Just ask yourself one question:

the first part of the message got somehow lost but it started saying that even though he asked me not to post here i had to because this board lost a 3 to 1 underdog that won in straight sets today.
 
then it continues

maybe if you guys showed a bit more respect towards him he might have posted the winner here.
i feel sorry for this guy.
everyone of us has his own style of handicapping and it should be respected no matter what. if you disagree just fade the guy or avoid him. he was trying to answer the bashers nicely at first giving explanations and offering analysis but when this became a bashing slug fest i cant blame him for what he said.
anyway i am going to let this thread die since it is his wish and will go back to observe as usual.
best of luck to the tennis forum

TennisCrapper is civilized? He goes around insulting other poster's sisters and girlfriend. Be glad he did not post today; he would have told you not to take FedEX because according to TennisCrapper Roger throws matches.

you are not talking to him, you are talking to me.
i asked you a few questions in 3 different occasions but you seem unable to answer them?

i will write them again:

1. according to the picks posted here is he winning or losing?
cos according to your posts he looks like an idiot who has no clue what he is doing and is down dozens of units, but then reading the plays it looks like the opposite to me.

2. (i will copy and paste this one)
what you seem to not understand is that those picks have nothing to do with stats. how can you possibly pick Querrey over Roddick and Kunitsyn over Blake analyzing stats? if each of us was to analyze just the stats, every single tournament would end up the way it is supposed to end up and upsets wouldnt exist!
i took a look out of curiosity on his Querrey's thread and he says that:
If Roddick isn't 100% concentrated in this match he will lose
Those clearly aren't stats but the day after this match won you created a thread praising him.
Then of course he loses Federer and this approach isnt good anymore and he needs to cap using stats.

you see the irony?


post number 57 answers your last post about Federer, he said he wasn't going to bet because he doesn't bet these tight matches and like i said in post number 60 he gave me a play on Dent who was a 3 to 1 underdog and won in straight sets, he probably was going to post here but decided not to for obvious reasons.
on another thread you say "great input TC, thank you so much", but the you tell him he is a complete idiot? it is ironic to say the least, this is why i am trying to talk to you.
i am trying to understand you as much as him so that we could all continue to enjoy insight without having to go through these stupid discussions.
you said he was from a thrid world country, etc... before he started insulting you, now how would you feel if someone said that thing to you? wouldn't you answer with some shit as well?

i think that if you guys stop being childish this forum would be a better place. you dont like him? dont post on his threads and fade him, why do you have to attack him?

i would really appreciate an answer from you patrick, let's see if we can all calm down once and for all.

@lucash & mightiestmojo

Thank you for trying to calm things up and for the kind words you had towards me. I appreciate your support.



@ Batemanpatrickl

This is seriously getting ridiculous, I mean go over this thread, I am ashamed of saying some things and if you really are a nice human being you are probably ashamed of what you said as well.

This soap opera has to end. You completely changed your behavior towards me within 36 hours when a few plays lost in a row, maybe for bad reasoning, maybe for my wrong approach towards the match, but according to me that doesn't give you the right to come here and talk shit after you praised me 1 day before.

I have not personally offended you or nobody else for that matter  (just like lucash said) until you posted that outrageous thing about Belarus, which is not even my country, and you called me a scumbag. That is when I started to attack you.

Since than you haven't been constructive at all and not even a little wise. My first post in this thread was related exclusively to the Hewitt match but you seem to accuse me of thinking that Federer throws every single match and you keep hitting on this thing, while I clearly said that I saw him doing it once in his career, last week.
Moreover, about my Berdych pick you come and say I make excuses for the loss while if you read every single article written by professional journalists regarding that match they would all say the same thing, that Nadal was the best Nadal of 2009, which according to me isn't exactly make up excuses.

I posted more winners than losers whether you admit it or not and I did so without playing one single favorite which translated into money means I am up a shitload but  you seem to just not like me and attack me no matter what. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I am asking you to please stop this, I will take back all I said to you if you are just man enough to leave me and my threads alone whether I post something that you like it or not, unless you come and criticize constructively which will be more than welcome.

This forum does not need anymore of this so I will not come on your threads anymore, even though I recall a thread by you asking information about Gonzalez vs Berdych and me giving it to you accurately with a winning pick, and I would expect the same thing from you. Can you do that?

I had a discussion with another guy as soon as I started posting again, but as you can see I don't post on his thread and he doesn't post on mine. Very simple, he is happy, I am happy and the board is happy.
I don't understand why you have to come here on my thread and say those things. Actually you did so even on other threads not even started by me! Why do you have to do that?
Have I ever bragged about a winning pick? I didn't, actually after I won on Querrey vs Roddick you were the one saying "that I could brag all I want", but I am not that kind of guy.

Celebrating after a winning pick, which is a huge underdog by the way, and go silent when losing is not a crime. What would you expect me to do exactly? Create a thread saying that I lost and that I am sad? Besides, I came here and in my Berdych thread commenting the matches while they were losing so your statement is not even entirely true.

Ah, and yes, the board today missed a +209 Underdog that won in straight sets because I only wrote the match to lucash on his playbook since he was the only one who seemed to actually appreciate my picks.
I think I know what I am doing and would like to share my picks with the forum but I can't put up with bashers as I have better things to do with my time, therefore if you guys won't come and talk shit anymore you are going to do a favor to the few users who actually enjoy reading my threads.

Not asking for much.


Now, Batemanpatrickl, let's see if you can write an essay like I did trying to justify your position where you answer a few simple questions that were asked to you and let's see if we can put this thing behind us.

I have no problem ending this but when you insult someone's girlfriend you better think long and hard about your role in the feud.

It's over as far as I am concerned. Post your plays and best of luck to you.

I have not personally offended you or nobody else for that matter  until you posted that outrageous thing about Belarus, which is not even my country, and you called me a scumbag. That is when I started to attack you. 


The fact you don't answer straight up questions means you are acknowledging that I am up a shitload.

So everything is fine, let's leave this thread follow its natural course (death) and move on.
End of the discussion.

I appreciate your wishes, best of luck to you as well.
Goodbye.