Today Utah again (They lose yesterday and I think is shorthanded...
The Frequency System
In my haste..the list on POST #1 is the teams to wager against...
What you see below in this POST , is the list to wager with (which is the opposite team as above- same game)
Sorry for the error, cut and pasted the wrong column - but glad I caught it before commencing.
This is correct:
1 1/5/2011 MINNESOTA
2 1/6/2011 Oklahoma_City
3 1/7/2011 MINNESOTA
4 1/22/2011 Toronto
5 1/22/2011 NEW JERSEY
6 1/24/2011 Oklahoma_City
7 1/26/2011 PHOENIX
8 1/28/2011 Detroit
9 1/30/2011 Utah
10 1/30/2011 PHOENIX
11 1/31/2011 UTAH
12 2/2/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY
13 2/3/2011 ORLANDO
14 2/4/2011 ATLANTA
15 2/4/2011 BOSTON
16 2/4/2011 INDIANA
17 2/5/2011 Chicago
18 2/5/2011 LA_Lakers
19 2/5/2011 CLEVELAND
20 2/5/2011 MINNESOTA
21 2/7/2011 Boston
22 2/7/2011 Cleveland
23 2/7/2011 Phoenix
24 2/7/2011 Minnesota
25 2/7/2011 Chicago
26 2/8/2011 Minnesota
27 2/8/2011 Indiana
28 2/8/2011 ORLANDO
29 2/9/2011 INDIANA
30 2/9/2011 NEW JERSEY
31 2/9/2011 NEW YORK
32 2/9/2011 SACRAMENTO
33 2/10/2011 PHOENIX
34 2/11/2011 CLEVELAND
35 2/11/2011 DETROIT
36 2/11/2011 ORLANDO
37 2/11/2011 TORONTO
38 2/12/2011 Chicago
39 2/12/2011 ATLANTA
40 2/13/2011 BOSTON
41 2/14/2011 MINNESOTA
42 2/16/2011 Sacramento
43 2/16/2011 MINNESOTA
44 2/16/2011 UTAH
45 2/17/2011 PHOENIX
46 2/22/2011 Boston
47 2/22/2011 Indiana
48 2/22/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY
49 2/23/2011 Utah
50 2/23/2011 INDIANA
51 2/25/2011 Sacramento
52 2/25/2011 MINNESOTA
53 2/26/2011 Utah
54 2/26/2011 Boston
55 2/27/2011 CLEVELAND
56 2/27/2011 MINNESOTA
57 2/28/2011 Chicago
58 2/28/2011 SACRAMENTO
59 3/1/2011 MILWAUKEE
60 3/2/2011 Minnesota
61 3/4/2011 Minnesota
62 3/5/2011 Minnesota
63 3/7/2011 MINNESOTA
64 3/8/2011 Milwaukee
65 3/8/2011 INDIANA
66 3/8/2011 PHOENIX
67 3/9/2011 Oklahoma_City
68 3/9/2011 SAN ANTONIO
69 3/11/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY
70 3/27/2011 GOLDEN STATE
71 3/30/2011 Miami
72 3/30/2011 INDIANA
73 4/1/2011 Chicago
74 4/1/2011 Cleveland
75 4/3/2011 BOSTON
76 4/3/2011 CHARLOTTE
77 4/3/2011 SACRAMENTO
78 4/5/2011 BOSTON
79 4/6/2011 New_Jersey
80 4/6/2011 LA_Clippers
81 4/6/2011 New_York
82 4/6/2011 INDIANA
83 4/8/2011 Milwaukee
84 4/8/2011 Toronto
85 4/8/2011 BOSTON
86 4/8/2011 NEW ORLEANS
In my haste..the list on POST #1 is the teams to wager against...
What you see below in this POST , is the list to wager with (which is the opposite team as above- same game)
Sorry for the error, cut and pasted the wrong column - but glad I caught it before commencing.
This is correct:
1 1/5/2011 MINNESOTA
2 1/6/2011 Oklahoma_City
3 1/7/2011 MINNESOTA
4 1/22/2011 Toronto
5 1/22/2011 NEW JERSEY
6 1/24/2011 Oklahoma_City
7 1/26/2011 PHOENIX
8 1/28/2011 Detroit
9 1/30/2011 Utah
10 1/30/2011 PHOENIX
11 1/31/2011 UTAH
12 2/2/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY
13 2/3/2011 ORLANDO
14 2/4/2011 ATLANTA
15 2/4/2011 BOSTON
16 2/4/2011 INDIANA
17 2/5/2011 Chicago
18 2/5/2011 LA_Lakers
19 2/5/2011 CLEVELAND
20 2/5/2011 MINNESOTA
21 2/7/2011 Boston
22 2/7/2011 Cleveland
23 2/7/2011 Phoenix
24 2/7/2011 Minnesota
25 2/7/2011 Chicago
26 2/8/2011 Minnesota
27 2/8/2011 Indiana
28 2/8/2011 ORLANDO
29 2/9/2011 INDIANA
30 2/9/2011 NEW JERSEY
31 2/9/2011 NEW YORK
32 2/9/2011 SACRAMENTO
33 2/10/2011 PHOENIX
34 2/11/2011 CLEVELAND
35 2/11/2011 DETROIT
36 2/11/2011 ORLANDO
37 2/11/2011 TORONTO
38 2/12/2011 Chicago
39 2/12/2011 ATLANTA
40 2/13/2011 BOSTON
41 2/14/2011 MINNESOTA
42 2/16/2011 Sacramento
43 2/16/2011 MINNESOTA
44 2/16/2011 UTAH
45 2/17/2011 PHOENIX
46 2/22/2011 Boston
47 2/22/2011 Indiana
48 2/22/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY
49 2/23/2011 Utah
50 2/23/2011 INDIANA
51 2/25/2011 Sacramento
52 2/25/2011 MINNESOTA
53 2/26/2011 Utah
54 2/26/2011 Boston
55 2/27/2011 CLEVELAND
56 2/27/2011 MINNESOTA
57 2/28/2011 Chicago
58 2/28/2011 SACRAMENTO
59 3/1/2011 MILWAUKEE
60 3/2/2011 Minnesota
61 3/4/2011 Minnesota
62 3/5/2011 Minnesota
63 3/7/2011 MINNESOTA
64 3/8/2011 Milwaukee
65 3/8/2011 INDIANA
66 3/8/2011 PHOENIX
67 3/9/2011 Oklahoma_City
68 3/9/2011 SAN ANTONIO
69 3/11/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY
70 3/27/2011 GOLDEN STATE
71 3/30/2011 Miami
72 3/30/2011 INDIANA
73 4/1/2011 Chicago
74 4/1/2011 Cleveland
75 4/3/2011 BOSTON
76 4/3/2011 CHARLOTTE
77 4/3/2011 SACRAMENTO
78 4/5/2011 BOSTON
79 4/6/2011 New_Jersey
80 4/6/2011 LA_Clippers
81 4/6/2011 New_York
82 4/6/2011 INDIANA
83 4/8/2011 Milwaukee
84 4/8/2011 Toronto
85 4/8/2011 BOSTON
86 4/8/2011 NEW ORLEANS
1 1/5/2011 MINNESOTA -7.5 L
2 1/6/2011 Oklahoma_City -3 W
3 1/7/2011 MINNESOTA +2.5 L
4 1/22/2011 Toronto +10.5 L
5 1/22/2011 NEW JERSEY +5 W
6 1/24/2011 Oklahoma_City +3.5 W
7 1/26/2011 PHOENIX -6.5 L
8 1/28/2011 Detroit +8.5 W
9 1/30/2011 Utah +4.5 L
10 1/30/2011 PHOENIX -1.5 W
11 1/31/2011 UTAH -3 W
12 2/2/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY -7 W
7 Wins - 5 losses 58.33%
Remember, I am only tracking games that register a difference of 20 or greater for record total. Historical winning % ATS at this level is 61.38%.
Tonight's Frequency values..
DATE TIME HOME F.V. VISITOR F.V DIFF
2/3/2011 10:30 PM GOLDEN STATE -11 Milwaukee 6 17
2/3/2011 10:30 PM LA LAKERS 6 San_Antonio 12 6
2/3/2011 8:00 PM ORLANDO 12 Miami -11 23
Use the chart on post #16 for winning % values.....for example, Milwaukee has a value of 17 tonight, the chart give a 58.20% chance of covering ATS at that level.
If people are following along, I can post the values everyday...
Oil and Semaper, thanks for tracking ..
1 1/5/2011 MINNESOTA -7.5 L
2 1/6/2011 Oklahoma_City -3 W
3 1/7/2011 MINNESOTA +2.5 L
4 1/22/2011 Toronto +10.5 L
5 1/22/2011 NEW JERSEY +5 W
6 1/24/2011 Oklahoma_City +3.5 W
7 1/26/2011 PHOENIX -6.5 L
8 1/28/2011 Detroit +8.5 W
9 1/30/2011 Utah +4.5 L
10 1/30/2011 PHOENIX -1.5 W
11 1/31/2011 UTAH -3 W
12 2/2/2011 OKLAHOMA CITY -7 W
7 Wins - 5 losses 58.33%
Remember, I am only tracking games that register a difference of 20 or greater for record total. Historical winning % ATS at this level is 61.38%.
Tonight's Frequency values..
DATE TIME HOME F.V. VISITOR F.V DIFF
2/3/2011 10:30 PM GOLDEN STATE -11 Milwaukee 6 17
2/3/2011 10:30 PM LA LAKERS 6 San_Antonio 12 6
2/3/2011 8:00 PM ORLANDO 12 Miami -11 23
Use the chart on post #16 for winning % values.....for example, Milwaukee has a value of 17 tonight, the chart give a 58.20% chance of covering ATS at that level.
If people are following along, I can post the values everyday...
Oil and Semaper, thanks for tracking ..
Feb 3 [0-1] 7-6 ATS
Magic -1 [Loss]
Feb 4 [1-2] 8-8 ATS
Hawks -7.5 [Loss]
Celtics -7 [Loss]
Pacers -4 [Win]
Today 4 plays:
Bulls, Lakers, Cavaliers, Timberwolves
![]()
Feb 3 [0-1] 7-6 ATS
Magic -1 [Loss]
Feb 4 [1-2] 8-8 ATS
Hawks -7.5 [Loss]
Celtics -7 [Loss]
Pacers -4 [Win]
Today 4 plays:
Bulls, Lakers, Cavaliers, Timberwolves
![]()
2/7/2011 3 W, 2 L
2/8/2011 3 W, 0 L
Record to Date: 15 wins, 12 losses, 1 Push 55.56%
Tonight Plays (2/9/2011)
29 2/9/2011 INDIANA
30 2/9/2011 NEW JERSEY
31 2/9/2011 NEW YORK
32 2/9/2011 SACRAMENTO
2/7/2011 3 W, 2 L
2/8/2011 3 W, 0 L
Record to Date: 15 wins, 12 losses, 1 Push 55.56%
Tonight Plays (2/9/2011)
29 2/9/2011 INDIANA
30 2/9/2011 NEW JERSEY
31 2/9/2011 NEW YORK
32 2/9/2011 SACRAMENTO
33 2/10/2011 PHOENIX -6.5 W
Record to Date: 18 Wins, 14 Losses, 1 Push 56.25%
4 Plays for Friday, 2/11/2011
34 2/11/2011 CLEVELAND
35 2/11/2011 DETROIT
36 2/11/2011 ORLANDO
37 2/11/2011 TORONTO
33 2/10/2011 PHOENIX -6.5 W
Record to Date: 18 Wins, 14 Losses, 1 Push 56.25%
4 Plays for Friday, 2/11/2011
34 2/11/2011 CLEVELAND
35 2/11/2011 DETROIT
36 2/11/2011 ORLANDO
37 2/11/2011 TORONTO
I use Kelly Criteria for this based on a 55% winning percentage, which is about 5.5% of bankroll for each play...I don't use each game as an independent event, but each day...so if there are 4 plays tonight, I will bet 5.5% on each of whatever my balance is to start the day, same amount on all 4 games, then tomorrow, 5.5% of whatever my balance is to start that day..etc..
Easier to manage the money and I don't have to worry about the 7 o'clock plays - then trying to get in a later play based on that game's outcome, as the outcome is not always know before the next play starts..
I am working on one for baseball as well, 30,000 games will be back tested total, every game since 1999 up till now. ...look very, very, promising thus far...and there will be many more plays that the NBA system....which avergaes between 150-200 plays each year, I think baseball will provide us with 500 plays per season.....
G/L
I use Kelly Criteria for this based on a 55% winning percentage, which is about 5.5% of bankroll for each play...I don't use each game as an independent event, but each day...so if there are 4 plays tonight, I will bet 5.5% on each of whatever my balance is to start the day, same amount on all 4 games, then tomorrow, 5.5% of whatever my balance is to start that day..etc..
Easier to manage the money and I don't have to worry about the 7 o'clock plays - then trying to get in a later play based on that game's outcome, as the outcome is not always know before the next play starts..
I am working on one for baseball as well, 30,000 games will be back tested total, every game since 1999 up till now. ...look very, very, promising thus far...and there will be many more plays that the NBA system....which avergaes between 150-200 plays each year, I think baseball will provide us with 500 plays per season.....
G/L
I am working on one for baseball as well, 30,000 games will be back tested total, every game since 1999 up till now. ...look very, very, promising thus far...and there will be many more plays that the NBA system....which avergaes between 150-200 plays each year, I think baseball will provide us with 500 plays per season.....
G/L ![]()
Sweet!
![]()
I am working on one for baseball as well, 30,000 games will be back tested total, every game since 1999 up till now. ...look very, very, promising thus far...and there will be many more plays that the NBA system....which avergaes between 150-200 plays each year, I think baseball will provide us with 500 plays per season.....
G/L ![]()
Sweet!
![]()
Good job on the total system XLR8..been following along nicely..Back testing results have been very, very encouraging to say the least...6000 games over 5 years....I would go back farther..but it is very tedious calculations for each game..
semaper..
Picks are always ATS...assumes the line has taken into account injuries, winning %'s, all those things that determine the strength of a team on any given night,...Team A should beat Team B by X amount of points in order to get the same amount wagered on both sides of a game.. The line implies each team will be at "normal levels"..
Human activity and performance is based on brain wave frequencies...OR "in the zone" as one would refer to it for a high level of performance.
Think of teams that look flat with no energy..and think of teams that can do no wrong... This is another area of research that has nothing to do with sports, but along a scientific hypothesis I am attempting to document. If I am correct, it will be true for all things in life, not just sports.
The questions one needs to answer:
What determines those frequencies that are dominant at a certain point in time at a certain place? Many, many things.
What determines which frequencies each entity responds positively to, and negatively to? Like causes produce like results...look back and see the cause, know the results.
Those will be the focus as this unfolds...I think I know some of the answers, the results will be the judge.
To reveal anymore than that would be premature at this point...but I will teach a man to fish, so to speak, when the time is right.
assuming this can be measured, i would think it would be most applicable to the nba and mlb where you have so many games, back to back games, etc..
any truth to the rumor that obama's frequency energuy level is expected to max out on november 6, 2012?
good luck with the system.
Good job on the total system XLR8..been following along nicely..Back testing results have been very, very encouraging to say the least...6000 games over 5 years....I would go back farther..but it is very tedious calculations for each game..
semaper..
Picks are always ATS...assumes the line has taken into account injuries, winning %'s, all those things that determine the strength of a team on any given night,...Team A should beat Team B by X amount of points in order to get the same amount wagered on both sides of a game.. The line implies each team will be at "normal levels"..
Human activity and performance is based on brain wave frequencies...OR "in the zone" as one would refer to it for a high level of performance.
Think of teams that look flat with no energy..and think of teams that can do no wrong... This is another area of research that has nothing to do with sports, but along a scientific hypothesis I am attempting to document. If I am correct, it will be true for all things in life, not just sports.
The questions one needs to answer:
What determines those frequencies that are dominant at a certain point in time at a certain place? Many, many things.
What determines which frequencies each entity responds positively to, and negatively to? Like causes produce like results...look back and see the cause, know the results.
Those will be the focus as this unfolds...I think I know some of the answers, the results will be the judge.
To reveal anymore than that would be premature at this point...but I will teach a man to fish, so to speak, when the time is right.
assuming this can be measured, i would think it would be most applicable to the nba and mlb where you have so many games, back to back games, etc..
any truth to the rumor that obama's frequency energuy level is expected to max out on november 6, 2012?
good luck with the system.
I'm open to the idea (being a big proponent of cycles and how different magnitudes of them re-inforce/dampen each other...etc.) and I've got your lists and am monitoring it...
One error i ask you to clarify: Item #84, April 08, Toronto is listed on BOTH lists (negatives to fade, and positives to play)...Philly, their opponents on that day should show up on one of the lists, instead, right?
Cheers,
Fitguy
I'm open to the idea (being a big proponent of cycles and how different magnitudes of them re-inforce/dampen each other...etc.) and I've got your lists and am monitoring it...
One error i ask you to clarify: Item #84, April 08, Toronto is listed on BOTH lists (negatives to fade, and positives to play)...Philly, their opponents on that day should show up on one of the lists, instead, right?
Cheers,
Fitguy
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,468
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Monday 09/21/2026
452
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,543
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
4,955
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
3,793
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,729
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,211
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,759
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,440
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
