it was back in 2023...both are not the same players from back then...FAA -3.5 for me Good luck gents
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Poppy's break conversion is a dreadful 31% and his double fault percentage is 3%....FAA is averaging 10 aces per match thus far and his double fault rate is 2%...his first serve percentage is 73% and his current record against lower ranked opponents is solid... FAA is in good form...the fact that FAA has lost twice to poppy (Rome and Adelaide) is a non issue for me given that it was back in 2023...both are not the same players from back then...FAA -3.5 for me Good luck gents Nice call
Indeed
0
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Poppy's break conversion is a dreadful 31% and his double fault percentage is 3%....FAA is averaging 10 aces per match thus far and his double fault rate is 2%...his first serve percentage is 73% and his current record against lower ranked opponents is solid... FAA is in good form...the fact that FAA has lost twice to poppy (Rome and Adelaide) is a non issue for me given that it was back in 2023...both are not the same players from back then...FAA -3.5 for me Good luck gents Nice call
I check your threads daily to see what you guys are on...both of you are top notch in here...FAA did just enough to turn my 2 cents into 4..on to the next
@jvarghese
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
1
@wgomel21
@bringit
I check your threads daily to see what you guys are on...both of you are top notch in here...FAA did just enough to turn my 2 cents into 4..on to the next
@wgomel21 @bringit I check your threads daily to see what you guys are on...both of you are top notch in here...FAA did just enough to turn my 2 cents into 4..on to the next @jvarghese
You should post more plays
2
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
@wgomel21 @bringit I check your threads daily to see what you guys are on...both of you are top notch in here...FAA did just enough to turn my 2 cents into 4..on to the next @jvarghese
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: @wgomel21 @bringit I check your threads daily to see what you guys are on...both of you are top notch in here...FAA did just enough to turn my 2 cents into 4..on to the next @jvarghese You should post more plays
Here he goes again asking others to post plays again for him.
Varkeyboy, we have told you for years that YOU need to post plays. But you don’t. Too afraid of us fading you, which goes to show you do not care about this forum. Only yourself.
2
Quote Originally Posted by jvarghese:
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: @wgomel21 @bringit I check your threads daily to see what you guys are on...both of you are top notch in here...FAA did just enough to turn my 2 cents into 4..on to the next @jvarghese You should post more plays
Here he goes again asking others to post plays again for him.
Varkeyboy, we have told you for years that YOU need to post plays. But you don’t. Too afraid of us fading you, which goes to show you do not care about this forum. Only yourself.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.