Posted:
#26
Some of the best long term NFL systems are active today
Posted:
#30
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by thegamblino:
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Hey Gamblino,
Great work thus far. I am a situational bettor as well and actually have a binder full of situations/systems that I would like to potentially share and/or backtrack with your help if possible.
Quote Originally Posted by thegamblino:
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Hey Gamblino,
Great work thus far. I am a situational bettor as well and actually have a binder full of situations/systems that I would like to potentially share and/or backtrack with your help if possible.
Posted:
#36
Quote Originally Posted by kolespdp:
Would the Steelers fit the equation? They're winless and coming off of a bye against a Jets team on short rest.
Would the Steelers fit the equation? They're winless and coming off of a bye against a Jets team on short rest.
![]()
Quote Originally Posted by kolespdp:
Would the Steelers fit the equation? They're winless and coming off of a bye against a Jets team on short rest.
Would the Steelers fit the equation? They're winless and coming off of a bye against a Jets team on short rest.
![]()
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by thegamblino:
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Gamblino, it does not worry you that TB is starting a rookie qb in his second ever start?
Quote Originally Posted by thegamblino:
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Thanks guys.
Here is a classic for next week. Winless NFL teams are 108-68 ATS after week 5. There are 3 teams in this situation but I will take Jaguars and Giants out of equation. Why ? Because this system is 1-7 SU/ATS against unbeaten teams (Jaguars @ Denver) and 1-7 SU 3-5 ATS if winless teams are playing on short rest (NY Giants @ Chicago). Not saying that Jaguars and Giants will not cover, I am just saying that I do not want to risk my money on them. The team I am backing this week is Tampa Bay. They are winless and they are also off of their bye week. Winless teams after week 5 with more than 7 days of rest are 25-5 ATS. My play is Tampa Bay +1.
More later this week. Good luck.
Gamblino, it does not worry you that TB is starting a rookie qb in his second ever start?
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by lazylover:
Good work. I think Tampa is a good play as well. What about Pittsburg?
Good work. I think Tampa is a good play as well. What about Pittsburg?
Tampa and Pittsbugh both coming off a bye too.
With Tampa, the extra week to prepare will help their offense under Glennon. Eagles are on back to back roadies, and Vick is likely out too. I think it's a good spot for the Bucs to get a win. They've really only had one "bad" game this year losing by 20 vs the Pats. All of their three other losses were by 3 or less.
Pittsburgh could probably benefit from the bye too, as they have looked way out of sync this year. It's possible they are getting the Jets on a good week considering they played on Monday on the road and got a pretty big win. Maybe a let down spot.
Of the two, I think Tampa is a better play though. I think they'll be on my card for sure.
Quote Originally Posted by lazylover:
Good work. I think Tampa is a good play as well. What about Pittsburg?
Good work. I think Tampa is a good play as well. What about Pittsburg?
Tampa and Pittsbugh both coming off a bye too.
With Tampa, the extra week to prepare will help their offense under Glennon. Eagles are on back to back roadies, and Vick is likely out too. I think it's a good spot for the Bucs to get a win. They've really only had one "bad" game this year losing by 20 vs the Pats. All of their three other losses were by 3 or less.
Pittsburgh could probably benefit from the bye too, as they have looked way out of sync this year. It's possible they are getting the Jets on a good week considering they played on Monday on the road and got a pretty big win. Maybe a let down spot.
Of the two, I think Tampa is a better play though. I think they'll be on my card for sure.
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by sailorman1965:
I like Eagles and Indy but Raiders no way they cover 4.5 I see Kc eats them up.
I like Eagles and Indy but Raiders no way they cover 4.5 I see Kc eats them up.
He liked those teams last week and look what happened ya silly sailor
Quote Originally Posted by sailorman1965:
I like Eagles and Indy but Raiders no way they cover 4.5 I see Kc eats them up.
I like Eagles and Indy but Raiders no way they cover 4.5 I see Kc eats them up.
He liked those teams last week and look what happened ya silly sailor
Posted:
#43
btw keep up the good work THEGAMBLINO![]()
And SailorMAN I wasn't trying to be rude, sorry if it came off that way. But he took those 4 teams and won LAST week. Therefore Im waiting to see his future picks...GLTA
btw keep up the good work THEGAMBLINO![]()
And SailorMAN I wasn't trying to be rude, sorry if it came off that way. But he took those 4 teams and won LAST week. Therefore Im waiting to see his future picks...GLTA
Posted:
#48
Quote Originally Posted by thegamblino:
Right now Pittsburgh is out of equation even though they fit the system. Tampa is my only play so far.
Right now Pittsburgh is out of equation even though they fit the system. Tampa is my only play so far.
Could you explain why Pitt is out of the equation?
Quote Originally Posted by thegamblino:
Right now Pittsburgh is out of equation even though they fit the system. Tampa is my only play so far.
Right now Pittsburgh is out of equation even though they fit the system. Tampa is my only play so far.
Could you explain why Pitt is out of the equation?
Posted:
#49
Here is my play #2:
Road teams that won last game and covered the line by 5 or more points while out rushed and out passed by opponent are 65-100 ATS. This system is 2-18 ATS since 2010. This season alone we had two upset losses in this situation, as Buffalo beat Baltimore and Cleveland beat Cincinnati. So, can New England "upset" New Orleans ? I think they can, as they own the best home ATS record against teams with more wins in the NFL in last 15 years (21-9 ATS). Play: New England moneyline.
P.S. Baltimore fits one of the systems from last week (Arizona won last week) but I will stay away because they are the only team in the NFL that was never in that situation before. Hard to believe but easy to explain. Baltimore is almost never a home dog. So, no play.
Road teams that won last game and covered the line by 5 or more points while out rushed and out passed by opponent are 65-100 ATS. This system is 2-18 ATS since 2010. This season alone we had two upset losses in this situation, as Buffalo beat Baltimore and Cleveland beat Cincinnati. So, can New England "upset" New Orleans ? I think they can, as they own the best home ATS record against teams with more wins in the NFL in last 15 years (21-9 ATS). Play: New England moneyline.
P.S. Baltimore fits one of the systems from last week (Arizona won last week) but I will stay away because they are the only team in the NFL that was never in that situation before. Hard to believe but easy to explain. Baltimore is almost never a home dog. So, no play.
Here is my play #2:
Road teams that won last game and covered the line by 5 or more points while out rushed and out passed by opponent are 65-100 ATS. This system is 2-18 ATS since 2010. This season alone we had two upset losses in this situation, as Buffalo beat Baltimore and Cleveland beat Cincinnati. So, can New England "upset" New Orleans ? I think they can, as they own the best home ATS record against teams with more wins in the NFL in last 15 years (21-9 ATS). Play: New England moneyline.
P.S. Baltimore fits one of the systems from last week (Arizona won last week) but I will stay away because they are the only team in the NFL that was never in that situation before. Hard to believe but easy to explain. Baltimore is almost never a home dog. So, no play.
Road teams that won last game and covered the line by 5 or more points while out rushed and out passed by opponent are 65-100 ATS. This system is 2-18 ATS since 2010. This season alone we had two upset losses in this situation, as Buffalo beat Baltimore and Cleveland beat Cincinnati. So, can New England "upset" New Orleans ? I think they can, as they own the best home ATS record against teams with more wins in the NFL in last 15 years (21-9 ATS). Play: New England moneyline.
P.S. Baltimore fits one of the systems from last week (Arizona won last week) but I will stay away because they are the only team in the NFL that was never in that situation before. Hard to believe but easy to explain. Baltimore is almost never a home dog. So, no play.
Hot Forum Topics
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,727
-
Monday 09/21/2026
429
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,518
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
3,548
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,742
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,389
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,386
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
2,073
-
Monday Night
3,089
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
