Posted:
#26
Joe Money, like MarlonB said, check out 5 years and let us know. the CFL one might work.
0
Morrison's New NFL system revealed!
Posted:
#27
Guys,
Just to be clear on his new NFL system. It won't start until the 4th week of the season. Everyone wanting an exact look of his system's record for the past 4 years, here it is.
2005-04 won [A] Arizona
2005-05 won [A] Buffalo
2005-07 won [A] San Francisco
2005-07 won [A] Saint Louis
2005-07 won [A] Miami
2005-07 won [A] Houston
2005-08 won [A] Cleveland
2005-10 won [b] Tennessee
2005-10 won [A] Arizona
2005-11 won [b] Philadelphia
2005-11 won [A] Miami
2005-12 won [A] Washington
2005-13 won [b] New York Jets
2005-13 won [A] Green Bay
2005-13 won [A] Detroit
2005-14 won [A] San Francisco
2005-16 won [b] Saint Louis
2006-04 won [A] Houston
2006-05 won [A] Pittsburgh
2006-05 won [b] Oakland
2006-05 won [A] Arizona
2006-06 won [b] Detroit
2006-08 won [A] Washington
2006-08 won [b] Miami
2006-08 won [A] Buffalo
2006-09 won [A] Philadelphia
2006-09 won [A] Philadelphia
2006-10 won [A] Tampa Bay
2006-10 won [A] Cincinnati
2006-10 won [A] Arizona
2006-11 won [b] Minnesota
2006-12 won [A] New York Giants
2006-12 won [A] Detroit
2006-12 won [b] Atlanta
2006-13 won [A] Tampa Bay
2006-13 won [A] Green Bay
2006-14 won [b] Denver
2006-15 won [A] Kansas City
2006-15 won [b] Carolina
2007-05 won [b] Saint Louis
2007-05 won [b] New Orleans
2007-06 won [A] Denver
2007-09 won [C] New York Jets
2007-09 won [A] Houston
2007-10 won [A] Saint Louis
2007-11 won [C] San Francisco
2007-11 won [A] Oakland
2007-12 won [A] Tennessee
2007-12 won [C] Carolina
2007-12 won [C] Baltimore
2007-13 won [b] Detroit
2007-15 won [b] Kansas City
2007-15 won [C] Atlanta
2007-16 won [A] Baltimore
2008-05 won [b] Saint Louis
2008-05 won [b] Detroit
2008-06 won [A] Green Bay
2008-09 won [C] San Francisco
2008-09 won [A] Denver
2008-09 won [A] Cincinnati
2008-10 won [A] Oakland
2008-11 won [b] Buffalo
2008-12 won [b] Saint Louis
2008-14 won [A] Washington
2008-14 won [b] Jacksonville
2008-14 won [A] Cincinnati
2008-15 won [A] Oakland
2008-15 won [b] Green Bay
....so obviously not 160 picks in a season...... Just to be clear on his new NFL system. It won't start until the 4th week of the season. Everyone wanting an exact look of his system's record for the past 4 years, here it is.
2005-04 won [A] Arizona
2005-05 won [A] Buffalo
2005-07 won [A] San Francisco
2005-07 won [A] Saint Louis
2005-07 won [A] Miami
2005-07 won [A] Houston
2005-08 won [A] Cleveland
2005-10 won [b] Tennessee
2005-10 won [A] Arizona
2005-11 won [b] Philadelphia
2005-11 won [A] Miami
2005-12 won [A] Washington
2005-13 won [b] New York Jets
2005-13 won [A] Green Bay
2005-13 won [A] Detroit
2005-14 won [A] San Francisco
2005-16 won [b] Saint Louis
2006-04 won [A] Houston
2006-05 won [A] Pittsburgh
2006-05 won [b] Oakland
2006-05 won [A] Arizona
2006-06 won [b] Detroit
2006-08 won [A] Washington
2006-08 won [b] Miami
2006-08 won [A] Buffalo
2006-09 won [A] Philadelphia
2006-09 won [A] Philadelphia
2006-10 won [A] Tampa Bay
2006-10 won [A] Cincinnati
2006-10 won [A] Arizona
2006-11 won [b] Minnesota
2006-12 won [A] New York Giants
2006-12 won [A] Detroit
2006-12 won [b] Atlanta
2006-13 won [A] Tampa Bay
2006-13 won [A] Green Bay
2006-14 won [b] Denver
2006-15 won [A] Kansas City
2006-15 won [b] Carolina
2007-05 won [b] Saint Louis
2007-05 won [b] New Orleans
2007-06 won [A] Denver
2007-09 won [C] New York Jets
2007-09 won [A] Houston
2007-10 won [A] Saint Louis
2007-11 won [C] San Francisco
2007-11 won [A] Oakland
2007-12 won [A] Tennessee
2007-12 won [C] Carolina
2007-12 won [C] Baltimore
2007-13 won [b] Detroit
2007-15 won [b] Kansas City
2007-15 won [C] Atlanta
2007-16 won [A] Baltimore
2008-05 won [b] Saint Louis
2008-05 won [b] Detroit
2008-06 won [A] Green Bay
2008-09 won [C] San Francisco
2008-09 won [A] Denver
2008-09 won [A] Cincinnati
2008-10 won [A] Oakland
2008-11 won [b] Buffalo
2008-12 won [b] Saint Louis
2008-14 won [A] Washington
2008-14 won [b] Jacksonville
2008-14 won [A] Cincinnati
2008-15 won [A] Oakland
2008-15 won [b] Green Bay
0
Posted:
#28
Hey Kong, can you post the entire system as it is written. Also as far as my questioning it he recently sold me his NHL and said there were 75-80 potential series - that was true. he also said there would be about 100 in NBA that was true also - so why for an extra $50-$100 would he grossly overstate his potential plays in NFL? just doesn't seem consistent - which we all know he is
0
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
PDG, come on bro. Each team on plays 16 games in the NFL. How are you going to get 160 (3) game chases out of this??? Stop giving Morrison your money bro. Don't worry, someone will post the PDF or email in the next few days. When I find it I will bring it to this thread.
Kong,
I like the stuff you post. I have a few systems of my own that I would like to discuss with you. I'll add you as a friend. If interestested, let's talk,
0
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by Duce22:
Kong,
I like the stuff you post. I have a few systems of my own that I would like to discuss with you. I'll add you as a friend. If interestested, let's talk,
Sounds great man! Betting sports without systems is like jumping out of a plane without a parachute.
Duce Duce
0
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
PDG, come on bro. Each team on plays 16 games in the NFL. How are you going to get 160 (3) game chases out of this??? Stop giving Morrison your money bro. Don't worry, someone will post the PDF or email in the next few days. When I find it I will bring it to this thread.
Hey kong the system(s) he sold me has made me 100+ units since Feb2009 - even womens baskets is money ( did you see the fever game - man those chick are good!) - so I do not mind paying for it - but i think there is more to the NFL than 15 games - IMO - but we'll see. that 3 game chase is a nice one though! thanks for sharing
0
Posted:
#33
I purchased the Blackbelt cappers for NBA and they have a system that was 58-0 last year. Just the opposite of morrisons. Take the home team if they play 3 straight verses opposite conference buying only 1.5 points. they said that they play both and sometimes win both ways. But i think we should play road team on the A bet and if that wins jump over and play the home team that lost for the remaining 2 games - may increase the plays 25-30 more per year
0
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
Sounds great man! Betting sports without systems is like jumping out of a plane without a parachute.
Duce Duce
Hey Kong,
Add me as a friend and we'll discuss. I'm currently running two MLB systems, along with two in the WNBA. I also have one for the CFL, but have to make some adjustments before playing. I'll also have one or two for the NBA.
I do find it funny when people post and bash these systems. A lot of these systems have to do with statistical probability. The thing is most people don't have the discipline to stick with the systems. For me, that's still a challenge for me at times.
0
Posted:
#35
I like what I see so far.
But, not all books are the same.
What if the team you want to bet on wins one of its three games ATS at book #1 but loses the same game ATS at book # 2 and everything else says its a system play.
Are we in the "This is an unofficial play" zone, or what?
Just wondering out loud.
But, not all books are the same.
What if the team you want to bet on wins one of its three games ATS at book #1 but loses the same game ATS at book # 2 and everything else says its a system play.
Are we in the "This is an unofficial play" zone, or what?
Just wondering out loud.
0
Posted:
#36
Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Kent:
I like what I see so far.
But, not all books are the same.
What if the team you want to bet on wins one of its three games ATS at book #1 but loses the same game ATS at book # 2 and everything else says its a system play.
Are we in the "This is an unofficial play" zone, or what?
Just wondering out loud.
I like what I see so far.
But, not all books are the same.
What if the team you want to bet on wins one of its three games ATS at book #1 but loses the same game ATS at book # 2 and everything else says its a system play.
Are we in the "This is an unofficial play" zone, or what?
Just wondering out loud.
Very true Jeff, this is the age old variance with all systems. With in any system you have to add a so called "buffer zone". Just remember that these problems come into play a fraction of the time. That is why it is important to play key numbers in all sports. If you need info on those I can share them. As for the NFL of course those numbers are 3,6,7,10. You want to always be under or over these.
0
Posted:
#37
Just went through the CFL as far back as Covers will go (2003) Here are the results.
2008: 5-0.
2007: 3-1.
2006: 3-1.
2005: 4-0.
2004: 7-0.
2003: 5-1.
Total of 27 wins and 3 losses.
Kong... what do you suggest is the best MM for this system? Are we going to straight Martingale this one, or what? Playing Lines is pretty complex dealing with 3 or 4 games every week.
2008: 5-0.
2007: 3-1.
2006: 3-1.
2005: 4-0.
2004: 7-0.
2003: 5-1.
Total of 27 wins and 3 losses.
Kong... what do you suggest is the best MM for this system? Are we going to straight Martingale this one, or what? Playing Lines is pretty complex dealing with 3 or 4 games every week.
0
Posted:
#38
Kong................
to clarify here is the new nfl betting system: if a team loses 3 straight games and doesnt cover the spread then their next game is the start of the 3 game chase. If the team that your playing on is a favorite play them on the money line if they are a dog take the pts, if the line is at a key like as 2.5,3,6.5,7 buy a half of point
When you say to buy an HALF-Point ??? Is it to buy it down.
Example the game is at 3 buy-down to 2 1/2 ???? Also what official line are we using to gauge these games ??? Are you going by the opening line or closing line. As we all know that line can move quite a bit during the whole week.
Thanks
BK
0
Posted:
#40
Kong, another question. I would assume that game 14 would be the latest a qualifying series would be able to start - giving the necessary three games to play the entire series? (i.e. if a team has not started the ATS and SU loss pattern by game 11, there will be no further series for that team the remainder of the year.) What is the rule on that?
The reason, I am questioning it is because, above you have 2007-16 Baltimore was an [A] bet winner. So I assumed based on my original thinking, that your notation indicated the 16th week, but I found Baltimore lost the 16th week to Seattle, but won the 17th week (16th game) against Pittsburgh.
If you could clarify or don't we yet know how "Morrison" will play it because this system really wasn't around last season?
Great work as always! Nice to see some "Thriller" in this forum!
The reason, I am questioning it is because, above you have 2007-16 Baltimore was an [A] bet winner. So I assumed based on my original thinking, that your notation indicated the 16th week, but I found Baltimore lost the 16th week to Seattle, but won the 17th week (16th game) against Pittsburgh.
If you could clarify or don't we yet know how "Morrison" will play it because this system really wasn't around last season?
Great work as always! Nice to see some "Thriller" in this forum!
0
Posted:
#42
Also, one other note about that. Yes, putting a cap on the last week a series can begin is a smart move in a way. Yes, it will pull some wins off the board, but it would not put us in a bind where we end up starting a series, losing the one or two games at the end (which may be meaningless games in terms of playoff implications, etc.) and biting us because we cannot finish the series. 
0
Posted:
#43
Hey guys, I will try to get to all of these questions, but remember I just copied this off another forum. I am using my NFL betting experience along with system experience to answer these questions. This system is good, but only yielding 10-15 plays per year really doesn't get me excited. Between hockey and NBA this system will be an afterthought.
0
Posted:
#46
Just be careful. That seems strange that he would outright lie in his email I mean there were no losses in 2008 MLB either...right?
Seriously, that's way more than he normally charges so you guys should confirm everything before you purchase as that seems like taking one last shot at his mailing list before he moves on to something else......Football, especially NFL is a very difficult sport to systemize.
0
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by psic_sports:
Just be careful. That seems strange that he would outright lie in his email I mean there were no losses in 2008 MLB either...right?
Seriously, that's way more than he normally charges so you guys should confirm everything before you purchase as that seems like taking one last shot at his mailing list before he moves on to something else......Football, especially NFL is a very difficult sport to systemize.
Look at PSIC coming out of the cold of Iceland to spread his wisdom!!! I think everyone can agree here that JM is full of shit.LOL
0
Hot Forum Topics
