Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by DogHouse:
Peng handled her business
Yes she's looking like a contender for the final.
Peng handled her business
0
My tennis strategy THE ZONE.
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by n3gative:
I do not understand your system at all, why don't you just keep consistent units for plays?
ranging from 5 units to 100 seems unnecessary and pointless. You're going from less then 1% on some plays to 10% on others.
GL with it I guess
luck is not in this equation. Sports bettors overall make hard work of the easiest way to win. The point of the jumps in units was to pull back a poor start. Since I began on the forum. From a bad U.S open start.I do not understand your system at all, why don't you just keep consistent units for plays?
ranging from 5 units to 100 seems unnecessary and pointless. You're going from less then 1% on some plays to 10% on others.
GL with it I guess
Now that I'm in the black my stakes will be TWO LEVELS. So long as I don't lose three in a row. The strength of staying off the big names most of the time in tennis is less will go wrong.
Numbers rule ALL gambling. The first thing any gambler with any aspirations of being a LONGTERM success must do is understand everything get its turn. Outsiders are going to win their share in the big tournaments. Most bettors get too emotional, to involved with the players. That's the biggest mistake you can make.
Be concerned about the numbers. And there's no mystery to being a success.
0
Posted:
#42
You are betting a system that 99% of bettors on this site cannot do. Most do not have multiple accounts or have numerous public bookies to get the appropriate action on ITF/Challenger events to make it worth while. This is the equivalent of someone who posts a line 2 points below the public line and claims it's from a local.
0
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
You are betting a system that 99% of bettors on this site cannot do. Most do not have multiple accounts or have numerous public bookies to get the appropriate action on ITF/Challenger events to make it worth while. This is the equivalent of someone who posts a line 2 points below the public line and claims it's from a local.
Why can't they do it? It just takes a bit more effort.
You are betting a system that 99% of bettors on this site cannot do. Most do not have multiple accounts or have numerous public bookies to get the appropriate action on ITF/Challenger events to make it worth while. This is the equivalent of someone who posts a line 2 points below the public line and claims it's from a local.
0
Posted:
#45
Most people are betting for leisure...very few are betting for a living. The amount of time and effort to setup accounts to make your system work would not work for 99.9% of Covers users. Honestly it isn't worth most professionals time either.
Challengers/ITF are very low limit bets at the few books that take them.
Also N3 maes a good point ... not sure how you are betting 5 units on a wager and 100 on another. If your system is what you say you would be better off flat betting
0
Posted:
#46
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
Most people are betting for leisure...very few are betting for a living. The amount of time and effort to setup accounts to make your system work would not work for 99.9% of Covers users. Honestly it isn't worth most professionals time either.
Tell me how you know 99.9% of people couldn't make this work. Everything in life takes some effort to be truly successful even gambling. In fact it takes a lot more. That's why most don't even have a shot of being successful LONGTERM. They aren't prepared to go the extra mile.Most people are betting for leisure...very few are betting for a living. The amount of time and effort to setup accounts to make your system work would not work for 99.9% of Covers users. Honestly it isn't worth most professionals time either.
Challengers/ITF are very low limit bets at the few books that take them.
Also N3 maes a good point ... not sure how you are betting 5 units on a wager and 100 on another. If your system is what you say you would be better off flat betting
Now educate me, fill me in on your circumstances. I am assuming you are American? Can only bet in Vegas, Atlantic city and few other places. Maybe some offshore online accounts. So you live in the land of the free but can't bet when and where you like? Makes no sense to me. You speak of limits, what are the limits on tennis stateside then?
Staking? The whole thing about raising and lowering stakes is CONFIDENCE. Knowing you have one of the greatest betting systems of alltime for one reason, and one reason only. SHORT LOSING STREAKS.
The thing that all gamblers fear is the unknown. But if you knew that you will rarely lose more than 4 times in a row. You start to fear little. No one has ever shown me a system that is stronger in that department. And I doubt they ever will. People pay thousands for picks for baseball and the rest. And still get stung by horrendous bankroll destroying losing streaks.
The passage of time will show many here that emigration or long vacations in the UK might be a good idea. Given you have the freedom to make some serious coin. Without having to have the ridiculous laws against you. That you have stateside.
0
Posted:
#47
You keep mentioning system...please explain what your system is... because right now it looks like someone randomly picking -200 lines.... and when they lose you martingale to try and make up the difference.
You also clearly don't understand people very well. Setting up multiple accounts at multiple books and then managing them all and getting appropriate action is not something that many are going to do in order to follow some random ahole on Covers.
Actually if you had confidence you would flat bet. You are claiming to be 12% above break even point. Meaning over the 8000 wagers you claim would put you around 960 units up if you flat wagered. Meaning a $100 bettor would be up almost $100,000 and a $1,000 bettor would be up almost a million.
Personally I think you are 100% full of sh*t. If you did have a system that was ultra successful you wouldn't be sharing it for free on Covers. I suspect you are just another tout wannabe using monopoly wagers in hopes of gathering a following. Have seen it about a million times on this site through the years.
0
Posted:
#48
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
You keep mentioning system...please explain what your system is... because right now it looks like someone randomly picking -200 lines.... and when they lose you martingale to try and make up the difference.
THE ZONE is simple, You have a floor bet of 1.40 and a ceiling bet of 1.80. Under no circumstances do you bet outside of that zone. You can think what you like. The numbers will give you the reality check as time moves forward. You think anyone selling a system has anything better than what I'm laying here for zilch. Because I can tell you with absolute certainty you will never see anything like this ever.You keep mentioning system...please explain what your system is... because right now it looks like someone randomly picking -200 lines.... and when they lose you martingale to try and make up the difference.
You also clearly don't understand people very well. Setting up multiple accounts at multiple books and then managing them all and getting appropriate action is not something that many are going to do in order to follow some random ahole on Covers.
Actually if you had confidence you would flat bet. You are claiming to be 12% above break even point. Meaning over the 8000 wagers you claim would put you around 960 units up if you flat wagered. Meaning a $100 bettor would be up almost $100,000 and a $1,000 bettor would be up almost a million.
Personally I think you are 100% full of sh*t. If you did have a system that was ultra successful you wouldn't be sharing it for free on Covers. I suspect you are just another tout wannabe using monopoly wagers in hopes of gathering a following. Have seen it about a million times on this site through the years.
Worry not how often a system wins. WORRY HOW OFTEN IT LOSES. Thats where the zone leaves everything I've ever seen for dead. Yes I'm claiming those numbers but better still I'm going to prove those numbers. That's the difference between me and the rest. When you say I don't know people. I think I know them pretty well. that's exactly why I know I can put this on here and not even one in a thousand will take any notice of it. We are programmed to believe no one gives you anything good for nothing.
Now you are about to find out thats not true. A friend of mine said if you had a virtual betting grail. You could advertise it on T.V the Internet. Have it printed on the side of every car. Billboards. Leaflets through people's doors. And not even one in a thousand would even try it.
And you know what? He is right. That's why I'm laying this on here for nothing. Maybe after a year one person might realise that this is about as good as it gets. And that will be their gain.
But you are wrong and you will be proven so with the passage of time.
0
Hot Forum Topics
