Posted:
#151
Can't wait to hit a parlay with you. I could use a nice hit Sentinel
0
My tennis strategy THE ZONE.
Posted:
#152
Quote Originally Posted by p1edp1pper:
Hey Brother, i signed up to the forum just to say thank you for the picks. I have been following them for a while and never said thank you. So thank you, keep up the good work.
Hey Brother, i signed up to the forum just to say thank you for the picks. I have been following them for a while and never said thank you. So thank you, keep up the good work.
play every fav between -140 and -200
that 100% of the plays bud
no need to scratch ur head on this one
70% win rate and 1 play away from being down units
1 dimensional player
0
Posted:
#153
u tell the guy that bet 2k and lost never to bet so much on one game
Calling in a 2 unit play (100$ per unit) for 200$ and the next play is 20 unit (2k) is a sure disaster
anyone can be in the zone with all fav (ask bubbles Mikeru) he has been hitting those numbers and been getting baked in the long run
I say to u, be more constant with ur playing units and picks some dogs!!
unless , u ll be just a memory
0
Posted:
#154
Quote Originally Posted by examine:
Examine lets wait and see. 1.40 to 1.80 actually isn't all the favourites. Theres only one number you need to keep focused on.u tell the guy that bet 2k and lost never to bet so much on one game
Calling in a 2 unit play (100$ per unit) for 200$ and the next play is 20 unit (2k) is a sure disaster
anyone can be in the zone with all fav (ask bubbles Mikeru) he has been hitting those numbers and been getting baked in the long run
I say to u, be more constant with ur playing units and picks some dogs!!
unless , u ll be just a memory
65.40% as long as I stay above that LONGTERM. I make a profit LONGTERM. But that's not even the whole ball game. The real power of the zone isn't staying above that number. It's the flow of winning streaks and short losing streaks that makes it powerful.
There's plenty of back to back winners, trebles and beyond with this strategy. You could simply play it for parlays and clean up. I've had 37trebles this year. 6 of them came from that 18 match winning streak. Before that there were streaks of 9 matches and 7 matches.
That's where THERE REAL MONEY and POWER of this strategy lies. I'm using straight bets on here to proof the method and show it can stand up long term like that. But I make my REAL money from parlays. Lets be straight about that.
0
Posted:
#156
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:
You are on fire mate keep up the good work. Any plays for later. ?
Hi Enjoi and thanks. Not right now. I will have a look and have another pick up around 5pm GMT UK time.You are on fire mate keep up the good work. Any plays for later. ?
Byravikova won her match easily, giving me my 38th parlay treble of the year, so I'm happy about that. And my first streak beyond two since that monster streak of 18 last week. Lets see if we can get to four later.
0
Posted:
#158
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:
Sweet. Can't wait.
How long you been being tennis? Is this your bread and butter?
Ive been running this strategy since 2008. Going on 6.5 years now and it's never let me down. Parlays of two to three are my bread and butter. I'm not really a straight bettor.Sweet. Can't wait.
How long you been being tennis? Is this your bread and butter?
And only do it for the exercise of showing this strategy is one of the best. I realised withing a few months of running this strategy, that it was winning back to back and beyond so often. It was a dream for rolling parlays. So that's what I started doing. So-called experts say never bet parlays. But that's in the sense of trying to pick two or more winning bets at the same time.
When you have a strategy like the ZONE that produces so many doubles, trebles and beyond. It's a no brainer where the real profits going to come from. Two or three favourites together is like betting on a dog. The difference is you will hit more often with the zone.
0
Posted:
#159
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
Examine lets wait and see. 1.40 to 1.80 actually isn't all the favourites. Theres only one number you need to keep focused on.
Examine lets wait and see. 1.40 to 1.80 actually isn't all the favourites. Theres only one number you need to keep focused on.
65.40% as long as I stay above that LONGTERM. I make a profit LONGTERM. But that's not even the whole ball game. The real power of the zone isn't staying above that number. It's the flow of winning streaks and short losing streaks that makes it powerful.
There's plenty of back to back winners, trebles and beyond with this strategy. You could simply play it for parlays and clean up. I've had 37trebles this year. 6 of them came from that 18 match winning streak. Before that there were streaks of 9 matches and 7 matches.
That's where THERE REAL MONEY and POWER of this strategy lies. I'm using straight bets on here to proof the method and show it can stand up long term like that. But I make my REAL money from parlays. Lets be straight about that.
Thx for the explanation
Parleys are good for those bets, I agree.
That changes the WHOLE math behind ur the music
My book (local) does not allow tennis parleys 
if not I would play them...
Ur units are most probably far better then show here then
good work 
0
Posted:
#160
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
Ive been running this strategy since 2008. Going on 6.5 years now and it's never let me down. Parlays of two to three are my bread and butter. I'm not really a straight bettor.
Ive been running this strategy since 2008. Going on 6.5 years now and it's never let me down. Parlays of two to three are my bread and butter. I'm not really a straight bettor.
And only do it for the exercise of showing this strategy is one of the best. I realised withing a few months of running this strategy, that it was winning back to back and beyond so often. It was a dream for rolling parlays. So that's what I started doing. So-called experts say never bet parlays. But that's in the sense of trying to pick two or more winning bets at the same time.
When you have a strategy like the ZONE that produces so many doubles, trebles and beyond. It's a no brainer where the real profits going to come from. Two or three favourites together is like betting on a dog. The difference is you will hit more often with the zone.
if you been winning for 6 years straight in Tennis then ur definitely a pleasant anomaly ...
I would consider UPPING ur wagers to 100-500$ a unit at this point (if ur not betting that already)
but tell me, why jump from 2 to 5 to 10 to 10 units and go back and forth within those rages?
would it be easier to keep the same wager ?
0
Posted:
#161
Quote Originally Posted by examine:
if you been winning for 6 years straight in Tennis then ur definitely a pleasant anomaly ...
I would consider UPPING ur wagers to 100-500$ a unit at this point (if ur not betting that already)
but tell me, why jump from 2 to 5 to 10 to 10 units and go back and forth within those rages?
would it be easier to keep the same wager ?
I actually believe this guy, which is a rarity on this site. Show me another guy who has gone 16 straight wins this year documented?
This guy is something else
0
Posted:
#162
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:
Actually my streaks are 7~~9~~18 since I started posting. The last one was a freak run dont expect that every week lol.
I actually believe this guy, which is a rarity on this site. Show me another guy who has gone 16 straight wins this year documented?
This guy is something else
0
Posted:
#163
Quote Originally Posted by examine:
Yes and no Examine, I dont like straight bets and I dont like losing. I also know the zone doesnt go beyond 4 loses in a row often. Thats why I raise. Upping stakes is hard if you want to go undetectedif you been winning for 6 years straight in Tennis then ur definitely a pleasant anomaly ...
I would consider UPPING ur wagers to 100-500$ a unit at this point (if ur not betting that already)
but tell me, why jump from 2 to 5 to 10 to 10 units and go back and forth within those rages?
would it be easier to keep the same wager ?
Greed is a killer, with what I Know I should be a millionaire. But im very cautious.
0
Posted:
#164
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:
Yes and no Examine, I dont like straight bets and I dont like losing. I also know the zone doesnt go beyond 4 loses in a row often. Thats why I raise. Upping stakes is hard if you want to go undetected
Yes and no Examine, I dont like straight bets and I dont like losing. I also know the zone doesnt go beyond 4 loses in a row often. Thats why I raise. Upping stakes is hard if you want to go undetected
Greed is a killer, with what I Know I should be a millionaire. But im very cautious.
So it's basically Martingale but you've never lost 4 in a row. What are the unit sizes for each chase?
0
Posted:
#165
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:
NOT classic martingale.This is how I would stake three losses. 1~1~2. Then 4 units on the 4th bet.So it's basically Martingale but you've never lost 4 in a row. What are the unit sizes for each chase?
In over 8000 bets ive lost more than 4 times just 7 times. The longest ever being 6. I think that is pretty excellent. When you consider sports handicappers sell worse losing streaks.
0
Posted:
#170
Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.
You started this so called system making 20-40-60-100-120 unit wagers...and now are doing 1-3 and 5. Comes across as you are either clueless or were just trying to build a fake bankroll to make your units record look better.
Add some of the Safs in the thread and is little doubt in my mind that you are looking for customers... good luck gathering them. If somebody is dumb enough to believe this garbage they deserve to go broke.
0
Posted:
#171
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.
Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.
You started this so called system making 20-40-60-100-120 unit wagers...and now are doing 1-3 and 5. Comes across as you are either clueless or were just trying to build a fake bankroll to make your units record look better.
Add some of the Safs in the thread and is little doubt in my mind that you are looking for customers... good luck gathering them. If somebody is dumb enough to believe this garbage they deserve to go broke.
Why the hell he should do that because ur sceptic. And why u need this be proven system? Why u care at all?
0
Posted:
#172
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.
Can anyone fake a 75% strikerate and winning streaks in excess of 6 several times.Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.
You started this so called system making 20-40-60-100-120 unit wagers...and now are doing 1-3 and 5. Comes across as you are either clueless or were just trying to build a fake bankroll to make your units record look better.
Add some of the Safs in the thread and is little doubt in my mind that you are looking for customers... good luck gathering them. If somebody is dumb enough to believe this garbage they deserve to go broke.
Save your bitterness Mr, this strategy will be on here for free for years to come. What I'm waiting for is that light bulb moment from you. When you realise you were wrong. And we will then see if you have the decency to apologise. Now that will be a moment.
0
Hot Forum Topics
