Posted:
#226
Oakland barely qualifies for a play. We have Oakland on the A game today.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Official (?) RPI 2013 system
Posted:
#227
Dan, you are doing a great job. Keep it up.
No one should be getting discouraged by the two early loses. There has been an abnormal number of qualifying series this year, so at 38-2 you should still be up close to 20 units (as someone else mentioned on the last page). Our two series losers both included multiple dog bets. I calculate the losses to be $700 on the Sox and $1000 on the Yanks. Leaves $2100 in profit. Not too bad for a months work.
I am unofficially playing Texas the weekend in addition to Oakland. Their RPI adv is close and KC is terrible while Texas is at home and the bats are hot.
0
Posted:
#228
Quote Originally Posted by BigTenWatto:
Dan, you are doing a great job. Keep it up.
Dan, you are doing a great job. Keep it up.
No one should be getting discouraged by the two early loses. There has been an abnormal number of qualifying series this year, so at 38-2 you should still be up close to 20 units (as someone else mentioned on the last page). Our two series losers both included multiple dog bets. I calculate the losses to be $700 on the Sox and $1000 on the Yanks. Leaves $2100 in profit. Not too bad for a months work.
I am unofficially playing Texas the weekend in addition to Oakland. Their RPI adv is close and KC is terrible while Texas is at home and the bats are hot.
Thanks and there is a chance I will unofficial play Texas as well. 
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Posted:
#236
Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
Noticed this trend recently: 4 of the 5 posted losses, to the rpi system, have been in a 4 game series KC 2 yrs ago, LAD & CIN last year and NYY this year. For EVERY series, game 4 ended in another loss.
Just a warning for anyone who thinks about chasing to a D game.
Noticed this trend recently: 4 of the 5 posted losses, to the rpi system, have been in a 4 game series KC 2 yrs ago, LAD & CIN last year and NYY this year. For EVERY series, game 4 ended in another loss.
Just a warning for anyone who thinks about chasing to a D game.
hmmm good info... i am chasing the laa who are in a 3 game series... this makes me think maybe i should lay off
0
Posted:
#239
Air1 thanks for that information. Quick question for you. If you played the Yanks this year on the RL +1.5 for game 2 it wouldn't have been a loss. I fortunately did just that.
That being said, could the KC loss two years ago, or the LAD and Cincy losses last year have been prevented by playing the RL as well? Just looking at another angle to keep everyone as profitable as possible.
Thanks again Air1.
0
Posted:
#240
Quote Originally Posted by SweetDickWormy:
Air1 thanks for that information. Quick question for you. If you played the Yanks this year on the RL +1.5 for game 2 it wouldn't have been a loss. I fortunately did just that.
Air1 thanks for that information. Quick question for you. If you played the Yanks this year on the RL +1.5 for game 2 it wouldn't have been a loss. I fortunately did just that.
That being said, could the KC loss two years ago, or the LAD and Cincy losses last year have been prevented by playing the RL as well? Just looking at another angle to keep everyone as profitable as possible.
Thanks again Air1.
Both losses last year were favorites all 3 games. Both losses this year would have been prevented using the +1.5 RL.
Not sure on the KC loss 2 years ago, I will defer to Air on that one.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Posted:
#242
Quote Originally Posted by 730champ:
i saw the other thread where the poster said they wont be official plays does that mean bet2win added more filters for 2013? wonder if some how he would tell the new angles or filters
i saw the other thread where the poster said they wont be official plays does that mean bet2win added more filters for 2013? wonder if some how he would tell the new angles or filters
They are not official plays by B2W, but we are using the same rules and filters that were in place last year. I'm guessing we might not hear from him on this for this year, so the best we can do is keep it the same since it has been so successful.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Posted:
#243
Degen - Those losses were not around the all-start break. they were at the end of may/beginning of june!
Dan, my book has a limit but faves can be played at +1.5, heavy juice of course. KC avg line was -140 2 yrs ago and a +1.5 chase would have lost and probably wiped out everything.
LAD +1.5 would have won you games 1+2 of the 4 game chase. CIN would have won you the C game only.
Wow - The only play I see until the weekend is baltimore (maybe!)
Dan, my book has a limit but faves can be played at +1.5, heavy juice of course. KC avg line was -140 2 yrs ago and a +1.5 chase would have lost and probably wiped out everything.
LAD +1.5 would have won you games 1+2 of the 4 game chase. CIN would have won you the C game only.
Wow - The only play I see until the weekend is baltimore (maybe!)
0
Posted:
#244
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
They are not official plays by B2W, but we are using the same rules and filters that were in place last year. I'm guessing we might not hear from him on this for this year, so the best we can do is keep it the same since it has been so successful.
Yeah - the other thread said that B2W is doing his own thing for 2013 - I think he may have added additional filters - he was able to track all RPI history from last year - so I would assume he used that data to figure out the most OPTIMAL filters.
0
Posted:
#246
DeGen, Is the spreadsheet still V3? I noticed that someone awhile ago posted about a problem with the L10 and streaks still being out of whack.
So, my question is...do I need to redownload V3? If not....it's still broken, lol.
Example: Miami on the spreadsheet has WINS: 16 (Correct), Strk: Lost 9 (Actual: Won 3), Last 10: 1-9 (Actual: 3-7). I checked off of the MLB web site.
0
Posted:
#247
Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeKaptn:
DeGen, Is the spreadsheet still V3? I noticed that someone awhile ago posted about a problem with the L10 and streaks still being out of whack.
DeGen, Is the spreadsheet still V3? I noticed that someone awhile ago posted about a problem with the L10 and streaks still being out of whack.
So, my question is...do I need to redownload V3? If not....it's still broken, lol.
Example: Miami on the spreadsheet has WINS: 16 (Correct), Strk: Lost 9 (Actual: Won 3), Last 10: 1-9 (Actual: 3-7). I checked off of the MLB web site.
Yup - theGoverner11 Pm'd me this weekend and pointed out the same thing - spending the day fixing broken stuff.
So I fixed this and uploaded V4 - (same link)
Please download V4 - as V3 had some errors. make sure to remember to copy your MLB History over so you don't lose it.
DG
0
Posted:
#248
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
They are not official plays by B2W, but we are using the same rules and filters that were in place last year. I'm guessing we might not hear from him on this for this year, so the best we can do is keep it the same since it has been so successful.
u guys are doing just fine but yes there is an updated version with few kinks to the system that I personally have done and showed it to B2W and really thinks I can minimize my risk AND maximize more porfit.
As I mentioned in my other thread, B2W will not be around anymore.
I will from time to time check in to see how u guys are doing but it seems like u guys r doing just fine.
Keep up the good work Danrules24! Key is to stay disciplined and not try to force a play like today!
0
Posted:
#249
Quote Originally Posted by twodigitz:
u guys are doing just fine but yes there is an updated version with few kinks to the system that I personally have done and showed it to B2W and really thinks I can minimize my risk AND maximize more porfit.
As I mentioned in my other thread, B2W will not be around anymore.
I will from time to time check in to see how u guys are doing but it seems like u guys r doing just fine.
Keep up the good work Danrules24! Key is to stay disciplined and not try to force a play like today!
Sounds good, appreciate the comments.
I personally will not be playing Philly as I'm sticking to the system.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Hot Forum Topics
