@Calde13 Lmao tell me you know nothing about tennis without telling me. You probably didn’t watch Serena play to know how dominant she was on all surfaces.
Serena, who?
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Quote Originally Posted by MiXaoLon:
@Calde13 Lmao tell me you know nothing about tennis without telling me. You probably didn’t watch Serena play to know how dominant she was on all surfaces.
Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the time
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the time
No outlandish claims are being made here. If someone was saying Pegula would be greater than Serena that would be outlandish. But Mirra is 17. If there is zero possibility that she ever matches Serena then you believe that nobody ever will do so. I'll tell you someone else who will be a force in this next generation: someone else none of us have talked about or heard of. That's kind of how sports work.
I'll also point out that this argument is being made while presumably we're all watching what's happening on TV right now.
1
No outlandish claims are being made here. If someone was saying Pegula would be greater than Serena that would be outlandish. But Mirra is 17. If there is zero possibility that she ever matches Serena then you believe that nobody ever will do so. I'll tell you someone else who will be a force in this next generation: someone else none of us have talked about or heard of. That's kind of how sports work.
I'll also point out that this argument is being made while presumably we're all watching what's happening on TV right now.
Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the time
what are you implying why bring this up. Did you google Serena worst loss or something. No konta wasn’t 17 she was 27.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the time
what are you implying why bring this up. Did you google Serena worst loss or something. No konta wasn’t 17 she was 27.
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the timewhat are you implying why bring this up. Did you google Serena worst loss or something. No konta wasn’t 17 she was 27.
Serena was 17 - was those her worst losses ? - I just found some of her matches at age 17 - it is good to compare apples and apples and since Mirra is 17 I thought it would be relevant - but you want to compare it to when Serena was in her prime or what ? Doesn’t that kind of nolify the purpose of during a comparison? - so Serena was losing to nobody’s and Mirra has the past two weeks beaten EVERY single player that is anything at the moment
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97:
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the timewhat are you implying why bring this up. Did you google Serena worst loss or something. No konta wasn’t 17 she was 27.
Serena was 17 - was those her worst losses ? - I just found some of her matches at age 17 - it is good to compare apples and apples and since Mirra is 17 I thought it would be relevant - but you want to compare it to when Serena was in her prime or what ? Doesn’t that kind of nolify the purpose of during a comparison? - so Serena was losing to nobody’s and Mirra has the past two weeks beaten EVERY single player that is anything at the moment
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the timewhat are you implying why bring this up. Did you google Serena worst loss or something. No konta wasn’t 17 she was 27. Serena was 17 - was those her worst losses ? - I just found some of her matches at age 17 - it is good to compare apples and apples and since Mirra is 17 I thought it would be relevant - but you want to compare it to when Serena was in her prime or what ? Doesn’t that kind of nolify the purpose of during a comparison? - so Serena was losing to nobody’s and Mirra has the past two weeks beaten EVERY single player that is anything at the moment
??? serena was 37 not 17.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Wait wasn’t she the one that lost 6-1 6-1 to Joannette Kruger or 6-0 6-1 to Johanna Konta at age 17 ? So same age as Mirra - and in case you don’t know those two players that was because they were basically nobody’s that played at the timewhat are you implying why bring this up. Did you google Serena worst loss or something. No konta wasn’t 17 she was 27. Serena was 17 - was those her worst losses ? - I just found some of her matches at age 17 - it is good to compare apples and apples and since Mirra is 17 I thought it would be relevant - but you want to compare it to when Serena was in her prime or what ? Doesn’t that kind of nolify the purpose of during a comparison? - so Serena was losing to nobody’s and Mirra has the past two weeks beaten EVERY single player that is anything at the moment
Serena has 23 slams and over 1,000 matches won so let’s slow it down lol. I’m not saying it’s impossible to catch her but this nonsense of 50% win rate at grand slam is outlandish.
2
Serena has 23 slams and over 1,000 matches won so let’s slow it down lol. I’m not saying it’s impossible to catch her but this nonsense of 50% win rate at grand slam is outlandish.
correct, lol she lost to kruger and konta by lopsided scores. thought you meant konta, never heard of the other person until now. but what are you implying. you picked a random match a lopsided loss to support a case of mirra winning 23+ majors? that's outlandish bruh.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
The match was in 1998 - so you do the math
correct, lol she lost to kruger and konta by lopsided scores. thought you meant konta, never heard of the other person until now. but what are you implying. you picked a random match a lopsided loss to support a case of mirra winning 23+ majors? that's outlandish bruh.
Serena has 23 slams and over 1,000 matches won so let’s slow it down lol. I’m not saying it’s impossible to catch her but this nonsense of 50% win rate at grand slam is outlandish.
What odds are you providing for such a bet - because if it is high enough we can find an escrow tomorrow
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Quote Originally Posted by MiXaoLon:
Serena has 23 slams and over 1,000 matches won so let’s slow it down lol. I’m not saying it’s impossible to catch her but this nonsense of 50% win rate at grand slam is outlandish.
What odds are you providing for such a bet - because if it is high enough we can find an escrow tomorrow
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: The match was in 1998 - so you do the mathcorrect, lol she lost to kruger and konta by lopsided scores. thought you meant konta, never heard of the other person until now. but what are you implying. you picked a random match a lopsided loss to support a case of mirra winning 23+ majors? that's outlandish bruh.
I literally took the first two matches I found from when she was 17 - if you can find two matches where she beats the rank 1+2 in a big tournament be my guest and post them ??
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97:
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: The match was in 1998 - so you do the mathcorrect, lol she lost to kruger and konta by lopsided scores. thought you meant konta, never heard of the other person until now. but what are you implying. you picked a random match a lopsided loss to support a case of mirra winning 23+ majors? that's outlandish bruh.
I literally took the first two matches I found from when she was 17 - if you can find two matches where she beats the rank 1+2 in a big tournament be my guest and post them ??
also mirra has a year more experience, she started at 15 while serena started at 16. what do you mean what odds, who's waiting around 15 years to cash out. I wouldnt wait 5 years unless it was life changing money. I like mirra but lets pump the brakes, she doesnt have a dominating game to begin with, not a power game, more of a finesse game which is cool, maybe closest comparison is muchova. let her win a major first.
0
also mirra has a year more experience, she started at 15 while serena started at 16. what do you mean what odds, who's waiting around 15 years to cash out. I wouldnt wait 5 years unless it was life changing money. I like mirra but lets pump the brakes, she doesnt have a dominating game to begin with, not a power game, more of a finesse game which is cool, maybe closest comparison is muchova. let her win a major first.
also mirra has 2 years more experience, she started at 15 while serena started at 17. what do you mean what odds, who's waiting around 15 years to cash out. I wouldnt wait 5 years unless it was life changing money. I like mirra but lets pump the brakes, she doesnt have a dominating game to begin with, not a power game, more of a finesse game which is cool, maybe closest comparison is muchova. let her win a major first.
I have a lot of money so we can easily make it “life changing” money
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97:
also mirra has 2 years more experience, she started at 15 while serena started at 17. what do you mean what odds, who's waiting around 15 years to cash out. I wouldnt wait 5 years unless it was life changing money. I like mirra but lets pump the brakes, she doesnt have a dominating game to begin with, not a power game, more of a finesse game which is cool, maybe closest comparison is muchova. let her win a major first.
I have a lot of money so we can easily make it “life changing” money
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: The match was in 1998 - so you do the mathcorrect, lol she lost to kruger and konta by lopsided scores. thought you meant konta, never heard of the other person until now. but what are you implying. you picked a random match a lopsided loss to support a case of mirra winning 23+ majors? that's outlandish bruh. I literally took the first two matches I found from when she was 17 - if you can find two matches where she beats the rank 1+2 in a big tournament be my guest and post them ??
serena did something better since it was just her 3rd pro match ever, aged 16. she beat 5th ranked mary pierce and the next day she beat 4th ranked monica seles. serena was ranked 304th in the world at the time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: The match was in 1998 - so you do the mathcorrect, lol she lost to kruger and konta by lopsided scores. thought you meant konta, never heard of the other person until now. but what are you implying. you picked a random match a lopsided loss to support a case of mirra winning 23+ majors? that's outlandish bruh. I literally took the first two matches I found from when she was 17 - if you can find two matches where she beats the rank 1+2 in a big tournament be my guest and post them ??
serena did something better since it was just her 3rd pro match ever, aged 16. she beat 5th ranked mary pierce and the next day she beat 4th ranked monica seles. serena was ranked 304th in the world at the time.
Very few people in this world has been bigger fans than I of Serena Williams I was even part of the movement that claimed she would even have a chance playing versus a guy (if you guys remember that was a thing) - But I for real think Mirra will give her a good run for her money here - but right now it is speculations from both sides - both me and you guys and we only know in at least 10 years where we stand - so let’s put it to rest - we can say you guys are right if you want - I will watch Rune now - as if he wins he will complete my perfect Indian Wells run this year - so take care
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Very few people in this world has been bigger fans than I of Serena Williams I was even part of the movement that claimed she would even have a chance playing versus a guy (if you guys remember that was a thing) - But I for real think Mirra will give her a good run for her money here - but right now it is speculations from both sides - both me and you guys and we only know in at least 10 years where we stand - so let’s put it to rest - we can say you guys are right if you want - I will watch Rune now - as if he wins he will complete my perfect Indian Wells run this year - so take care
Very few people in this world has been bigger fans than I of Serena Williams I was even part of the movement that claimed she would even have a chance playing versus a guy - But I for real think Mirra will give her a good run for her money here - but right now it is speculations from both sides - both me and you guys and we only know in at least 10 years where we stand - so let’s put it to rest - we can say you guys are right if you want - I will watch Rune now - as if he wins he will complete my perfect Indian Wells run this year - so take care
oh darn thought I was about to be rich. we could have did a 5 year bet. if mirra has more grand slams than serena did in 5 year period. mind you serena won her first in 1999 and didnt win her 2nd until 2002 so bet would heavily favor mirra as she'd have tons of time to collect major victories. from 1999 to 2003 serena won 6 majors, thats 6 out of 20 tries. surely mirra can do better than that and you could collect a cool ?85,192,880.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Very few people in this world has been bigger fans than I of Serena Williams I was even part of the movement that claimed she would even have a chance playing versus a guy - But I for real think Mirra will give her a good run for her money here - but right now it is speculations from both sides - both me and you guys and we only know in at least 10 years where we stand - so let’s put it to rest - we can say you guys are right if you want - I will watch Rune now - as if he wins he will complete my perfect Indian Wells run this year - so take care
oh darn thought I was about to be rich. we could have did a 5 year bet. if mirra has more grand slams than serena did in 5 year period. mind you serena won her first in 1999 and didnt win her 2nd until 2002 so bet would heavily favor mirra as she'd have tons of time to collect major victories. from 1999 to 2003 serena won 6 majors, thats 6 out of 20 tries. surely mirra can do better than that and you could collect a cool ?85,192,880.
Do you have 85 million to put up as well ? Because I can probably gather it within a few weeks - maybe a month - I didn’t know you would bet that much so I probably need to take contact to a few guys I know etc
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Do you have 85 million to put up as well ? Because I can probably gather it within a few weeks - maybe a month - I didn’t know you would bet that much so I probably need to take contact to a few guys I know etc
Great match. One of the underrated improvements in her game is mental. Not acting like a teenager by getting overly frustrated or getting tight in big moments. She's been clutch and mostly cool headed since she started working with Conchita.
0
@Uman
Great match. One of the underrated improvements in her game is mental. Not acting like a teenager by getting overly frustrated or getting tight in big moments. She's been clutch and mostly cool headed since she started working with Conchita.
Today I'm on Teodora Kostovic +5.5 and probably gonna throw a sprinkle on ML at +400.
I'm also considering Townsend. She crashed out of IW quals hard, which was concerning, but she looked pretty good yesterday and I'm definitely swayed by her big North American hard court success that I outlined in an earlier thread.
0
Today I'm on Teodora Kostovic +5.5 and probably gonna throw a sprinkle on ML at +400.
I'm also considering Townsend. She crashed out of IW quals hard, which was concerning, but she looked pretty good yesterday and I'm definitely swayed by her big North American hard court success that I outlined in an earlier thread.
Hot Forum Topics
