nhl under dogs system
How it works: Well some of you will shy away from it as this IS a chase system. A 4 game MAX chase as after 4 games the Units risked is too high. Here's the concept. Using OVERALL standings we pick the bottom 3 teams to fade. The goal is to bet against a crap teams so you'll be wagering their opponent's RUN LINE -1.5 (99% of the time this will be +$$) If the team we are FADING is the Favorite then you play their opponent's MONEY LINE instead of RUN LINE. This change to ML is made because we are only looking for +$$ payouts! So the Unit scale is as follow;
GAME 1 = 1 UNIT (a loss is only -100)
GAME 2 = 2 UNITS (loss -200 = 300 total)
GAME 3 = 3 UNITS (loss -300 + 300 = 600 total for the chase)
GAME 4 = 6 UNITS (loss starts chase over and system sustains a loss, a win here at even +105 range is +630)
We start this after 2 full weeks of games so the teams have time to squeak out their wins and losses they usually don't get except in the first week of the season and usually the last week of the season due to player changes. So the system starts 2 weeks into the season and will end somewhere around the time where teams bench players or have a lot of call ups playing. Last year I only did the first half of the season and was up more money than I ever was playing MLB wagers...It's beyond me why I didn't continue to play this but I got caught up in other crap at work and home etc etc. So will be tracking this here this year. I have not backtested this besides the first half of last year on my own and if you want to count the concept of the system in NHL which is proven to be profitable.
So if you wish to follow, Enjoy and GL
If you wish to fade, GL
If you wish to watch and or wait....thats fine too. I do suggest to start on GAME 1 of chases and not immediately into a 6 Unit play. But no one is stopping you from doing so. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong I will be doing a lot of posts from my phone.
Either way. GOOD LUCK & see you soon.
ECC
How it works: Well some of you will shy away from it as this IS a chase system. A 4 game MAX chase as after 4 games the Units risked is too high. Here's the concept. Using OVERALL standings we pick the bottom 3 teams to fade. The goal is to bet against a crap teams so you'll be wagering their opponent's RUN LINE -1.5 (99% of the time this will be +$$) If the team we are FADING is the Favorite then you play their opponent's MONEY LINE instead of RUN LINE. This change to ML is made because we are only looking for +$$ payouts! So the Unit scale is as follow;
GAME 1 = 1 UNIT (a loss is only -100)
GAME 2 = 2 UNITS (loss -200 = 300 total)
GAME 3 = 3 UNITS (loss -300 + 300 = 600 total for the chase)
GAME 4 = 6 UNITS (loss starts chase over and system sustains a loss, a win here at even +105 range is +630)
We start this after 2 full weeks of games so the teams have time to squeak out their wins and losses they usually don't get except in the first week of the season and usually the last week of the season due to player changes. So the system starts 2 weeks into the season and will end somewhere around the time where teams bench players or have a lot of call ups playing. Last year I only did the first half of the season and was up more money than I ever was playing MLB wagers...It's beyond me why I didn't continue to play this but I got caught up in other crap at work and home etc etc. So will be tracking this here this year. I have not backtested this besides the first half of last year on my own and if you want to count the concept of the system in NHL which is proven to be profitable.
So if you wish to follow, Enjoy and GL
If you wish to fade, GL
If you wish to watch and or wait....thats fine too. I do suggest to start on GAME 1 of chases and not immediately into a 6 Unit play. But no one is stopping you from doing so. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong I will be doing a lot of posts from my phone.
Either way. GOOD LUCK & see you soon.
ECC
Thanks for sharing another simple thought process.
I will not be playing, but the more thought processes that go into these forums the better.
![]()
Thanks for sharing another simple thought process.
I will not be playing, but the more thought processes that go into these forums the better.
![]()
this sounds like a good plan. my question is, once the first 2 weeks are up, how often do you change teams to fade? is it just as the standings change (potentially daily)? so if we're in the middle of a chase and the standings change, we would finish that chase and add the new team?
this sounds like a good plan. my question is, once the first 2 weeks are up, how often do you change teams to fade? is it just as the standings change (potentially daily)? so if we're in the middle of a chase and the standings change, we would finish that chase and add the new team?
I have Edmonton, Buffalo, Carolina and Colorado as bottom 3 (there's a tie) and I'm using points, not records to track this.
I have Edmonton, Buffalo, Carolina and Colorado as bottom 3 (there's a tie) and I'm using points, not records to track this.
I show Edmonton and Buffalo as the first fades on the 22nd unless Edmonton wins on the 20th, then it's just Buffalo.
I have Edmonton, Buffalo, Carolina and Colorado as bottom 3 (there's a tie) and I'm using points, not records to track this.
Colorado has 3 points, Winnipeg only 2.
I show Edmonton (1 point), Wpg, Carolina and Buffalo (2 points each) as the bottom 4. If you need to remove one team from that it should be Carolina as they have only played 4 games while the other 2 point teams have player 5 and 6.
I show Edmonton and Buffalo as the first fades on the 22nd unless Edmonton wins on the 20th, then it's just Buffalo.
I have Edmonton, Buffalo, Carolina and Colorado as bottom 3 (there's a tie) and I'm using points, not records to track this.
Colorado has 3 points, Winnipeg only 2.
I show Edmonton (1 point), Wpg, Carolina and Buffalo (2 points each) as the bottom 4. If you need to remove one team from that it should be Carolina as they have only played 4 games while the other 2 point teams have player 5 and 6.
Colorado has 3 points, Winnipeg only 2.
I show Edmonton (1 point), Wpg, Carolina and Buffalo (2 points each) as the bottom 4. If you need to remove one team from that it should be Carolina as they have only played 4 games while the other 2 point teams have player 5 and 6.
Colorado has 3 points, Winnipeg only 2.
I show Edmonton (1 point), Wpg, Carolina and Buffalo (2 points each) as the bottom 4. If you need to remove one team from that it should be Carolina as they have only played 4 games while the other 2 point teams have player 5 and 6.
Curious, what do you do if they play each other?
ECC's RULE:
If the bottom teams we are fading face each other its a NO PLAY.
Curious, what do you do if they play each other?
ECC's RULE:
If the bottom teams we are fading face each other its a NO PLAY.
I think Yes.
I think Yes.
So Fading Buffalo qualified as a play last night and the play was a win. They also qualify as a play tonight. Do you keep going against them?
I think Yes.
So Fading Buffalo qualified as a play last night and the play was a win. They also qualify as a play tonight. Do you keep going against them?
I think Yes.
Hot Forum Topics
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,727
-
Monday 09/21/2026
429
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,518
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
3,555
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,742
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,389
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,386
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
2,073
-
Monday Night
3,091
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
