All Forums | Systems & Strategies

ncaaf correlated parlays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15997
Posts: 146
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #51
 ERBATIZ, can you PM me the details for the 1h? I read a few different things and want to get it right
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

3 college cps 173/178/190
2 pending @ 39% 110/120
1 nfl 222
4 plays thus far

How are any of those plays?

173 is 52.4%
178 is 39.8%
190 is 54.9%

222 in NFL is 49% right now

None of those are correlated in the true sense of what it was meant to be. 






 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #53
Very Interesting did some research and it seems I was told some wrong info. I was told correlated parlays were from 25% to 35% hmm sorry for confusion.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:

 ERBATIZ, can you PM me the details for the 1h? I read a few different things and want to get it right

I played 1h for 3 years exelent results,, just take any game  total is 7.5 or higher 2 parlays in the same game fav/over     dog/under  i cant play them anymore   yesterday lou was a winner dog/under +11/27.5, cinci is a lost DOG/OVER +11/27

tomorrow  i see some games for 1h  nebraska,tcu,texas tech,ohio,ball st,troy,baylor,clemson,n,illinois,arkansas,ucla, arizona st, alabama,wyoming,oregon,texas,  some of them the line is 7 wait if  it moves to 7.5 and go for it ..BOL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:


I played 1h for 3 years exelent results,, just take any game  total is 7.5 or higher 2 parlays in the same game fav/over     dog/under  i cant play them anymore   yesterday lou was a winner dog/under +11/27.5, cinci is a lost DOG/OVER +11/27

tomorrow  i see some games for 1h  nebraska,tcu,texas tech,ohio,ball st,troy,baylor,clemson,n,illinois,arkansas,ucla, arizona st, alabama,wyoming,oregon,texas,  some of them the line is 7 wait if  it moves to 7.5 and go for it ..BOL

Thanks, I thought it was no play if the total is over 35??? Baylor and a few of those have a total over 35
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:


Thanks, I thought it was no play if the total is over 35??? Baylor and a few of those have a total over 35
last season i played any total
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1711
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

explain please - thnx

I have never played correlated parlays or backtested.

I was suggesting seeing the "books" don't allow wagering parlays within the same game -

ex Oregon and Oregon over

    Alabama and Alabama over   maybe  wager

    Oregon with Alabama over  and then

    Alabama with Oregon over

 

Wouldn't you need the same results in order to win ? and the "books" would take the online wagering.

I'm am just throwing it out there.

Interested in anyone's opinion.

Thank You and Best of Luck

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:


Do you only play 1h?

What are your plays for Saturday?


no 1h and sat plays listed in post #40
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


How are any of those plays?

173 is 52.4%
178 is 39.8%
190 is 54.9%

222 in NFL is 49% right now

None of those are correlated in the true sense of what it was meant to be. 






i got 178 in @ 40.1% 24.5/61
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by puppetm716:

I have never played correlated parlays or backtested.

I was suggesting seeing the "books" don't allow wagering parlays within the same game -

ex Oregon and Oregon over

    Alabama and Alabama over   maybe  wager

    Oregon with Alabama over  and then

    Alabama with Oregon over

 

Wouldn't you need the same results in order to win ? and the "books" would take the online wagering.

I'm am just throwing it out there.

Interested in anyone's opinion.

Thank You and Best of Luck

this would defy the cp system and result in loss long term or maybe even short term - that would just be a reg parlay
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Very Interesting did some research and it seems I was told some wrong info. I was told correlated parlays were from 25% to 35% hmm sorry for confusion.
most sportbooks cut off at 30% - reason 40% is the play number is because that and above has proven to be most successful 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


How are any of those plays?

173 is 52.4%
178 is 39.8%
190 is 54.9%

222 in NFL is 49% right now

None of those are correlated in the true sense of what it was meant to be. 






222 in nfl is now 50% - i got it in @ 51.4% den 27/52.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #63
cps went 2-1 yesterday
den pending today
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #64

TN/Seattle at the .30 level came through for me.

So did first half of Detroit/KansasCity, also at .30.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #65

I frequently cross two games if the spread and totals are close to each other. 

If the game dynamics are similar, you should get  good outcome.

You need to lose all 4 parlays, which has seldom happened to me, to take a loss.

If you win 2, you are a big winner.

If you win just 1, you lose just a little.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #66
I forgot to mention that these can be made online.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by ross33:

I frequently cross two games if the spread and totals are close to each other. 

If the game dynamics are similar, you should get  good outcome.

You need to lose all 4 parlays, which has seldom happened to me, to take a loss.

If you win 2, you are a big winner.

If you win just 1, you lose just a little.


Can you give an example of your most recent plays using this strategy? Thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #68

I used Clemson/BC and NoiLL/Akron.  Winner!

BUT I just noticed that on another 2 games....Temple/Cinci and Ohio./CMich  I neglected to make one of the bets, which was fortunate because it was a loser, the bets I did make gave me a winner.

You have to be careful when doing this, its easy to mess up. If you like the idea I would suggest trying it with a minimum of money to see if you like it.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 8153
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

cps went 2-1 yesterday
den pending today
 3-2 sat.  Won bama,kan, and bc lost ark.st and ari.st. 
    0-1 Sunday  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #70

0-1 Sunday?  There were no .40 + games on Sunday. There usually are not.  Jax last week was a rare exception 

Yesterday TN/Seattle was the only one that came close (.26) which I played and won.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by ross33:

0-1 Sunday?  There were no .40 + games on Sunday. There usually are not.  Jax last week was a rare exception 

Yesterday TN/Seattle was the only one that came close (.26) which I played and won.

yes there was den game was 50%
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 8153
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by ross33:

0-1 Sunday?  There were no .40 + games on Sunday. There usually are not.  Jax last week was a rare exception 

Yesterday TN/Seattle was the only one that came close (.26) which I played and won.

 last time i checked 27/52 =50%  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #73

Right you are, forgot about that one, a narrow loss I think.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #74
as of now 7 cps this week - 320/322/342/352/370/376/377
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1065
Posted: #75
I'm aboard, after reading about cp's here,thanks & gl.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.