After 90 days [248 parlays] tracking this
at level (1) = $100 the results so far are:
Key team -- 64W / 26L = 71.11% (71%)
(A) team -- 51W / 39L = 56.67% (62.5%)
(B) team -- 54W / 32L = 62.79% (62.0%)
(C) team -- 49W / 23L = 68.06% (61.5%)
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team <$2,485> ..34W/56L= 37.78% (44.5%)
(B) team +$1,357 ..37W/49L= 43.02% (44%)
(C) team +$1,251 ..32W/40L= 44.44% (43.5%)
Total Keys +$23 ..103W/145L= 41.53% (44%)
Added (percentage) after each actual percentage in is my best estimate (guess) of what average should be
-----------------------------------------------
Fwd +$23
11 Jan Day 91 level (2) $200 Key is Buffalo with:
[A] Carolina 200/
[B] Montreal 200/
[C] San Jose 200/
0
After 90 days [248 parlays] tracking this
at level (1) = $100 the results so far are:
Key team -- 64W / 26L = 71.11% (71%)
(A) team -- 51W / 39L = 56.67% (62.5%)
(B) team -- 54W / 32L = 62.79% (62.0%)
(C) team -- 49W / 23L = 68.06% (61.5%)
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team <$2,485> ..34W/56L= 37.78% (44.5%)
(B) team +$1,357 ..37W/49L= 43.02% (44%)
(C) team +$1,251 ..32W/40L= 44.44% (43.5%)
Total Keys +$23 ..103W/145L= 41.53% (44%)
Added (percentage) after each actual percentage in is my best estimate (guess) of what average should be
-----------------------------------------------
Fwd +$23
11 Jan Day 91 level (2) $200 Key is Buffalo with:
[A] Carolina 200/
[B] Montreal 200/
[C] San Jose 200/
After 91 days [251 parlays] tracking this
at level (1) = $100 the results so far are:
Key team -- 64W / 27L = 70.33% (71%)
(A) team -- 52W / 39L = 57.14% (62.5%)
(B) team -- 55W / 32L = 63.22% (62.0%)
(C) team -- 50W / 23L = 68.49% (61.5%)
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team <$2,785> ..34W/57L= 37.36% (44.5%)
(B) team +$1,157 ..37W/50L= 42.53% (44%)
(C) team +$1,051 ..32W/41L= 43.84% (43.5%)
----------------------------------
Total Keys <$577>..103W/148L= 41.04% (44%)
Added (percentage) after each actual percentage in is my best estimate (guess) of what average should be
Fwd <$577>
12 Jan Day 92 level (3) $300 Key is Nashville with:
[A] New Jersey 300/
[B] Edmonton 300/
[C] XX
0
After 91 days [251 parlays] tracking this
at level (1) = $100 the results so far are:
Key team -- 64W / 27L = 70.33% (71%)
(A) team -- 52W / 39L = 57.14% (62.5%)
(B) team -- 55W / 32L = 63.22% (62.0%)
(C) team -- 50W / 23L = 68.49% (61.5%)
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team <$2,785> ..34W/57L= 37.36% (44.5%)
(B) team +$1,157 ..37W/50L= 42.53% (44%)
(C) team +$1,051 ..32W/41L= 43.84% (43.5%)
----------------------------------
Total Keys <$577>..103W/148L= 41.04% (44%)
Added (percentage) after each actual percentage in is my best estimate (guess) of what average should be
Fwd <$577>
12 Jan Day 92 level (3) $300 Key is Nashville with:
[A] New Jersey 300/
[B] Edmonton 300/
[C] XX
After 95 days [262 parlays] tracking this
at level (1) = $100 the results so far are:
Key team -- 68W / 27L = 71.58% (71%)
(A) team -- 54W / 41L = 56.84% (62.5%)
(B) team -- 58W / 33L = 63.74% (62.0%)
(C) team -- 52W / 24L = 68.42% (61.5%)
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team <$2,597> ..36W/59L= 37.89% (44.5%)
(B) team +$1,267 ..40W/51L= 43.96% (44%)
(C) team +$1,285 ..34W/42L= 44.74% (43.5%)
Total Keys <$45>.110W/152L= 41.98% (44%)
Added (percentage) after each actual percentage in is my best estimate (guess) of what average should be.
0
After 95 days [262 parlays] tracking this
at level (1) = $100 the results so far are:
Key team -- 68W / 27L = 71.58% (71%)
(A) team -- 54W / 41L = 56.84% (62.5%)
(B) team -- 58W / 33L = 63.74% (62.0%)
(C) team -- 52W / 24L = 68.42% (61.5%)
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team <$2,597> ..36W/59L= 37.89% (44.5%)
(B) team +$1,267 ..40W/51L= 43.96% (44%)
(C) team +$1,285 ..34W/42L= 44.74% (43.5%)
Total Keys <$45>.110W/152L= 41.98% (44%)
Added (percentage) after each actual percentage in is my best estimate (guess) of what average should be.