I think I know what Morrison's new NFL betting system is.
When a team loses and fails to cover 3 games in a row, a series starts. This is a very strong system, but it has been played by many for years. Another stolen system to cash in $300 a pop.
Can someone who was robbed out of $300 verify that I am correct? Please do before that thief makes anymore money.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I think I know what Morrison's new NFL betting system is.
When a team loses and fails to cover 3 games in a row, a series starts. This is a very strong system, but it has been played by many for years. Another stolen system to cash in $300 a pop.
Can someone who was robbed out of $300 verify that I am correct? Please do before that thief makes anymore money.
I just got confirmation that this is it boys. Thank the Kong, I love you all!
And a note to Tan,Lan,or John Morrison. The reason why I posted this is becuase you have no integrity, class, or honesty. People pay you their hard earned money and then you constantly screw them for more. You did not create any of these systems, just out marketed the people that did. If you were more honest with your plays and actually gave two shits about your clients, very few people would always try to screw you like this.
0
I just got confirmation that this is it boys. Thank the Kong, I love you all!
And a note to Tan,Lan,or John Morrison. The reason why I posted this is becuase you have no integrity, class, or honesty. People pay you their hard earned money and then you constantly screw them for more. You did not create any of these systems, just out marketed the people that did. If you were more honest with your plays and actually gave two shits about your clients, very few people would always try to screw you like this.
Well, what do you think of it now that you know it?
Nole I've been backtesting it all night. Unfortunately there is only about 15 plays per year, but the system does no lose. Many A and B games, but few C games. Remember that year when New England went undefeated and they went to Baltimore and almost lost? Baltimore was a C game and covered the 19 points easily.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:
That is what's up!!!
Dude, you are the best.
Well, what do you think of it now that you know it?
Nole I've been backtesting it all night. Unfortunately there is only about 15 plays per year, but the system does no lose. Many A and B games, but few C games. Remember that year when New England went undefeated and they went to Baltimore and almost lost? Baltimore was a C game and covered the 19 points easily.
Hi, kongkiller. I love your stuff. Just to make it
plain, are you saying that a team MUST lose AND fail to cover three
straight games in order to qualify? A winner who fails to cover the
spread and a loser who does cover would not qualify, correct? Does this
carry over from season to season--in other words, teams that fell
within this criteria at the end of last season may be potential plays
for the beginning of this season? Any thoughts as to how preseason may
play into this? Thanks for your insight.
0
Hi, kongkiller. I love your stuff. Just to make it
plain, are you saying that a team MUST lose AND fail to cover three
straight games in order to qualify? A winner who fails to cover the
spread and a loser who does cover would not qualify, correct? Does this
carry over from season to season--in other words, teams that fell
within this criteria at the end of last season may be potential plays
for the beginning of this season? Any thoughts as to how preseason may
play into this? Thanks for your insight.
Nole I've been backtesting it all night. Unfortunately there is only about 15 plays per year, but the system does no lose. Many A and B games, but few C games. Remember that year when New England went undefeated and they went to Baltimore and almost lost? Baltimore was a C game and covered the 19 points easily.
Nice find, looked fast/fast.
Covers has DENVER not covering 6 in a row week 3 to week 9 of last year.
Is he really charging 300 bucks for that? WOW
GMSI
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
Nole I've been backtesting it all night. Unfortunately there is only about 15 plays per year, but the system does no lose. Many A and B games, but few C games. Remember that year when New England went undefeated and they went to Baltimore and almost lost? Baltimore was a C game and covered the 19 points easily.
Nice find, looked fast/fast.
Covers has DENVER not covering 6 in a row week 3 to week 9 of last year.
Hi, kongkiller. I love your stuff. Just to make it plain, are you saying that a team MUST lose AND fail to cover three straight games in order to qualify? A winner who fails to cover the spread and a loser who does cover would not qualify, correct? Does this carry over from season to season--in other words, teams that fell within this criteria at the end of last season may be potential plays for the beginning of this season? Any thoughts as to how preseason may play into this? Thanks for your insight.
Thanks for the compliment man. You are correct Udpert....MUST lose AND fail to cover three straight games in order to qualify...A winner who fails to cover the spread and a loser who does cover would not qualify. And like most every system I've ever played this one does not carry over from season to season. Don't play preseason, due to the season is only 4 weeks long and you need at least 6 games to play this system. I've played this system in the past and can answer all questions about it. It is not that popular due to the fact that some years it only yeilds 10-15 plays. It does work well though and it hasn't lost in over 5 years. My buddy Tod with PSIC taught me this system last year. And what do you know, Tan(A past client of his) goes and markets it. LOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by udpert:
Hi, kongkiller. I love your stuff. Just to make it plain, are you saying that a team MUST lose AND fail to cover three straight games in order to qualify? A winner who fails to cover the spread and a loser who does cover would not qualify, correct? Does this carry over from season to season--in other words, teams that fell within this criteria at the end of last season may be potential plays for the beginning of this season? Any thoughts as to how preseason may play into this? Thanks for your insight.
Thanks for the compliment man. You are correct Udpert....MUST lose AND fail to cover three straight games in order to qualify...A winner who fails to cover the spread and a loser who does cover would not qualify. And like most every system I've ever played this one does not carry over from season to season. Don't play preseason, due to the season is only 4 weeks long and you need at least 6 games to play this system. I've played this system in the past and can answer all questions about it. It is not that popular due to the fact that some years it only yeilds 10-15 plays. It does work well though and it hasn't lost in over 5 years. My buddy Tod with PSIC taught me this system last year. And what do you know, Tan(A past client of his) goes and markets it. LOL
Covers has DENVER not covering 6 in a row week 3 to week 9 of last year.
Is he really charging 300 bucks for that? WOW
GMSI
GMSI man that would not have been a play. Denver won on 10/05, so on 11/06 it would have been an "A" game win. Trust me man I just spent 3 hours checking this shit out again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GMSI:
Nice find, looked fast/fast.
Covers has DENVER not covering 6 in a row week 3 to week 9 of last year.
Is he really charging 300 bucks for that? WOW
GMSI
GMSI man that would not have been a play. Denver won on 10/05, so on 11/06 it would have been an "A" game win. Trust me man I just spent 3 hours checking this shit out again.
When All teams played as any home/road team Last 5 years coming off a 3 losing streakcoming off a 3 ATS lost With no Situation With no Situation
ATS Winner
SU Winner
-->
Over/Under
-->
So this would be your results after Game 1 of the chase, again I believe these stats are with closing lines... For G2 would have to go through the 33 losses manually... Also looks about right, 5 years and 53 plays about 15plays/year. Your average 100$ or 50$ bettor would have to make 3 or 6 units respectively just to pay off th 297$. LOL
GMSI
0
Did a quick test on the ATSDB...
When All teams played as any home/road team Last 5 years coming off a 3 losing streakcoming off a 3 ATS lost With no Situation With no Situation
ATS Winner
SU Winner
-->
Over/Under
-->
So this would be your results after Game 1 of the chase, again I believe these stats are with closing lines... For G2 would have to go through the 33 losses manually... Also looks about right, 5 years and 53 plays about 15plays/year. Your average 100$ or 50$ bettor would have to make 3 or 6 units respectively just to pay off th 297$. LOL
Kong, is there a similar system for teams winning and covering 3 in a row in order to start a series to fade them? Much appreciated. You should have called yourself, the JMTanKiller!
0
Kong, is there a similar system for teams winning and covering 3 in a row in order to start a series to fade them? Much appreciated. You should have called yourself, the JMTanKiller!
Kong, is there a similar system for teams winning and covering 3 in a row in order to start a series to fade them? Much appreciated. You should have called yourself, the JMTanKiller!
LOL.......
I don't know about a fade system Kangy, it would of lost when New England busted off 8 ATS wins in 07 though. We should look into it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:
Kong, is there a similar system for teams winning and covering 3 in a row in order to start a series to fade them? Much appreciated. You should have called yourself, the JMTanKiller!
LOL.......
I don't know about a fade system Kangy, it would of lost when New England busted off 8 ATS wins in 07 though. We should look into it.
to clarify here is the new nfl betting system: if a team loses 3 straight games and doesnt cover the spread then their next game is the start of the 3 game chase. If the team that your playing on is a favorite play them on the money line if they are a dog take the pts, if the line is at a key like as 2.5,3,6.5,7 buy a half of point
0
to clarify here is the new nfl betting system: if a team loses 3 straight games and doesnt cover the spread then their next game is the start of the 3 game chase. If the team that your playing on is a favorite play them on the money line if they are a dog take the pts, if the line is at a key like as 2.5,3,6.5,7 buy a half of point
Alright, I just went through all 120 NCAA teams last year... tell me what you guys think...
First a couple of rules... - Eliminated any series that didn't have at least 3 games left in the season. - One instance where a team met criteria, however their next game was against an FCS team, so there was no spread. Threw this series out. - Two instances were an FCS team came in the middle of a chase, so I included these series, simply skipping this game.
In the 2008 NCAA Season, I tallied up 25-2, as follows...
927 Houston [A] 927 UTEP [A] 927 Syracuse [A] 1004 Rutgers [A] 1004 E Michigan [B] 1011 Arizona St. [A] 1011 Arkansas [A] 1011 Idaho [B] 1018 E Carolina [A] 1018 N Texas [A] 1025 Indiana [C] 1025 Wisconsin [B] 1025 San Diego St. [A] 1028 Marshal [A] 1101 S Miss [C] 1101 Wyoming [C] 1101 Clemson [A] 1108 Iowa St. [B] 1108 Michigan [C] 1108 W Kentucky [A] 1108 Wash St. [C] 1115 Auburn [B] 1115 New Mex St. [B] 1122 Arkansas St. [A] 1123 South Florida [A]
2 Losses were Washington in September, and Colorado during their last 3 games of the year.
Averaging 8.25 units per loss.... that is 25 wins, 16.5 losses, so up almost 9 units?
Any suggestions?
0
Alright, I just went through all 120 NCAA teams last year... tell me what you guys think...
First a couple of rules... - Eliminated any series that didn't have at least 3 games left in the season. - One instance where a team met criteria, however their next game was against an FCS team, so there was no spread. Threw this series out. - Two instances were an FCS team came in the middle of a chase, so I included these series, simply skipping this game.
In the 2008 NCAA Season, I tallied up 25-2, as follows...
927 Houston [A] 927 UTEP [A] 927 Syracuse [A] 1004 Rutgers [A] 1004 E Michigan [B] 1011 Arizona St. [A] 1011 Arkansas [A] 1011 Idaho [B] 1018 E Carolina [A] 1018 N Texas [A] 1025 Indiana [C] 1025 Wisconsin [B] 1025 San Diego St. [A] 1028 Marshal [A] 1101 S Miss [C] 1101 Wyoming [C] 1101 Clemson [A] 1108 Iowa St. [B] 1108 Michigan [C] 1108 W Kentucky [A] 1108 Wash St. [C] 1115 Auburn [B] 1115 New Mex St. [B] 1122 Arkansas St. [A] 1123 South Florida [A]
2 Losses were Washington in September, and Colorado during their last 3 games of the year.
Averaging 8.25 units per loss.... that is 25 wins, 16.5 losses, so up almost 9 units?
to clarify here is the new nfl betting system: if a team loses 3 straight games and doesnt cover the spread then their next game is the start of the 3 game chase. If the team that your playing on is a favorite play them on the money line if they are a dog take the pts, if the line is at a key like as 2.5,3,6.5,7 buy a half of point
thanks kong - why do you suppose that John says there are potentially 160 possible plays per season? maybe there is more to it than that?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
to clarify here is the new nfl betting system: if a team loses 3 straight games and doesnt cover the spread then their next game is the start of the 3 game chase. If the team that your playing on is a favorite play them on the money line if they are a dog take the pts, if the line is at a key like as 2.5,3,6.5,7 buy a half of point
thanks kong - why do you suppose that John says there are potentially 160 possible plays per season? maybe there is more to it than that?
How about running those numbers for the last 5 years and see what you come up with, that would probably give you a better idea!
Back testing for a year is good but i think for the last 5 years would be better. Just an idea. By the way, appreciate all the work, I know it didn't take you 5 minutes to do all that. Good look'in out!!!!!
0
JoeMoney
How about running those numbers for the last 5 years and see what you come up with, that would probably give you a better idea!
Back testing for a year is good but i think for the last 5 years would be better. Just an idea. By the way, appreciate all the work, I know it didn't take you 5 minutes to do all that. Good look'in out!!!!!
thanks kong - why do you suppose that John says there are potentially 160 possible plays per season? maybe there is more to it than that?
Morrison said that so after people saw the system posted in the threads, they would think it's not true and send him $300. Go ahead and send him the check dude. You will be rather pissed when you do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pdg893:
thanks kong - why do you suppose that John says there are potentially 160 possible plays per season? maybe there is more to it than that?
Morrison said that so after people saw the system posted in the threads, they would think it's not true and send him $300. Go ahead and send him the check dude. You will be rather pissed when you do.
Hot Forum Topics
