I included series were there was a push in game one just for a complete record, but yes I would skip those too.
The NL gave back some profits.
AL and NL totals - 178 wins, 16 3 game losses, 7 2 game losses, 1 4 game loss. The 16 3 game losses would be 132 units, the 2 game losses would be 24 units, and the 4 game loss 18 units. Wins totaled 178 units, losses totaled 174 units. Leaves very little profit. I'll do some more investigating, I have an idea.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
I included series were there was a push in game one just for a complete record, but yes I would skip those too.
The NL gave back some profits.
AL and NL totals - 178 wins, 16 3 game losses, 7 2 game losses, 1 4 game loss. The 16 3 game losses would be 132 units, the 2 game losses would be 24 units, and the 4 game loss 18 units. Wins totaled 178 units, losses totaled 174 units. Leaves very little profit. I'll do some more investigating, I have an idea.
Theres been 16 3 game under in a series. I hope ur not looking for 3 in a row... because if it goes under on the last game of one series and then under for the first two games of the next series and then over thats a win.
Also make sure ur not double counting the interleague plays or any other series. Remember its per series and 2 game series is not included
0
Theres been 16 3 game under in a series. I hope ur not looking for 3 in a row... because if it goes under on the last game of one series and then under for the first two games of the next series and then over thats a win.
Also make sure ur not double counting the interleague plays or any other series. Remember its per series and 2 game series is not included
I counted all series including at the beginning of the year. I did not count 2 game series. The 2 game series I showed as losses were when the first game were 2 Unders and a Push in the series. No overlapping with last game in one series and first two in another, just strict 3 games or more series and I did not double count the losses from interleague.
The idea I had didn't work out. I've been trying to come up with a good totals system for a few years now. Will keep plugging away.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
I counted all series including at the beginning of the year. I did not count 2 game series. The 2 game series I showed as losses were when the first game were 2 Unders and a Push in the series. No overlapping with last game in one series and first two in another, just strict 3 games or more series and I did not double count the losses from interleague.
The idea I had didn't work out. I've been trying to come up with a good totals system for a few years now. Will keep plugging away.
So betting every series isnt the way to go, It wasnt my intention in the first place. if you want to be perfectly safe you make one pick on a friday and monday. Everytime you pick u have a 13 out of 15 chance to win. Thats above 90 percent
0
So betting every series isnt the way to go, It wasnt my intention in the first place. if you want to be perfectly safe you make one pick on a friday and monday. Everytime you pick u have a 13 out of 15 chance to win. Thats above 90 percent
If you have the time to do it, maybe try taking a look at the Over record for the top 5 teams in terms of runs scored and the Under record for the bottom 5. A quick look at 3-4 teams and I noticed that in any 3 or 4 game series, the high scoring teams always hit at least 1 over and the low scoring teams always hit at least 1 under. So, this wouldn't be a continuous chase, but would start with each 3 or 4 game series and ends when the team hits the O or U.
0
Dan-
If you have the time to do it, maybe try taking a look at the Over record for the top 5 teams in terms of runs scored and the Under record for the bottom 5. A quick look at 3-4 teams and I noticed that in any 3 or 4 game series, the high scoring teams always hit at least 1 over and the low scoring teams always hit at least 1 under. So, this wouldn't be a continuous chase, but would start with each 3 or 4 game series and ends when the team hits the O or U.
Guys think of it like this because the numbers doesnt tell the true situation.
For example yesterday and today there are 15 series, there will not be more than 2 of those series all going under, maybe none. But no more than two.
So there are 13 out of 15 winners.. choose one of the 13.. blindly choose 1 and ur chances of winning is over 90 percent.. doing ur homework and choosing ur chances should be closer to 100 percent
0
Guys think of it like this because the numbers doesnt tell the true situation.
For example yesterday and today there are 15 series, there will not be more than 2 of those series all going under, maybe none. But no more than two.
So there are 13 out of 15 winners.. choose one of the 13.. blindly choose 1 and ur chances of winning is over 90 percent.. doing ur homework and choosing ur chances should be closer to 100 percent
Im already being a little more risky and I am choosing 2 out of the fifteen but the odds are still with me.. im just trying to win more at a time so when I lose I would have made double already..
0
Im already being a little more risky and I am choosing 2 out of the fifteen but the odds are still with me.. im just trying to win more at a time so when I lose I would have made double already..
Boston/Rays series (-55 for now) Game 2 over (whatever the line is) 2u
Im tempted to jump ship on this series (because both clubs have really been cold for the past week) and roll with game 2 of another series that went under in game 1, like rockies/atl, or dodger/phillies.
what u guys think?
0
3-0 for series +150
Boston/Rays series (-55 for now) Game 2 over (whatever the line is) 2u
Im tempted to jump ship on this series (because both clubs have really been cold for the past week) and roll with game 2 of another series that went under in game 1, like rockies/atl, or dodger/phillies.
Hot Forum Topics
