Official (?) RPI 2013 system
You're awesome Fulk! Thanks
You're awesome Fulk! Thanks
I wish I could see this system dating back to like 2005 or something haha. No way to backtest though unless someone actually tracked it all those years. Maybe bettor2win?
I wish I could see this system dating back to like 2005 or something haha. No way to backtest though unless someone actually tracked it all those years. Maybe bettor2win?
Monday plays: Texas and LA Dodgers on the A game. Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC. 3 home teams and the LAD on the road in Miami.
Record: 96-6
A: 63-39
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Monday plays: Texas and LA Dodgers on the A game. Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC. 3 home teams and the LAD on the road in Miami.
Record: 96-6
A: 63-39
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Also good to note that the previous seasons Home team losses occurred in May and June. RPI home teams have been rolling in July and August since 2011. Useful info for next season.
I wish I could see this system dating back to like 2005 or something haha. No way to backtest though unless someone actually tracked it all those years. Maybe bettor2win?
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
Also good to note that the previous seasons Home team losses occurred in May and June. RPI home teams have been rolling in July and August since 2011. Useful info for next season.
I wish I could see this system dating back to like 2005 or something haha. No way to backtest though unless someone actually tracked it all those years. Maybe bettor2win?
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
Dan, did you figure out the record for A, B and C games for those series?
Record 33-2
- A: 21-14
- B: 8-6
- C: 3-3
- D: 1-0
Dan, did you figure out the record for A, B and C games for those series?
Record 33-2
- A: 21-14
- B: 8-6
- C: 3-3
- D: 1-0
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
Definite fluke year. Hopefully it just means we are due no more than 2 losses next season.
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
Definite fluke year. Hopefully it just means we are due no more than 2 losses next season.
Monday results: Texas wins. LAD lose on A game, to B game Tuesday.
Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC also on the A game.
Record: 97-6
A: 64-40
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Monday results: Texas wins. LAD lose on A game, to B game Tuesday.
Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC also on the A game.
Record: 97-6
A: 64-40
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Someone else has chi ws as a chase play ? What's up ?
Tuesday for this system LAD is a play on the B game, Det and KC on the A game.
As for KC/CWS, The Magna Carta system says to play the opposite of this system. That will happen sometimes. I'm taking KC to win one of 3 at home vs CWS. Maybe lay off the first game and chase the opposite of game one? I feel better betting on the better team at home. No Chris Sale in the series either.
Someone else has chi ws as a chase play ? What's up ?
Tuesday for this system LAD is a play on the B game, Det and KC on the A game.
As for KC/CWS, The Magna Carta system says to play the opposite of this system. That will happen sometimes. I'm taking KC to win one of 3 at home vs CWS. Maybe lay off the first game and chase the opposite of game one? I feel better betting on the better team at home. No Chris Sale in the series either.
Tuesday results: LAD win on the B game. Detroit and KC lose on the A game, go to B game Wednesday.
Record: 98-6
A: 64-42
B: 23-17
C: 11-6
Tuesday results: LAD win on the B game. Detroit and KC lose on the A game, go to B game Wednesday.
Record: 98-6
A: 64-42
B: 23-17
C: 11-6
Wednesday results: Detroit wins on the B game. KC loses on the B game, go to C game Thursday. Our 18th C game of the year. Incredible.
Record: 99-6
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-6
Wednesday results: Detroit wins on the B game. KC loses on the B game, go to C game Thursday. Our 18th C game of the year. Incredible.
Record: 99-6
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-6
Dan what was the juice that you got for KC for all three games?
What I personally got was -180, -170, -170. You probably could have gotten better shopping around or offshore.
Dan what was the juice that you got for KC for all three games?
What I personally got was -180, -170, -170. You probably could have gotten better shopping around or offshore.
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
I was done after the 6th lost. No need for more bleeding. Good luck to all who are playing this forward on
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
I was done after the 6th lost. No need for more bleeding. Good luck to all who are playing this forward on
But something stinks in this CWS @ KC - I don't know how that thing is working in U.S. but I know for sure a lot of games here in Europe are set or agreed. Yesterday I've checked their series, it was i think last 3 series ROAD team swept the home team... and so as Dan wrote - i couldnt watch the game but if there were chances almost intentionally left out - maybe there is something on that. I'm not the guy who goes blame Vegas and rigged games cause I've lost few units, it just made me think, and I think KC was a wrong choice yesterday, If i were to play it single i would've let it out. And I hope US are less infected with the rigging games then Europe is.
BOL to you guys and we'll get em next year.. :)
But something stinks in this CWS @ KC - I don't know how that thing is working in U.S. but I know for sure a lot of games here in Europe are set or agreed. Yesterday I've checked their series, it was i think last 3 series ROAD team swept the home team... and so as Dan wrote - i couldnt watch the game but if there were chances almost intentionally left out - maybe there is something on that. I'm not the guy who goes blame Vegas and rigged games cause I've lost few units, it just made me think, and I think KC was a wrong choice yesterday, If i were to play it single i would've let it out. And I hope US are less infected with the rigging games then Europe is.
BOL to you guys and we'll get em next year.. :)
For those still interested, A games on Cincy (home against Mil) and Texas (at CWS).
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
For those still interested, A games on Cincy (home against Mil) and Texas (at CWS).
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
