All Forums | Tennis

Just ask yourself one question:

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1866
Posts: 68
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1184
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by TennisCapper:

Besides, yesterday you were begging me to release a strong play, you forgot already?

My answer was:

It's a bad card, I am playing this only for 1% of my bankroll, yes, not even a unit.

I think you are getting too spoiled by the fact I won a few huge underdogs, well buddy if you are planning on tailing me make sure that only who has BALLS can be an underdog player because somebody can't stomach losing even 10 / 15 wagers in a row.

Clearly maybe you aren't cut to bet underdogs, since you are coming here saying these things.






Why don't you start keeping a record that includes win/losses and units.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #27
I forgot that for the Almagro match I also wagered 1 unit to win 17 units and traded the match and made sure profit there as well (exactly as I said I was going to do before the match even started).

Honestly I don't even know how to answer you, I also tried to educate the board a little giving examples of how players and odds must be analyzed together so each of us can make their own wise decisions, of how to trade in order to make sure profit and I also shared useful information I have came across while handicapping the board.

Shame on you for coming here and talk like this.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #28
As my first post stated:

I don't keep a record because I am too lazy for that (yes, all I need is my Betfair account to grow and that's it, I don't have Ego issues like most of the people here) and because 90% of my plays are adjusted in play trading and if I came here posting my trades it wouldn't be fair to consider those winnings in a record ( in 3 days I made a shitload trading Andreev vs Simon and Almagro vs Murray because I know how to do it).




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #29
Anyway, I am done answering you.

It is very easy to praise me after I win on Kunitsyn, Berdych and Querrey and attack me after I lose 3 wagers I didn't even go large on.

At least wait until my only large wager of the last 2 days on Berdych tonight loses before starting shit up. Although even if it does lose it would still be ridiculous. These guys are huge underdogs, they have a smaller chance of winning, what exactly are you looking for?

Moreover, I saw you crying across the board after Dementieva lost the first set. Dude, an advice, stop betting tennis if you get so emotional after a first set of WTA doesn't go your way. It is laughable.
You are too emotional to be betting tennis and you are not cut out for my plays, therefore my advice would be to just sit this sport out.
Again, free advice, take it or leave it.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #30
hi tenniscapper, i would like to ask you something. Can you explain to me what the change of lines means every time? Thank's foy your time!!
And i totally agree with you for berdych tonight even though i'm new on betting tennis.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #31
Hi mate

The bookmakers change the odds depending on how much money is wagered on each side.
Tonight's match is a perfect example.

Berdych opened at +289 (3.89 european odds)
A lot of money came on his side at that price and the odds dropped all the way to +230 (3.30 europeans) because the bookmakers were trying to have some money on Nadal as well.
They did a good job, because now they have had a lot of money on Nadal that brought Berdych's price all the way back to +280 (3.80 europeans).
So basically the bookmakers who are in this business to make the  juice do not like to have a lot of money on one side because if that side wins they would lose money, therefore they move the odds so that they make the side with less money wagered on more attractive for the bettors. This is in any sport by the way.
Hope this explains your question.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 173
Posted: #32
Wait. How much money has to be bet in order for the line to move? And does favorite have to be bet more in order for the line to move?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #33
Not necessarily.
Today the line moved in favor of Berdych.
This means more people were betting the Underdog.
Then when Nadal's price was cheaper, more people bet Nadal and now the odds are about the same as when they opened, that means they achieved their 50/50 on each side goal. At least I suppose so.

I am not sure how much money would need to be bet on one side before a line moves, however apart from my Betfair account I do have an account with another bookmaker and every single time I wagered the limit possible the line immediately moved a few cents, therefore I don't think it is that much. I just think they have a software that automatically moves the lines as the money comes in.
Just a guess though, I am not a bookmaker nor I have ever worked for one!


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 907
Posted: #34
on betfair 470k of 530k is on nadal, how is that 50/50.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1170
Posted: #35
hey Tasz.....never has, never will?   Wake up buddy....federer tanked here a couple years ago, i watched him, a clear tank job, sorry bud.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by dennisback:

on betfair 470k of 530k is on nadal, how is that 50/50.


On Betfair there is over 2.000.000€ matched on this match
Betfair is not a bookmaker, you are betting against other people.
I wish I was your bookie by the way-
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #37
Batemanpatrickl
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #38
Ace77






 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1184
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:

Batemanpatrickl


More losses for Tenniscapper yet he does not acknowledge them. This well thought out lean LOST. So ACE77 get your finger out of TennisCapper's anus.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by Batemanpatrickl:



More losses for Tenniscapper yet he does not acknowledge them. This well thought out lean LOST. So ACE77 get your finger out of TennisCapper's anus.


I can spot gamblers like you from a computer.
Let me tell you what kind of player you are.

You are the loser that never won at gambling since you started, who comes here trying to get some wins and coincidence was that you found me but honestly could have been anybody else.
Now here is the best part.

I posted 3 Underdogs and they all win, the day after that you beg me to release a strong play on one of your threads because you probably didn't go large and win big on the previous day.

I give you 3 plays that are not strong and on which I clearly say that are just for 1% of the bankroll, which according to every gambler is not even 1 single unit each.
But you think: "Oh TennisCapper is playing these, they will win for sure he was 3-0 hitting 2 Underdogs above +400, these plays can't lose!!!"

You go large, you lose big
You come here complaining.

Now for your happiness here are all the plays I posted here since I started this Covers Tennis Forum again:

Dubois (+200) vs Vinci - Lost

Berdych (+170) vs Gonzalez - Won

Almagro +5,5 ATS (-101, Large Play) vs Murray - Won

Andreev vs Simon - Trading Play - Won

Almagro vs Murray - Trading Play - Won

Kunitsyn (+450) vs Blake - Won

Querrey (+410, Large Play) vs Roddick - Trading play - Won

Mathieu (+380) vs Nadal - Trading Play - Won (1% of bankroll)

Razzano ATS vs Stosur - Lost (1% of bankroll)

Querrey (+119) vs Hewitt - Lost (1% of bankroll)

Hewitt (+520) vs Federer - Trading play - Lost

Berdych (+260, Large Play) vs Nadal - Lost


This record has more wins than losses (7-5) and I haven't played a single favorite, can you translate that into money?
If you can I'll buy you an ice cream.


Exactly, why are you picking on me?

I tell you why, because you went large on the plays I said you shouldn't have, you lost your money, and you started complaining like a little bitch.

You can't even answer my earlier posts because you don't know what to say, moreover I have tried to explain a few aspects of betting Tennis so each of you can make their own wise decisions but you really seem to not appreciate anything unless me hitting 75% on huge Underdogs.

The easiest thing in the world of Covers is praise the winner one day and attacking him the next day and you are very good at it.

And shame on you on attacking a Covers All-Star respected member.




 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1184
Posted: #41

Quote Originally Posted by TennisCapper:



I can spot gamblers like you from a computer.
Let me tell you what kind of player you are.

You are the loser that never won at gambling since you started, who comes here trying to get some wins and coincidence was that you found me but honestly could have been anybody else.
Now here is the best part.

I posted 3 Underdogs and they all win, the day after that you beg me to release a strong play on one of your threads because you probably didn't go large and win big on the previous day.

I give you 3 plays that are not strong and on which I clearly say that are just for 1% of the bankroll, which according to every gambler is not even 1 single unit each.
But you think: "Oh TennisCapper is playing these, they will win for sure he was 3-0 hitting 2 Underdogs above +400, these plays can't lose!!!"

You go large, you lose big
You come here complaining.

Now for your happiness here are all the plays I posted here since I started this Covers Tennis Forum again:

Dubois (+200) vs Vinci - Lost

Berdych (+170) vs Gonzalez - Won

Almagro +5,5 ATS (-101, Large Play) vs Murray - Won

Andreev vs Simon - Trading Play - Won

Almagro vs Murray - Trading Play - Won

Kunitsyn (+450) vs Blake - Won

Querrey (+410, Large Play) vs Roddick - Trading play - Won

Mathieu (+380) vs Nadal - Trading Play - Won (1% of bankroll)

Razzano ATS vs Stosur - Lost (1% of bankroll)

Querrey (+119) vs Hewitt - Lost (1% of bankroll)

Hewitt (+520) vs Federer - Trading play - Lost

Berdych (+260, Large Play) vs Nadal - Lost


This record has more wins than losses (7-5) and I haven't played a single favorite, can you translate that into money?
If you can I'll buy you an ice cream.


Exactly, why are you picking on me?

I tell you why, because you went large on the plays I said you shouldn't have, you lost your money, and you started complaining like a little bitch.

You can't even answer my earlier posts because you don't know what to say, moreover I have tried to explain a few aspects of betting Tennis so each of you can make their own wise decisions but you really seem to not appreciate anything unless me hitting 75% on huge Underdogs.

The easiest thing in the world of Covers is praise the winner one day and attacking him the next day and you are very good at it.

And shame on you on attacking a Covers All-Star respected member.




Again your simplistic analysis of a human being is pathetic. Are you a pyschiatrist? Maybe a pyschologist. Do you even know the difference?

As far as what I've done here it goes:

1) Cashed out once this year after being up 10 UNITS.

2) Current roll is up 53 UNITS from when I started. Not being for being a gamber that never wins.

3) Once turned $50.00 into $1,000 without playing favorites. Again, not bad for a player that loses.

Who is a Covers All-Star respected member?

Give us another gem today. Tell us how Roger will lose again because your expert human behavior analysis tells you so.

Cap based on stats not on if you think a player hustled for a ball or not in a previous match.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by Batemanpatrickl:

Again your simplistic analysis of a human being is pathetic. Are you a pyschiatrist? Maybe a pyschologist. Do you even know the difference?

As far as what I've done here it goes:

1) Cashed out once this year after being up 10 UNITS.

2) Current roll is up 53 UNITS from when I started. Not being for being a gamber that never wins.

3) Once turned $50.00 into $1,000 without playing favorites. Again, not bad for a player that loses.

Who is a Covers All-Star respected member?

Give us another gem today. Tell us how Roger will lose again because your expert human behavior analysis tells you so.

Cap based on stats not on if you think a player hustled for a ball or not in a previous match.



Why aren't you mentioning the record anymore now and changed the subject?
Because after clearly reading I made money you had to switch to something else?

I wish I started posting one week earlier when I cashed my Tsonga ticket vs Federer because of the same reasoning, I guess I maybe am a psychiatrist
but I am not going to brag about that.

Why don't you bet on WTA and start crying after your bitch loses the first set

Now you are up 53 units why even bother wasting time on this  thread.

Ace77 is an All-Star legend.

I cap the way I want to cap and I rather keep up the way I am doing since I am doing pretty good, but thanks for the heads up you genius who transformed 50$ in 1000$

woowwwwww



Now go kill yourself you stupid box.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2819
Posted: #43
can't we all just get along?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #44
I guess that my handicapping is good when I hit Kunitsyn and Querrey but then is wrong when trying to hit Hewitt.
Yeah, that makes sense.

Clown.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #45
"Not being for being a gamber that never wins."


I might not know the difference between a psychiatrist and a psychologist, which by the way I do, but you can not even write in your own language.

Now go away, you are late for the spelling bee.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2282
Posted: #46
I love covers
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1184
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by TennisCapper:

"Not being for being a gamber that never wins."


I might not know the difference between a psychiatrist and a psychologist, which by the way I do, but you can not even write in your own language.

Now go away, you are late for the spelling bee.




You live in a third world country scumbag. By the way did you bet Murray today because Roger doesn't want to win this tournament. I bet you did yet you don't here about another loss.

Gotta love someone from Belarus talking about money. How many people live in your shack?


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1488
Posted: #48
it's okay. he only wagered 0.000001% of his bankroll.



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 444
Posted: #49
I very rarely post, but this has to be the funniest thread of the month and I had to jump in!

Batemanpatrick -  what is the deal with you?

TennisCapper is right, you started a thread praising him after he won only to start bashing the shit out of him?
The guy had a few very sharp plays on underdogs and still as today even losing a few plays in a row, which happens to everybody, he is still up!

Just look at it this way, he won with Kunitsyn and Querrey as I learned in this thread. Imagine you played these 2 matches for 1 unit each, you would have won 8.6 units. This means that even if he loses 7 bets in a row, he is still up 1.6 units! So even a 2-7 record is a positive record! It is simple mathemathics!!! What do you have against this guy?

You really seem like a guy who just wants to start Internet trash talk but the things you said about Belarus, those are really depressing. You really need to calm down, you should be banned for those statements, read that all over again and tell me if that is something to say to somebody else.

Last but not least, did you even think that if he has an avatar with a picture of Victoria Azarenka he might just write Belarus cos that's where she is from?

Look at where I am from! Do you think I really am from here??





 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4004
Posted: #50
@lucash

Don't try to teach the kid math, he hasn't made it through third grade yet. By the way, great guess on my location! I haven't read anything from you in the past but, no offense, I don't think you are a Nobel prize or a genius of any sort and yet it actually did hit you.
Once more, this proves batemanpatrick's IQ...Yes, very low.




@batemanpatrick

Keep it up buddy, you are becoming the undisputed clown of the board!
Your ignorance is outrageous, you are just an idiot.
I should be done talking to you, let's see if you can provide some nice winners for the forum so you can help a guy like me who  has no idea of what he is doing. I need winners clearly, help a brother out please.

Go fuck yourself.

@mick

Can't really say I have ever seen your name across the board, nor that I have ever read something interesting from you, however I must say that your sister really does know how to suck a cock.
She must be the only one with quality in the family since your criticism is clearly hundreds of miles away from being just a little constructive.
In case you were wondering, I will send her home in a little cos she is boring after a while, so don't worry and tell mommy she is alright, just a little banged up but should be alright soon.


Since the board is probably bored about this thread, please guys just don't come in my threads and just make your own thread saying whatever the hell you want, I know I won't even look there.
Be mature and let the people who actually do respect my posts (you seemed to be one of them batemanpatrick just 2 days ago, remember?) enjoy them without you box bothering them.


Happy tipping.







All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.