The Testing Phase For 1 Halfs in NBA
I am not getting excited just pointing something out that might want to keep an eye on. Do you have a record of the not hitting 1half double on second? I know it won't hit every time but nothing ever does. But even if you went 2-1 yesterday on 2half doubles you still come out ahead and that is if you have 3 that don't hit 1half which 16-9 (I think is current record) would mean that out of the 9 losses you would have to hit 6-3 to stay ahead but again. 6-3 would give you better money than 16-9. So overall your record would be 22-3. Each win you win $100 and each loss you lose $300. So by my figures you would be ahead $1300. And at 16-9 you are only up $700. And to me it only makes sense that if two teams score more than they are used to scoring in 1half then they would slow down by 4th quarter which every game did yesterday. I understand it could have been a fluke. But I am going to role with it. BOL today!
Fixed typo above. ![]()
I am not getting excited just pointing something out that might want to keep an eye on. Do you have a record of the not hitting 1half double on second? I know it won't hit every time but nothing ever does. But even if you went 2-1 yesterday on 2half doubles you still come out ahead and that is if you have 3 that don't hit 1half which 16-9 (I think is current record) would mean that out of the 9 losses you would have to hit 6-3 to stay ahead but again. 6-3 would give you better money than 16-9. So overall your record would be 22-3. Each win you win $100 and each loss you lose $300. So by my figures you would be ahead $1300. And at 16-9 you are only up $700. And to me it only makes sense that if two teams score more than they are used to scoring in 1half then they would slow down by 4th quarter which every game did yesterday. I understand it could have been a fluke. But I am going to role with it. BOL today!
Fixed typo above. ![]()
Lalakers/Houst March 27
1h U 102
1half points were 107
2nd half line was 97 it went over again hit 103
26th of MARCH
MIL/MIAMI
1h o 92 hit like 85
2h line was 94 went way under again hit 78
so theres 2 examples i just found
hope this helps in your luckiness from yesterday
Lalakers/Houst March 27
1h U 102
1half points were 107
2nd half line was 97 it went over again hit 103
26th of MARCH
MIL/MIAMI
1h o 92 hit like 85
2h line was 94 went way under again hit 78
so theres 2 examples i just found
hope this helps in your luckiness from yesterday
Ok so lets take yesterday for instance. If one would have missed. You are still up 1U. Still better than being down 1U. If 2 out of three miss you are down 2U instead of down 1U. I think it is worth a shot to say that at least 2 out of three games will be opposite of first halfs plus the money made off normal system. I am still confident in it. You might be right but this is one of those things that I will have to see for myself. ![]()
Ok so lets take yesterday for instance. If one would have missed. You are still up 1U. Still better than being down 1U. If 2 out of three miss you are down 2U instead of down 1U. I think it is worth a shot to say that at least 2 out of three games will be opposite of first halfs plus the money made off normal system. I am still confident in it. You might be right but this is one of those things that I will have to see for myself. ![]()
Luongo,
Maybe we should cap second halfs of the games you are going to play just to follow. For example, if the first half loses you will already have a number for second half. If the line is significantly over/under what you capped it may be worthwhile chasing. I am just thinking if you can hit 65-70% each half the odds of losing both would only be around 10% which would give you around 60U profit out of 100 plays.
Luongo,
Maybe we should cap second halfs of the games you are going to play just to follow. For example, if the first half loses you will already have a number for second half. If the line is significantly over/under what you capped it may be worthwhile chasing. I am just thinking if you can hit 65-70% each half the odds of losing both would only be around 10% which would give you around 60U profit out of 100 plays.
Long time follower not big on post, BUT, this has my attention and i think someone tried it before many years ago on Covers.
Would tonights games 3/31 be as follows?:
Lakers 47.6/Hawks 49.8 = 97 (my book has 98 1/2) small play
Bucks 46/Cavs 53.4 = 99 (my book has 97 1/2) no play
clips 46.6/Raps 46.6 = 93 (my book has 105) strong play
76ers 47.8/cats 47.8 = 96 ( my book has 95 1/2) no play
Thunder 58/Celts 52.6 = 111 (my book has 97) PLAY OVER ???
Heat 50.6/Pistons 45.6 = 96 (my book has 94 1/2) no play
Suns 59.8/Nets 45 = 105 (my book has 107 1/2) small play
wizards 45.4/Hornet 45.8 = 91 (my book has 99 1/2) large play
kings 47.6/timber 47.4 = 95 (my book has 104 1/2) play
Mav 56.6/Grizz 55 = 112 (my book has 103 1/2) PLAY OVER???
i didnt calculate the last three games, am i on the right track?....totally off with one side or the other?....totally off with both???
Thanks for you help!
CHEERS!!!!
Long time follower not big on post, BUT, this has my attention and i think someone tried it before many years ago on Covers.
Would tonights games 3/31 be as follows?:
Lakers 47.6/Hawks 49.8 = 97 (my book has 98 1/2) small play
Bucks 46/Cavs 53.4 = 99 (my book has 97 1/2) no play
clips 46.6/Raps 46.6 = 93 (my book has 105) strong play
76ers 47.8/cats 47.8 = 96 ( my book has 95 1/2) no play
Thunder 58/Celts 52.6 = 111 (my book has 97) PLAY OVER ???
Heat 50.6/Pistons 45.6 = 96 (my book has 94 1/2) no play
Suns 59.8/Nets 45 = 105 (my book has 107 1/2) small play
wizards 45.4/Hornet 45.8 = 91 (my book has 99 1/2) large play
kings 47.6/timber 47.4 = 95 (my book has 104 1/2) play
Mav 56.6/Grizz 55 = 112 (my book has 103 1/2) PLAY OVER???
i didnt calculate the last three games, am i on the right track?....totally off with one side or the other?....totally off with both???
Thanks for you help!
CHEERS!!!!
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,478
-
Monday 09/21/2026
459
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,266
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,544
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
3,956
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,032
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,506
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,763
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,449
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
