Posted:
#1
monitor move me here - my past forum on correlsted parlays (cps) can be viewed in college football forum - there are 5 cps this week - 317/324/345/371/392/ - 404 is pending @ 39% - free money
ncaaf correlated parlays
Posted:
#6
I have been using an online book, they wont take anything over 33%, sometimes less, they can be stubborn, but I have done well there.
I 'tease' it down , sometimes to 27% depending on what I think I know about the teams (ha!), and have a profit to show for the last 2 years.
Occasionally I will do the first half, again 'depending'.
Posted:
#7
Quote Originally Posted by ross33:
must bet with local - no sportsbook will take these - they average 70%
I have been using an online book, they wont take anything over 33%, sometimes less, they can be stubborn, but I have done well there.
I 'tease' it down , sometimes to 27% depending on what I think I know about the teams (ha!), and have a profit to show for the last 2 years.
Occasionally I will do the first half, again 'depending'.
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:
must play all games over 40% for consistent winners-i play game total only - however 1h works - don't want to disturb local too much
1. Alabama/Georgia state is at 94%, with such a high percentage wouldn't it be better to play this game big instead of playing the other games in this time slot? Or would you just play all plays that are 40% equally?
2. Is it more beneficial to play these plays for 1h or game?
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:
So there are 6 plays this weekend, if you go 3 wins and 3 losses wouldn't that be losing overall? I assume 2 game parlays pay about 2.5.
i have no intention of going 3-3 looking for 70% or better - hopefully 5-2 - a 2 team parlay pays 13-5 sir everywhere
So there are 6 plays this weekend, if you go 3 wins and 3 losses wouldn't that be losing overall? I assume 2 game parlays pay about 2.5.
Posted:
#22
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:
If you were to play 100 on each fav/over and dog/under, a win is about 350 and a loss is -200. 3 wins would be 1050 - 3 losses of 600 for a total of 450 but you started with 1200. Is my math not correct?
my mistake above - expect to go 4-2 or better - 6 teams @ 100 would be a 1200 lay - 3-3 would result in a -120 loss / 3 losses -600 /3 wins @ 160 = 480 - difference -120 - this correct sir
If you were to play 100 on each fav/over and dog/under, a win is about 350 and a loss is -200. 3 wins would be 1050 - 3 losses of 600 for a total of 450 but you started with 1200. Is my math not correct?
Or would it hit at a higher rate?
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by clem1:
my mistake above - expect to go 4-2 or better - 6 teams @ 100 would be a 1200 lay - 3-3 would result in a -120 loss / 3 losses -600 /3 wins @ 160 = 480 - difference -120 - this correct sir
my mistake above - expect to go 4-2 or better - 6 teams @ 100 would be a 1200 lay - 3-3 would result in a -120 loss / 3 losses -600 /3 wins @ 160 = 480 - difference -120 - this correct sir
According to my calculations, you have to hit at least 5 out of 6 plays to turn a profit. Is this correct? New to this, sorry for the strange questions
Hot Forum Topics
