I back tested the Rangers in 2013 because they were a team I thought would go over quite a bit and they had 6 series that either were all unders or had a push and all unders. So there is potential to lose all three bets in a series chase. But I didnt back check any other teams. I have noticed that Overs tend to have more juice on them even in the NL. I would think there would be money just chasing Unders. But overall, I might start tagging along on your picks because they theory is sound. But I dont like chasing with juice on the Overs.
0
I back tested the Rangers in 2013 because they were a team I thought would go over quite a bit and they had 6 series that either were all unders or had a push and all unders. So there is potential to lose all three bets in a series chase. But I didnt back check any other teams. I have noticed that Overs tend to have more juice on them even in the NL. I would think there would be money just chasing Unders. But overall, I might start tagging along on your picks because they theory is sound. But I dont like chasing with juice on the Overs.
If any of those series were interleague at NL home you can dismiss it.. also if it started off with a push , we drop the series completely. . I tweaked this system to only pick AL overs
0
If any of those series were interleague at NL home you can dismiss it.. also if it started off with a push , we drop the series completely. . I tweaked this system to only pick AL overs
If any of those series were interleague at NL home you can dismiss it.. also if it started off with a push , we drop the series completely. . I tweaked this system to only pick AL overs
0
If any of those series were interleague at NL home you can dismiss it.. also if it started off with a push , we drop the series completely. . I tweaked this system to only pick AL overs